A Guide to Easements in New York City

You may be wondering how easements work in New York. An easement is a legal right to use someone else’s land for a particular purpose. An easement does not grant any right of ownership over the land, but it does grant use of the other person’s land for the purpose stated in the easement.

driveway easement is the most common type.  The issue of blocking the easement and not letting the easement holder use it is the most common disagreement.

If you are looking for an easement attorney, we at the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin are here for you. You can call us at 212-233-1233 or send us an email at [email protected].

Typically, easements are granted to travel through land of another to access another land, such as an easement of right of way. For example, when a land that is purchased is landlocked, meaning it is surrounded by other lands with no access to a public road, an easement of necessity of a right of way may be granted by the court to allow that land access to a public road.

Thus, that land (the “dominant estate”) will be granted a right of way to cross another person’s land (the “servient estate”) for that particular purpose of accessing the public road. This easement is strictly construed and only grants the easement holder the use of that land for travel from one place to another and for no other purpose.

This strict construction arises from the fact that the law favors the unrestricted use of one’s property. Thus, the easement holder cannot, one day, plant vegetables, put a fence, beautify, or do any other act of possession or ownership on the property covered by the easement, except for that particular purpose granted to him under the easement. When an easement holder does an act that is not an authorized purpose under the grant of the easement, it will be considered trespass.

Most issues regarding easement relate to trespass, abuse and misuse of easement, interference with one’s use of the easement, encroachment termination, abandonment, and damages.

Types of Easements

How easements work in New York depends on how they were created or to whom they were granted. For example, easements are created by agreement, by prescription or by necessity.

Prescriptive Easement

When one uses another person’s land for a particular purpose under claim of right with the owner’s knowledge openly, exclusively, notoriously, and continuously for the statutory period, that use can ripen to an easement by prescription. 315 Main St. v. WA 319 Main. In New York, the statutory period is 10 years. To get the full legal right to use this easement, you’d have to get a judgment from the court. This is similar to adverse possession (RAPL 501), but there is no right to possession, only to use the land for the particular purpose.

For example, a driveway or passageway.

The court assumes that the use was adverse, unless the owner of the land can prove that they gave consent for the claimant to use the property, in which case the claimant would lose the prescriptive easement lawsuit.

In other words, where the use has been shown by clear and convincing evidence to be open, notorious, continuous, and undisputed, it is presumed that the use was hostile, and the burden shifts to the opponent of the alleged prescriptive easement to show that the use was permissive. But if the defendant proves that the plaintiff’s use of the purported easement was permitted as a matter of willing accord and neighborly accommodation, then the burden would shift back to the plaintiff to come forward with evidence of hostile use.

Easement by Necessity

An easement by necessity is an implied easement declared by the court as existing when there is a need for such easement, such as when a property is surrounded by other land with no means of accessing a public road.

To establish an implied easement based upon preexisting use, three requirements must be satisfied (Four v. Dynko.):

  1. unity and subsequent separation of title (the claimant and the neighbor’s properties must have been one parcel at some point)
  2. the claimed easement must have, prior to separation, been so long continued and obvious as to show it was intended to be permanent, and
  3. the use must have been necessary to the beneficial enjoyment of the dominant estate at the time of the conveyance

Easement Appurtenant

Easements may also be granted to a dominant estate, which runs with the land and is not affected by transfer of ownership, called “easement appurtenant” or to a particular person, which runs with the person and is extinguished upon the death of a person, called “gross easement.”

An example of an easement appurtenant is the easement of right of way described above.

Gross Easement

An example of a gross easement, which was more popular in the past, is an easement to hike over one’s land or to fish in one’s lake. These types of easements are usually granted to one person and are extinguished upon that person’s death. They are not so commonly granted anymore in current times.

The issues relating to how easements work in New York today relate to its existence, its use and abuse, and termination. Easements restrict a landowner’s use of his own property and can lower its value. For this reason, many property owners who learn about the existence of an easement in their property may find ways of terminating it.

