One of the most common - and most misunderstood - questions in New York estate administration is deceptively simple: when a lawyer is hired to handle a probate or administration, who is that lawyer's actual client? Is it the estate itself, or the individual serving as executor or administrator? The answer matters enormously, because it determines who the attorney must protect, who can rely on the attorney's advice, who is bound by attorney-client privilege, and who has to hire separate counsel when a dispute arises.
The short, legally precise answer is this: in New York, counsel retained to administer an estate generally represents the fiduciary personally - the executor or administrator - not the estate as a separate legal entity. The estate is not a person and cannot, by itself, retain or instruct a lawyer. The fiduciary does. But the fiduciary owes duties to the estate and its beneficiaries, and so the attorney's work is performed for the benefit of the estate even though the formal client is the individual fiduciary. Understanding that distinction is the key to everything that follows.
An estate in New York is not a legal entity that can sue, be sued, hold a lawyer, or give instructions on its own. It is a body of assets and liabilities administered by a fiduciary appointed by the Surrogate's Court - an executor under a will (issued Letters Testamentary) or an administrator where there is no will (issued Letters of Administration) under the Letters Testamentary and Letters of Administration procedures of the Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (SCPA).
Because the estate cannot act for itself, the lawyer's client is the human being holding the letters. New York courts have repeatedly recognized that an attorney retained by a fiduciary represents the fiduciary individually in that capacity, not the beneficiaries and not the estate as an abstract entity. This is sometimes loosely described as the attorney "representing the estate," and that shorthand is fine in casual conversation - but it is legally imprecise and can be dangerous if a fiduciary or a beneficiary relies on it to decide who is protecting their interests.
Under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR Part 1200), the attorney's core duties of loyalty, confidentiality, and competence run to the client - here, the fiduciary. Rule 1.6 protects communications between the lawyer and the fiduciary as privileged. Rule 1.7 governs concurrent conflicts of interest, which becomes critical the moment the fiduciary's personal interests diverge from those of the beneficiaries.
This means that when an executor consults estate counsel about a contested decision, those conversations are generally privileged as between the lawyer and the executor. Beneficiaries are not entitled to demand them simply because the legal fees may ultimately be paid from estate funds. A beneficiary who assumes the estate lawyer is "their" lawyer too is making a costly mistake.
The nuance that trips people up is this: while the fiduciary is the client, the fiduciary's own legal obligations require that the administration be conducted for the benefit of the estate and its beneficiaries. The executor or administrator owes fiduciary duties of loyalty, prudence, and impartiality under New York's Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL) and is accountable to the Surrogate's Court. The attorney's job is to help the fiduciary discharge those duties lawfully - marshaling assets, paying valid creditor claims, complying with the notice and accounting requirements of the SCPA, filing estate tax returns, and ultimately distributing what remains under the will or, intestate, under EPTL 4-1.1.
So the lawyer serves the estate through the fiduciary. The benefit flows to the estate, but the professional relationship - and the privilege - sits with the individual fiduciary.
Because the work benefits the estate, the attorney's reasonable legal fees are typically charged to and paid from estate assets, subject to the Surrogate's review of reasonableness under SCPA 2110 and 2111. The court can fix and even reduce a fee it finds excessive or unrelated to the proper administration of the estate.
The critical limitation: legal fees incurred to defend the fiduciary's personal wrongdoing are not chargeable to the estate. If an executor is sued for breaching fiduciary duty and the litigation is genuinely about protecting the estate, fees may be allowable. But if the fiduciary loses - if the court finds the fiduciary misappropriated funds, self-dealt, or otherwise breached - the fiduciary generally must bear those defense costs personally, and may be surcharged. This is why the question "who pays the lawyer" can never be answered in the abstract; it depends on what the lawyer was defending and how the matter ends.
The most important practical takeaway for an executor or administrator is recognizing when the estate's administration lawyer can no longer also defend you personally. Conflicts arise when:
In these situations, the attorney whose engagement was to administer the estate may need to withdraw from defending the fiduciary's personal conduct, because defending alleged misconduct is not the same as administering the estate. The fiduciary should then retain independent personal counsel. Disputes over removal and accountings are addressed in detail on our pages about removing an administrator or executor and breach of fiduciary duty.
Beneficiaries and distributees frequently believe that the lawyer handling the estate is also looking out for them. They are not. The estate attorney represents the fiduciary. If you are a beneficiary and you are concerned about how the estate is being handled, you should consider your own counsel when:
Retaining your own attorney protects your standing, preserves your objections, and ensures someone is advancing your interests rather than the fiduciary's.
Suppose a Brooklyn executor, advised by estate counsel, sells the decedent's Park Slope brownstone. If the executor obtains an appraisal, lists it appropriately, and sells at fair value on counsel's advice, and a beneficiary later objects, the executor's defense of that decision generally relates to proper administration - and estate counsel can typically defend it, with fees chargeable to the estate subject to SCPA 2110 review.
Now change the facts: the executor sells the same brownstone quietly to a relative for far below market value, against counsel's advice. A beneficiary brings a turnover or surcharge proceeding alleging breach of fiduciary duty. Here the executor's interests have diverged from the estate's. Estate counsel may need to withdraw from defending the executor's personal conduct, the executor should retain personal counsel, and if the executor loses, those defense fees will likely fall on the executor personally rather than the estate.
Generally no. The estate attorney represents the fiduciary, and the New York Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit representation where there is a concurrent conflict of interest. If your interests as a beneficiary diverge from the executor's, you should retain your own counsel.
It depends on the nature of the claim and the outcome. Fees to defend the proper administration of the estate may be charged to the estate subject to court review under SCPA 2110. But if the executor is defending personal misconduct and loses, the executor typically must pay those fees personally and may be surcharged.
Communications between the fiduciary and estate counsel are generally privileged under Rule 1.6. Beneficiaries are not automatically entitled to those communications simply because the fee is paid from estate funds.
No. The estate is not a legal entity that can retain or instruct counsel. Only the appointed fiduciary - the executor or administrator holding letters from the Surrogate's Court - can engage the attorney.
Joint representation is generally inadvisable and often impermissible because the fiduciary and beneficiary roles carry potentially adverse interests. Even where it might be allowed, it requires informed written consent and evaporates the moment a genuine conflict appears.
Whether you are an executor wondering how far your lawyer will protect you, or a beneficiary deciding whether to hire your own counsel, the representation question deserves a precise answer based on your specific facts. Should you need legal representation regarding estate matters, you can call the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin at 212-233-1233 or send us an email at [email protected].
We represent estate clients throughout the State of New York, including all five boroughs of New York City (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, The Bronx, and Staten Island), Long Island, and Upstate New York.
About the Author: Albert Goodwin, Esq. is a New York estate, trust, and Surrogate's Court litigation attorney and the principal of the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin. He practices in probate, estate administration, fiduciary disputes, and contested accountings throughout New York City, Long Island, and Upstate New York.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reviewing or updating your understanding of New York law should be done with counsel familiar with your specific circumstances. Last reviewed and updated for accuracy with current New York SCPA, EPTL, and Rules of Professional Conduct provisions.