In New York, an executor or administrator generally could transfer property and make distributions to heirs and beneficiaries seven months after their appointment, the issuance of letters testamentary or letters of administration, without incurring any liability.
What is this period of seven months after an executor or administrator’s appointment? Under SCPA § 1802, a creditor has seven months from the date of issuance of the executor or administrator’s letters to make a claim with the estate. This seven month period begins on the date letters are first issued to a fiduciary, including a temporary or preliminary fiduciary.
During this seven-month period, the executor or administrator must also pay for the debts and other expenses of the estate in the order provided under SCPA § 1811. These expenses, in accordance with order of priority, are:
Distributing the estate assets without paying any of the above shall make the personal representative (executor or administrator) personally liable for such debt. Any amount not recovered from the personal representative shall be taken from the heirs and beneficiaries who received the distributions.
When a personal representative, such as an executor or administrator, distributes properties to an heir or beneficiary prior to the lapse of the seven-month notice period, the personal representative can be liable in case a creditor appears within the said period to file a claim.
If the executor distributes estate assets after the seven-month creditor claim period, he will generally not be liable if a creditor suddenly appears beyond the seven months to make a claim.
However, in Matter of Bailey, 147 Misc.2d 46 (1990), the court held the executor liable for creditor claims made after the seven-month period because the executor did not exercise good faith in the investigation of the existence of possible claims. The alleged good faith distributions to the beneficiaries were debunked when it was shown that the executor was advised of a possibility of a claim less than five months after the issuance of his letters.
In addition, the executor knew that the decedent, his mother, was hospitalized and had home attendants prior to her death. Yet, the executor never investigated whether these hospitalization and home care expenses were paid for. For this reason, the executor was held liable for these hospitalization and home care claims filed after the seven-month period because he was adequately advised or should have known, with due diligence, about the possibility of these claims within the seven-month period.
If the executor acted in good faith and with due diligence in investigating and resolving creditor claims yet was not aware of the existence of any such claim, he may avoid personal liability for the distribution of estate assets after the seven-month period.
If there is any doubt, the executor should seek guidance from an estates attorney to minimize any risk of being personally liable for estate debts. Should you need assistance, we at the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin are here for you. We have offices in New York City, Brooklyn, NY and Queens, NY. You can call us at 212-233-1233 or send us an email at [email protected].
The Bailey case and others have established that the seven-month protection requires the executor to act in good faith. Good faith investigation typically includes:
The executor should document the investigation. Notes about what records were reviewed, who was contacted, and what was found create a record that supports the eventual claim of good faith.
Beyond actual investigation, some executors take the additional step of publishing notice to creditors in a local newspaper. The publication does not change the statutory creditor period, but it does demonstrate good-faith effort to identify creditors and may help the executor address the Bailey-style scrutiny.
The publication is not required and is not always done in New York practice, but it has protective value in larger estates with potentially unknown creditors.
The seven-month rule does not absolutely prohibit any distributions before the period expires. In specific situations, early distributions are appropriate:
For each early distribution, the executor accepts the risk that a late-discovered creditor may force the executor to come up with funds. Where the risk is low (clear excess of assets over known and reasonably anticipated obligations), the early distribution makes sense.
When the executor distributes, the beneficiary signs a receipt and release acknowledging receipt and releasing the executor from further claims. The receipt is the executor's protection against future second-guessing by the beneficiary.
The receipt typically:
Beneficiaries should review the receipt carefully before signing because the release is binding. Concerns about the accounting should be addressed before signing.
If a creditor appears after the seven-month period, the analysis depends on whether the executor acted in good faith:
Good faith with no notice of the claim. The executor is generally protected. The creditor can sue the beneficiaries who received distributions for recovery, but the executor is not personally liable.
Good faith with notice of a potential claim. The executor may have a duty to investigate. If investigation would have revealed the claim, the executor may have liability despite the seven months passing.
Failure to act in good faith. As in Bailey, the executor can be personally liable even after the seven months.
The lesson for executors is that the seven-month period provides protection only if the executor diligently investigates creditors during that period.
Tax claims by the IRS and New York Department of Taxation and Finance have their own rules that are not limited by the seven-month period. The executor remains personally liable for unpaid estate taxes and related obligations. Distributing the estate before tax obligations are fully resolved can leave the executor exposed even years later. This is one reason executors typically wait until tax matters are clearly settled before final distribution.