Attempting to Terminate an Easement

Terminating an easement is New York is not easy. The court presumes an easement to be valid. This especially applies to easements that are in writing, typically as part of a deed. Those are pretty much impossible to change or terminate. Terminating an easement is challenging, but it can be done in some circumstances.

In attempting to terminate an easement, we look first into how the easement was created. If the easement was created by agreement, then it can only be extinguished by abandonment, condemnation, adverse possession, merger or with the consent of the owner of the dominant estate. If the easement was created by law due to necessity, there is an additional way to terminate the easement: when the easement is no longer needed.

The strategy for terminating an easement depends on the type of easement. An easement by necessity can be terminated when the need no longer exists. For easements created by agreement, however, it can only be terminated by adverse possession or prescription, by release, by abandonment, or the merger of the servient estate owner and dominant estate owner in one person.

Abandonment

To terminate an easement, the owner of the dominant estate (the easement holder) should abandon the easement. To prove abandonment, there must be an intention to abandon the easement coupled with an overt act or failure to act. Mere non-use, even if for a long time, does not evidence an intention to abandon the easement.

Condemnation

Condemnation or expropriation is the government’s act of appropriating private property for public use with payment of just compensation. For example, when there is land subject to an easement but the government condemns it in order to build a public road, that easement is extinguished when the government condemns the land.

Adverse Possession

Adverse possession occurs when the servient estate owner, the landowner burdened with the easement, blocks the easement in a manner that is exclusive, open and notoriously hostile, preventing the dominant estate owner from using the easement for a continuous period of 10 years. In Spiegel v. Ferraro, 73 N.Y.2d 622 (1989), the Court declared an easement extinguished when the servient estate owner’s tenant erected gates across the easement, exercising exclusive use over the easement for a period of more than 10 years, and the dominant estate owner only demanded the removal of the gates after 10 years. Here, since the period to demand the removal of the gates had lapsed due to the state of limitations, the servient estate owner was able to extinguish the easement through adverse possession.

Merger

Merger occurs when the owner of the servient estate and dominant estate become one and the same. It is akin to a release or consent of the dominant estate owner to extinguish the easement.

Release

Release occurs when the dominant estate owner consents in writing to the extinguishment of the easement.

End of Necessity

For easements that were created due to a need, such as a parcel that is landlocked with no access to a public road, when such parcel begins to have access to the public road, the need for such easement terminates and the easement may be extinguished.

