Yes. A New York Surrogate's Court can suspend, modify, or revoke the letters testamentary of one co-executor and leave the other in office. Courts treat removal as a drastic step. They give weight to the testator's choice of executors, and they rarely remove a fiduciary only because two co-executors do not get along.
This page covers the problems that come up when a will names two or more executors. It is written for two readers: a co-executor who cannot get the other executor to cooperate, and a beneficiary watching two fiduciaries stall or mismanage an estate. For removal of a single executor or an administrator, see our page on removing an administrator in New York. For the general duties every fiduciary owes, see breach of fiduciary duty.
A sole executor who does nothing can be compelled or replaced, and the estate has no other fiduciary in the meantime. With co-executors, one fiduciary is usually ready to act and the other is blocking, absent, or acting alone without authority. The legal questions change as a result:
SCPA 711 allows a removal petition by a co-fiduciary, a creditor, any person interested in the estate, or a person acting on behalf of a minor or other person under a disability. Because a co-executor is named in the statute, you do not need to be a beneficiary to bring the proceeding. You have standing because you share the office.
Beneficiaries have standing as persons interested in the estate. If you are a beneficiary and only one of two executors is the problem, you can ask the court to remove that executor alone and leave the other in place.
Under EPTL 10-10.7, unless the will says otherwise, a power held by three or more fiduciaries may be exercised by a majority. That majority rule does not apply when there are only two. Two co-executors must generally act jointly.
In practice, when two executors are serving:
With three or more executors, a majority can act. A dissenting executor who is required to join in the act can limit personal liability by stating the dissent in writing to the co-fiduciaries at or before the time of joining, as EPTL 10-10.7 provides. If you are outvoted and disagree, put your objection in writing before you sign.
Check the will first. Many wills change the default rule, for example by allowing either executor to act alone, giving one executor the deciding vote, or naming a successor if an executor stops serving.
A deadlock between two executors can freeze an estate. Bills go unpaid, a house sits empty and uninsured, tax deadlines pass, and the beneficiaries receive nothing. The Surrogate's Court has several tools that stop short of removal.
A fiduciary can ask the court for advice and direction on a specific question, such as whether to accept an offer on estate property or how to handle a particular asset. The court has discretion to decline, and it generally will not make ordinary business decisions for the fiduciaries. In appropriate cases, an order of direction can break a disagreement over a defined transaction.
Where a fiduciary is refusing to perform a specific duty, such as signing a document or releasing funds, a proceeding under SCPA 2102 can ask the court to compel performance.
If the dispute is over whether or when to sell a house or apartment, Article 19 of the SCPA provides a court-supervised route to authorize the sale. This is often relevant when one executor is also a beneficiary living in the property. See our page on a beneficiary living in the inherited house.
SCPA 711 allows the court to modify letters as well as revoke them. In some cases the court may restrict what one executor can do, require court approval for certain acts, or require a bond, instead of removing that executor outright.
Some disputes between co-executors are about communication and timing, not misconduct. Several New York Surrogate's Courts refer estate disputes to mediation. A negotiated agreement on a sale, a distribution schedule, or one executor's voluntary resignation is often faster and cheaper than a removal hearing.
This is the issue courts address most often in co-executor cases. Siblings named as co-executors often distrust each other, and many removal petitions are built mainly on that hostility. New York courts generally hold that animosity between co-fiduciaries is not, by itself, grounds for removal. The usual question is whether the conflict is impairing administration of the estate or putting estate assets at risk.
Courts also start from the position that the testator chose these people deliberately. A decedent who named two children to serve together may have known they did not get along. Courts are reluctant to override that choice without clear evidence that the estate is being harmed.
A removal petition is stronger when it shows concrete consequences, for example:
Allegations without documents seldom succeed. The Court of Appeals held in Matter of Duke, 87 N.Y.2d 465 (1996), that a Surrogate generally may not suspend or remove a fiduciary without a hearing unless the misconduct is established by undisputed facts, concessions, the fiduciary's own statements in court, or facts in the court's records. Expect to prove your case.
