Skip to main content

Spousal Right of Election Attorney New York

New York spousal right of election attorneys protecting surviving spouses from disinheritance. Learn your elective share rights under EPTL 5-1.1-A today.

Attorney Albert Goodwin
Albert Goodwin, Esq.

Discovering that your spouse left you out of the will, or left you far less than you expected, is devastating, emotionally and financially. New York law does not permit one spouse to disinherit the other completely. Under the spousal right of election, a surviving spouse may claim a statutory minimum share of the deceased spouse’s estate no matter what the will says or how the assets were titled.

We represent surviving spouses enforcing their elective share, and we represent executors, trustees and beneficiaries responding to an election. This page explains how the share is computed, which non-probate assets it reaches, the deadlines, the grounds on which a spouse can be disqualified, and how a waiver in a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement is tested.

What Is the Spousal Right of Election in New York?

The spousal right of election is a statutory protection codified in EPTL Section 5-1.1-A. It guarantees that a surviving spouse may elect to receive a minimum portion of the deceased spouse’s estate, the elective share, even if the will leaves the spouse nothing or directs the assets elsewhere. The policy is straightforward: New York treats marriage as an economic partnership and will not allow one partner to leave the other destitute at death. New Yorkers have broad freedom to dispose of property by will, but that freedom ends where the surviving spouse’s statutory rights begin.

Under EPTL 5-1.1-A the surviving spouse is entitled to the greater of $50,000 or one-third of the net estate. If the net estate is worth less than $50,000, the surviving spouse takes the entire net estate. Critically, the “net estate” for this purpose is not limited to assets passing under the will. It includes the probate estate plus a category of non-probate assets known as testamentary substitutes, less debts, administration expenses and reasonable funeral expenses. That expanded definition stops a spouse from defeating the election by simply moving assets outside the will before death.

Testamentary Substitutes: Why the Elective Share Reaches Beyond the Will

The treatment of testamentary substitutes is the most important, and most litigated, feature of the statute. Many people try to disinherit a spouse by placing assets in joint accounts, trusts or beneficiary-designated accounts that pass outside probate. EPTL 5-1.1-A anticipates that strategy and pulls many of those assets back into the net estate.

Testamentary substitutes generally include Totten trusts (in-trust-for bank accounts) and payable-on-death accounts; joint bank accounts and jointly held property with rights of survivorship, to the extent of the decedent’s contribution; revocable lifetime trusts created by the decedent; gifts made within one year of death, to the extent they exceed the federal gift tax annual exclusion; retirement accounts, including pensions, 401(k) plans and IRAs, subject to certain rules and limitations; property over which the decedent held a general power of appointment; United States savings bonds and similar instruments payable to a designated beneficiary; and transfers in which the decedent kept a life income interest or the power to revoke or invade.

Some assets are excluded, most notably life insurance proceeds payable to a named beneficiary other than the estate. Identifying, valuing and characterizing testamentary substitutes is usually the central battleground of elective share litigation, and it takes both legal skill and forensic diligence.

How the Elective Share Is Calculated

The calculation runs in five steps, any one of which can become contested.

  1. Identify the probate estate

    All assets passing under the will or by intestacy.

  2. Identify and value the testamentary substitutes

    Joint accounts, revocable trusts, retirement assets, recent gifts and the other qualifying transfers.

  3. Deduct debts, administration expenses and reasonable funeral expenses

    The result is the net estate. Estate taxes are not deducted before computing the elective share.

  4. Compute the elective share

    The greater of $50,000 or one-third of the net estate.

  5. Credit what the spouse already received

    Any property passing to the spouse under the will, by intestacy or as a testamentary substitute is applied against the elective share. The spouse is entitled only to the shortfall, known as the net elective share.

If there is a shortfall, the other beneficiaries of the estate and the recipients of testamentary substitutes contribute ratably to satisfy the spouse’s claim. An elective share claim therefore affects the executor, the individual beneficiaries, trustees and joint account holders, any of whom may need their own counsel.

