If you have already executed a will, you are probably wondering whether you can change the will without the executor knowing?
The good news is that you can change your will as many times as you like without the executor knowing. The will is revocable for as long as you are alive. You do not need to inform your executor that you are changing the will, or even that you are changing your executor. A will can be changed without the executor knowing. The only important thing to remember if you are changing your will is that the new will must be properly executed. Otherwise, if there is no proper execution of the will (which complies with state formalities), the new will may be denied probate, and the old will may be revived.
If you are changing your will, you must inform someone that you are doing so. Whether that someone is the executor depends on you. You don’t want to waste your executor’s resources in petitioning for probate your old will, when you have a new will.
Ultimately, it might be wise to inform the executor that you are changing your will so that, if the executor is still the executor in the new will, the executor will know which will to probate. If the executor is not the executor anymore in the new will, then the executor will know that he does not need to waste resources to probate a will upon your death.
Once you die, the will cannot be changed anymore, whether with or without the executor’s knowledge. Only you have the power to change your will.
If you need assistance in drafting or amending a will or planning your estate, the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin are here for you. We have offices in New York City, Brooklyn, NY and Queens, NY. You can call us at 212-233-1233 or send us an email at [email protected].
There are two basic methods for changing a will in New York: a new will (which entirely replaces the prior one) and a codicil (which amends specific provisions of the existing will while leaving the rest intact). Both must be executed with the same formalities as the original will — EPTL § 3-2.1 applies equally to wills and codicils. That means two witnesses, the testator's signature at the end, publication to the witnesses, and the entire ceremony within 30 days.
New wills are usually preferable to codicils for several reasons. First, a new will makes a clean break from the old one, with no risk of inconsistency between the documents. Second, after several rounds of changes, codicils can accumulate and create confusion about which provisions are still in effect. Third, the time savings of a codicil are usually small — drafting a new will from a current template is not much longer than drafting a codicil that has to fit precisely into an old document.
Every well-drafted new will includes a revocation clause: "I hereby revoke all wills and codicils previously made by me." This clause operates the moment the new will is signed and witnessed. The old will is no longer legally effective.
In addition to the revocation clause, New York law recognizes revocation by physical act under EPTL § 3-4.1. The testator can revoke an old will by tearing it, burning it, cutting it, canceling it, obliterating it, or otherwise destroying it with the intent to revoke. The physical act must be done by the testator personally or by someone else in the testator's presence and at the testator's direction.
The safer approach is to leave revocation to the new will's revocation clause rather than relying on a physical act. Physical-act revocations can be ambiguous — was the will torn deliberately or by accident? If only part of the will was destroyed, was the testator trying to revoke the whole or just a part? These ambiguities lead to litigation.
If a new will is executed but is later denied probate because of an execution defect, lack of capacity, undue influence, or another problem, the question becomes whether the older will is revived. The answer depends on what the new will did and what the testator did.
New York follows the doctrine of "dependent relative revocation." If the testator revoked the old will only conditionally, expecting the new will to take effect, and the new will fails, the old will may be revived to give effect to the testator's overall intent. The doctrine is fact-specific and depends on what the court can determine about the testator's intent.
Where the doctrine does not apply, the failure of the new will can mean the testator dies intestate — without an effective will. The estate then passes by intestacy under EPTL § 4-1.1. This is often a worse result than either the old will or the intended new will, which is one of many reasons careful execution of new wills matters.
Testators sometimes want to change their wills without the named executor knowing because they are also changing the executor. Telling the existing executor that they are being replaced can be awkward, particularly in family situations. The law does not require that the existing executor be informed. The testator's freedom to make a new will and name a new executor is unfettered.
That said, there are practical reasons to consider telling at least one person — and ideally the new executor — that a change has happened. If the executor named in the new will does not know about it, and the old executor has the original of the old will, the wrong will may be presented for probate. This creates a contest that could have been avoided.
Once a new will is signed, the question becomes what to do with the old one. There are two camps. Some attorneys recommend destroying the old will to eliminate the possibility of confusion. Other attorneys recommend keeping the old will, clearly marked as superseded, to document the chain of testamentary intent and to provide evidence if a contest arises and the doctrine of dependent relative revocation becomes relevant.
We generally recommend the second approach. Keep the old will, write "SUPERSEDED" or "REVOKED" prominently on each page, and store it separately from the current will. Bring both to your estate planning attorney's attention so they have the complete history of your planning.
When a will is changed, other estate planning documents often need to be changed too. The power of attorney may name the same agent who is being removed as executor. The health care proxy may need updating. Beneficiary designations on retirement accounts and life insurance may need to be aligned with the new will. Revocable trusts may need amendments. Taking a holistic view of the planning ensures consistency across all the documents.
Changes to a will made late in the testator's life, particularly changes that disinherit a family member or substantially change the distribution, attract scrutiny in later contests. Family members who lose out may argue that the change was the product of undue influence, fraud, or lack of capacity at the time of the change. We document late-in-life will changes carefully — through detailed engagement notes, medical examinations contemporaneous with the change, video recording of the execution when appropriate, and gathering of evidence to support the testator's capacity and free will.
These protective steps make later challenges much harder to win. A change documented carefully at the time, by an attorney who has worked with the testator over time and can speak to the consistency of the testator's intent, is a strong defense against post-death attacks.
A testator who has been diagnosed with dementia or another cognitive impairment can still execute a valid will if the testator has testamentary capacity at the time of execution. Testamentary capacity is a specific legal standard that is lower than the capacity required for many other transactions — the testator must understand the nature and extent of the estate, know the natural objects of bounty, and understand that they are making a will. A testator who is generally impaired may still meet this standard during lucid intervals.
Executing a will for a testator with questionable capacity requires careful documentation. We typically obtain a contemporaneous letter or report from a physician confirming testamentary capacity, conduct the execution in conditions that minimize distractions and pressure, and may video record the proceedings. The goal is to create a record that supports the will against future challenges.