SCPA 711 lists the grounds on which the court may suspend, modify, or revoke letters. The grounds most relevant to co-executors include:
SCPA 707 sets out who is ineligible to receive letters. It includes a person convicted of a felony, which is different from a person merely charged with a crime. It also includes a minor, a person found incompetent, and certain non-domiciliary aliens, and it allows the court to find a person ineligible because of substance abuse, dishonesty, improvidence, want of understanding, or other unfitness. For more on criminal history, see serving as an executor with a felony conviction.
Self-dealing is a frequent ground. An executor who buys estate property, or sells it to a family member or to a company the executor controls, faces serious scrutiny. Our fiduciary duty page covers self-dealing in more detail.
This is the usual route. You file a verified petition stating the grounds and supporting facts. The court issues a citation requiring the co-executor, and other interested parties, to appear and show cause why letters should not be revoked. If facts are disputed, the case may proceed to discovery and a hearing.
While the petition is pending, the court can suspend the co-executor's letters. Suspension stops the co-executor from acting for the estate until the court decides the petition. If you are a co-executor facing ongoing waste, or a beneficiary watching assets disappear, a request for suspension is often the most useful early step. Courts generally require a strong showing before suspending a fiduciary, consistent with Matter of Duke.
SCPA 719 allows the court to suspend, modify, or revoke letters without a citation in specific situations described in the statute. These include situations where the fiduciary's ineligibility or default is already shown by the court's own records, such as certain failures to comply with court orders, bond requirements, or accounting requirements. Because it bypasses the usual process, courts apply it narrowly.
Co-executors share responsibility for the estate. If you know or should know that your co-executor is misusing estate funds, ignoring obligations, or self-dealing, and you do nothing, you may face surcharge along with the co-executor who caused the loss. Courts look at whether you took reasonable steps to protect the estate.
To protect yourself:
Waiting until the final accounting to raise objections can leave you explaining why you did not act sooner.
The answer depends on the will and the court's order. If the will names a successor executor, that person may seek letters. If no successor is named, the remaining co-executor usually continues to administer the estate alone unless the will requires two fiduciaries. Where no qualified executor remains, the court can appoint an administrator c.t.a. (with the will annexed).
The removed executor must turn over estate assets, records, keys, and documents. If they do not, a turnover proceeding under SCPA 2103 can be used. The court can also compel the removed executor to account for their time in office under SCPA 2205. See our accountings page.
Executor commissions are governed by SCPA 2307. A removed executor's commissions may be reduced or denied where the court finds misconduct or that the executor did not perform the duties of the office. The court decides this, often at the accounting stage.
If the removed executor's conduct caused a loss, the court can surcharge that executor, meaning order the executor to repay the estate personally. A surcharge can be offset against the executor's commissions or the executor's own inheritance, and it can be enforced against personal assets.
Each side generally pays its own lawyer at the outset. Under SCPA 2110, the Surrogate's Court has discretion to fix attorney's fees and to direct that they be paid from the estate or charged against a particular share. Courts consider whether the legal work benefited the estate, along with factors such as time spent, difficulty, and results.
Winning a removal petition does not automatically mean the estate will pay your fees. A fiduciary who defends a removal proceeding in bad faith or causes the litigation through misconduct may be denied reimbursement from the estate, and in some cases may be charged personally. These outcomes are discretionary and vary from case to case.
Timing varies by county and by how hard the case is fought. An uncontested resignation can be resolved in a few months. A contested removal with discovery commonly takes many months and can run longer than a year. For context on general estate timing, see our sample NYC probate timeline.
Removal petitions in New York City are filed in the Surrogate's Court of the county where the will was probated:
Each court has its own calendar practices and conference procedures, so confirm local requirements before filing.
Cost depends mostly on whether the co-executor contests. A negotiated resignation costs far less than a hearing. A contested removal that goes through discovery and a hearing can cost tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, and fee recovery from the estate is not assured. Before filing, weigh the size of the estate, the strength of your documents, and whether a narrower remedy would solve the problem. Removal is one option, and for co-executors it is often not the first one.
If you are a co-executor who cannot get your co-fiduciary to act, or a beneficiary dealing with two executors who cannot agree, we can review the will, the letters, and your records and explain which remedy fits. The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin has offices in New York City, Brooklyn, and Queens. Call 212-233-1233 or email [email protected].
This page provides general information about New York law and is not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the facts of each case and the court's discretion.