Strict Deadlines: When the Election Must Be Made

The right of election is not automatic. The surviving spouse must exercise it, and the deadlines are unforgiving. Under EPTL 5-1.1-A the election must be made within six months after letters testamentary or letters of administration are issued, and in no event later than two years after the date of death. To exercise it, the spouse serves a written notice of election on the executor or administrator (or their attorney), personally or by certified mail, and files the notice with the Surrogate’s Court in the county where the estate is being administered, together with proof of service.

The Surrogate’s Court has discretion to extend the deadline for reasonable cause if the application is made within the two-year window, but an extension is never guaranteed. A surviving spouse who suspects they have been shortchanged should get advice immediately; waiting can permanently forfeit rights worth hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.

Who Can Be Disqualified From the Elective Share?

Not every surviving spouse is entitled to elect. EPTL 5-1.2 sets out the grounds of disqualification, and estates defending against an election raise them regularly.

GroundCondition
Divorce or annulmentA final judgment of divorce or annulment was in effect when the decedent died.
Void marriageThe marriage was incestuous, bigamous or otherwise invalid.
Decree of separationA final decree of separation was rendered against the surviving spouse and remained in effect at death.
AbandonmentThe surviving spouse abandoned the decedent and the abandonment continued until death.
Failure to supportThe surviving spouse failed or refused to support the decedent despite having the means or ability to do so, unless the marital relationship was resumed.

Abandonment and failure to support are fact-intensive defenses that usually require extensive discovery, witness testimony and documentary evidence. The burden of proving disqualification rests on the party asserting it, typically the executor or the beneficiaries who stand to lose if the election succeeds.

Waiver of the Right of Election: Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements

The right of election can be waived, before or during the marriage, but only if the waiver satisfies the statutory formalities. Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(e) a waiver must be in writing, signed by the spouse making it, and acknowledged in the manner required for recording a deed, that is, before a notary with a proper certificate of acknowledgment. Waivers most commonly appear in prenuptial and postnuptial agreements. They may be absolute or conditional, and they may apply to a particular will or to any will.

Even a facially valid waiver can be challenged for fraud, duress, overreaching, unconscionability or a defective acknowledgment. If you are being told you waived your elective share, do not assume the waiver is enforceable until a lawyer who handles elective share litigation has reviewed it.

Common Scenarios Where the Right of Election Arises

  • Second marriages and blended families

    Elective share disputes frequently arise when a decedent leaves most or all of the estate to children from a prior marriage. The surviving spouse’s election can dramatically reshape the distribution plan, often triggering contested proceedings between the spouse and the stepchildren.

  • Late-in-life marriages

    When an older person marries shortly before death, family members may challenge the marriage itself or assert disqualification defenses, while the surviving spouse seeks to enforce the statutory share.

  • Asset transfers designed to defeat the election

    A decedent may have retitled accounts, funded revocable trusts or made large gifts shortly before death. Tracing those transfers and establishing that they qualify as testamentary substitutes is essential to recovering the full elective share.

  • Estranged but still-married couples

    Couples who separated informally but never divorced remain married for elective share purposes. These cases often turn on the abandonment and support defenses under EPTL 5-1.2.

  • Disputed waivers

    A prenuptial agreement signed decades earlier, sometimes without independent counsel or full financial disclosure, may be challenged when one spouse dies and the survivor seeks an elective share.

Elective Share Proceedings in Surrogate’s Court

Elective share disputes are litigated in the Surrogate’s Court of the county where the estate is being administered. A contested election can involve discovery proceedings under SCPA 2103 and 2104 to identify and recover estate assets and testamentary substitutes, an accounting proceeding compelling the fiduciary to disclose all assets, transactions and valuations, a determination of the validity of the election itself, including the disqualification and waiver defenses, valuation disputes over real estate, business interests and complex financial assets, and ratable contribution proceedings to compel beneficiaries and recipients of testamentary substitutes to satisfy the net elective share.

Because the elective share is paid outright (New York abolished the old rules permitting satisfaction through trust interests for decedents dying on or after September 1, 1992), the financial stakes for everyone involved are immediate and significant.