Details of How Easements Work

  1. EASEMENT – a non-possessory interest in land that involves a right to USE another’s land.
    1. Affirmative – most easements are affirmative. (right to do something on servient land)
    2. Negative (5 types) – light, air, lateral or subjacent support, flow of an artificial stream.
      1. Can also be a restrictive covenant
      2. Can ONLY be created expressly by writing signed by the grantor. There is no natural or automatic right to a negative easement.
  • Classifying the Easement
    1. Appurtenant – when easement directly benefits the use and enjoyment of a specific parcel of land. (it takes two)
      1. Dominant tenement – benefited land
      2. Servient tenement – burdened land
    2. In gross – When easement confers only a personal/pecuniary advantage that is not related to his use or enjoyment of his land.
      1. ONLY Servient tenement because land is burdened but not benefited.
    3. Transferability
      1. Appurtenant
        1. Dominant tenement passes automatically, regardless of mention in conveyance
        2. Servient tenement passes automatically unless the new owner is a BFP w/o notice.
      2. In gross – not transferable unless it is for commercial purposes
    4. Creation
      1. By Prescription (Adversely possessing)
        1. Open and Notorious use
        2. Adverse / Hostile (w/o servient owners consent – permission defeats)
        3. Continuous and Uninterrupted
        4. For the SOL
          1. Note – Exclusive possession is not required
      2. Implied From Existing Use
        1. Prior to division of a single tract
        2. An apparent and continuous (Open and obvious) use exists on the servient part
        3. That is reasonably necessary for dominant part, AND
        4. Court determines the parties intended for use to continue after division of the land
      3. By Necessity – landlocked setting
        1. Right of way will be implied by necessity if grantor conveys a portion of his land with no way out, except over part of grantors remaining land.
        2. The owner of the servient estate has the right to choose the location of the easement as long as it is reasonable.
      4. Express Grant – for more than 1 year must be in writing that complies w/formal elements of a deed. (Writing, signed by the Servient estate, identify land)
        1. Can also be created by express reservation.
    5. Scope of easement – determined by the terms of the grant or conditions that created it.
      1. Presumed to be of perpetual duration unless stated otherwise.
      2. The use presumed is that of reasonable development of the dominant estate
        1. e. the development which would likely have been contemplated by the parties at the time the easement was created.
      3. Note – The easement may only be used for the benefit of the dominant estate.
      4. Repairs – The dominant estate is responsible for making any necessary repairs to the easement and may enter the servient estate to do so.
      5. Remedy for Exceeding the scope of the easement – Enjoin the use but does NOT terminate the easement
  • Termination of Easement
    1. Estoppel – servient owner materially changes his position in reasonable reliance on easement holders oral assurances that easement will no longer be enforced. (Dig a swimming pool where easement was after oral promise)
    2. Necessity – expire as soon as the need ends
      1. If the easement attributable to necessity was nonetheless created by express grant, it will not end when the need ends.
    3. Destruction – Involuntary destruction of the structure in which the easement existed.
    4. Condemnation – Condemnation of the servient estate
    5. Releasewritten release given by easement holder to the servient owner
    6. Abandonment – easement holder must demonstrate by physical action of intent to abandon (Leaving alone is not sufficient)
    7. Merger – easement is extinguished when title to easement and title to servient land become vested in the same person. (no auto revival)
    8. Prescription – Adverse continuous interruption of the use for the SOL period.

If you have any issues regarding easements, whether you are the easement holder or the property owner whose property is burdened by the easement, we at the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin are here for you. We have offices in New York City, Brooklyn, NY and Queens, NY. You can call us at 212-233-1233 or send us an email at [email protected].

Attorney Albert Goodwin

Law Offices of
Albert Goodwin, PLLC
31 W 34 Str, Suite 7058
New York, NY 10001

Tel. 212-233-1233

[email protected]

About the Author

Albert Goodwin, Esq. is a licenced New York attorney with over 15 years of courtroom experience. His extensive knowledge and expertise make him well-qualified to write authoritative articles on a wide range of legal topics.

Contact Us









Albert Goodwin gave interviews to and appeared on the following media outlets:

ProPublica Forbes ABC CNBC CBS NBC News Discovery Wall Street Journal NPR

Client Reviews

Verified feedback from our clients

Mr. Goodwin is everything you want in an attorney: professional, honest, thorough, and genuinely caring. He always explains things clearly, so I understood exactly what was happening and what to expect next. His attention to detail and persistence really stood out. Looking back, I feel lucky to have found him. He guided me through the whole process expertly, and I deeply appreciate all his hard work. Would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Sarah M

Legal Services

Thanks to Mr. Albert Goodwin's hard work and smart thinking, I finally won my case, which has been a long time coming. He figured out solutions that no one else could see. I'm really impressed by his strong ethics - something that's rare these days. As my lawyer, he went above and beyond what I expected. I'm so grateful I found him and would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Lawrence H

Estate Law

From our first meeting, I knew I was in great hands with Albert and his associate Katrina. They handled my case with incredible skill and efficiency, even though they took it over from another firm. What impressed me most was how quickly Albert responded to my questions with honest, clear answers - no sugarcoating, just straight talk. They managed a huge workload under tight deadlines, and their fees were very reasonable for such high-quality work. Beyond his legal expertise, Albert's wit and personality made a difficult process much easier to handle. I'm deeply grateful for their hard work and would absolutely choose them again. If you need legal help in New York, you won't find better representation than Albert's firm.

Adam F

Estate Litigation

VIEW MORE
New York State Bar Association Member Badge New York City Bar Association Member Badge American Bar Association Member Badge Avvo Rated Attorney Badge