Planning Considerations: Protecting Your Estate Plan or Your Rights

The right of election matters just as much on the planning side. If you are creating an estate plan in New York, we can structure it so that the provisions for your spouse satisfy or exceed the elective share, which reduces the risk of litigation after death; negotiate and draft an enforceable prenuptial or postnuptial agreement with a valid waiver; explain which assets count as testamentary substitutes and how lifetime transfers will be treated; and coordinate trusts, retirement accounts and beneficiary designations with your marital and family objectives.

For a surviving spouse, early advice is equally important. Before signing any waiver, release or receipt presented by an executor, have it reviewed. Documents signed during estate administration can compromise your election rights.

Frequently Asked Questions About the New York Right of Election

  • Can my spouse completely disinherit me in New York?

    No. Unless you are disqualified or have validly waived your rights, New York law entitles you to the greater of $50,000 or one-third of the net estate, including testamentary substitutes, no matter what the will says.

  • Does the right of election apply if there is no will?

    Yes. It applies whether the decedent died with or without a will. In intestacy the surviving spouse already receives a substantial share under EPTL 4-1.1, but the election can matter where significant assets passed outside the estate through testamentary substitutes to others.

  • What if most of the assets were in a trust or joint accounts?

    Revocable trusts, joint accounts (to the extent of the decedent’s contribution) and many beneficiary-designated assets are testamentary substitutes counted in the net estate. The election can reach those assets even though they never passed through probate.

  • I signed a prenuptial agreement. Am I out of luck?

    Not necessarily. A waiver must meet strict formal requirements and may be vulnerable to challenge for fraud, duress, lack of disclosure, unconscionability or a defective acknowledgment. Have the agreement evaluated before you concede anything.

  • How long do I have to file my election?

    Generally six months from the issuance of letters to the fiduciary, and never more than two years from the date of death, subject to limited court-granted extensions for reasonable cause. These deadlines are strictly enforced.

  • Do unmarried partners have election rights?

    No. The right of election belongs only to a legal surviving spouse. Unmarried partners, however long the relationship, have no elective share rights under New York law, which makes proactive estate planning essential for unmarried couples.

Speak With Us

Elective share matters sit at the intersection of estate litigation, trust law, matrimonial law and forensic asset analysis, and we handle them from both sides, for surviving spouses and for the estates and beneficiaries answering an election. If you have been disinherited or shortchanged by your spouse’s will, or you are an executor or beneficiary facing an election claim, the decisions you make in the coming weeks will shape the outcome. Call 212-233-1233 or email [email protected]. For the statute in depth, see our EPTL 5-1.1-A elective share guide and our elective share attorney page.

Albert Goodwin gave interviews to and appeared on the following media outlets:

ProPublica Forbes ABC CNBC CBS NBC News Discovery Wall Street Journal NPR

Speak with our firm

Call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected] to discuss your matter.

Client Reviews

Verified feedback from our clients

Mr. Goodwin is everything you want in an attorney: professional, honest, thorough, and genuinely caring. He always explains things clearly, so I understood exactly what was happening and what to expect next. His attention to detail and persistence really stood out. Looking back, I feel lucky to have found him. He guided me through the whole process expertly, and I deeply appreciate all his hard work. Would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Sarah M

Legal Services

Thanks to Mr. Albert Goodwin's hard work and smart thinking, I finally won my case, which has been a long time coming. He figured out solutions that no one else could see. I'm really impressed by his strong ethics - something that's rare these days. As my lawyer, he went above and beyond what I expected. I'm so grateful I found him and would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Lawrence H

Legal Services

From our first meeting, I knew I was in great hands with Albert and his associate Katrina. They handled my case with incredible skill and efficiency, even though they took it over from another firm. What impressed me most was how quickly Albert responded to my questions with honest, clear answers - no sugarcoating, just straight talk. They managed a huge workload under tight deadlines, and their fees were very reasonable for such high-quality work. Beyond his legal expertise, Albert's wit and personality made a difficult process much easier to handle. I'm deeply grateful for their hard work and would absolutely choose them again. If you need legal help in New York, you won't find better representation than Albert's firm.

Adam F

Legal Services

VIEW MORE
New York State Bar Association Member Badge New York City Bar Association Member Badge American Bar Association Member Badge Avvo Rated Attorney Badge