Written by Albert Goodwin, Esq., an attorney admitted in New York who practices estate administration and estate litigation in New York City. Last reviewed: 2025. This page is general information about New York law and is not legal advice for your situation.
Your boyfriend died. You lived with him in the house. Now his brother says the house is his and wants you out. Who is right depends on three things: how the deed reads, whether there is a will, and what you can prove about any agreement you had with your boyfriend. This page walks through each of those questions under New York law, explains how an eviction against you would actually work, and sets out what to do in the first thirty days.
New York gives almost no automatic protection to a romantic partner who was not married to the person who died. You are not a spouse for purposes of intestacy. You are not a distributee under EPTL 4-1.1. You have no elective share under EPTL 5-1.1-A. You have no automatic right to the home, the furniture, the car, or any other asset held in his sole name.
The length of the relationship does not change this. Living together for twenty years does not change it. Registering as domestic partners with the New York City Clerk does not change it, because the city registry confers no inheritance rights under state law. New York has not recognized common-law marriage since 1933, so you cannot become a spouse after the fact by proving you lived as one.
What you do have is the ability to enforce an actual agreement and to recover money or property that would be unjust for the estate to keep. Those claims are described below. Before you get there, you need to answer two factual questions.
Pull the deed. In the five boroughs other than Staten Island, deeds are recorded with the New York City Register and are searchable for free on ACRIS. Staten Island deeds are recorded with the Richmond County Clerk. Outside the city, go to the County Clerk of the county where the house sits. The deed controls, regardless of what anyone remembers being said.
Joint tenancy with right of survivorship: The deed names both of you and uses the words "joint tenants with right of survivorship" or similar language. When one joint tenant dies, the survivor owns the whole property by operation of law. Nothing passes through the estate. The brother, the will, and the intestacy statute are irrelevant to the house. You should record a certified copy of the death certificate, usually with a short affidavit, with the City Register or County Clerk so that the public record and any future title search show you as sole owner. Keep paying the mortgage, taxes, and insurance.
Tenancy in common: The deed names both of you but says nothing about survivorship, or says "tenants in common." Under EPTL 6-2.2, a conveyance to two or more people who are not married creates a tenancy in common unless the deed expressly creates a joint tenancy. Your share is yours. His share passes under his will or to his distributees. If the brother ends up owning the other half, you and he are co-owners, and either of you can bring a partition action under RPAPL Article 9 to force a sale or a buyout. See our pages on partition of real property and buying out an inherited residence.
Tenancy by the entirety: This form of ownership is available only to married couples. If an old deed to you and your boyfriend describes you as husband and wife, that mistake does not create a tenancy by the entirety. Courts generally treat such a deed as creating a joint tenancy if the survivorship intent is clear, and otherwise a tenancy in common. Get a lawyer to review the exact wording.
His name alone: The house is an estate asset. Go to question two.
If there is a will, it governs who gets the house. If the will leaves the house to you, you are a devisee and the executor must deliver it to you after probate, subject to the estate's debts. If the brother or anyone else is holding a will and refusing to produce it, a person interested in the will can petition the Surrogate's Court under SCPA 1401 to compel its production.
If there is no will, the house passes by intestacy under EPTL 4-1.1(a). The order matters, because each class cuts off the ones below it:
Two points follow from this list. First, if you and your boyfriend had children together, those children inherit the house, not the brother. The brother is not a distributee at all. As the children's parent you can seek appointment as guardian of their property and, through that, control the administration. Second, if either of his parents is alive, the parent inherits before the brother. A brother only takes if there is no spouse, no child, and no living parent. Many brothers assert ownership without knowing this.
Note also that title to real property vests in the distributees at the moment of death, subject to the administrator's power under EPTL 11-1.1 to sell it to pay debts and administer the estate. The brother cannot sell the house to a third party until someone has letters of administration, and if he is not the sole distributee he cannot sell it alone even then.
If you are not on the deed and not named in a will, your legal status in the house after his death is that of a licensee. You lived there with the owner's permission. The permission ended when he died. A licensee has no lease and no tenancy, but a licensee still cannot be removed by self-help. RPAPL 768 makes it a crime in New York City to use force, change the locks, or shut off utilities to put out someone who has lived in a dwelling for thirty days or more. Outside the city, RPAPL 853 gives you a civil claim for treble damages for a forcible or unlawful eviction.
The lawful route is a summary holdover proceeding under RPAPL 713(7), which covers a licensee whose license has expired or been revoked. Here is how it works:
While you remain, expect the estate to demand use and occupancy, meaning a fair rental value for the period after death. Keep records of what you pay.
If you are not on the deed, you need a legal theory that gives you an interest in the house or a right to money from the estate. New York recognizes the following, each with limits you should understand before relying on it.
In Morone v. Morone, 50 N.Y.2d 481 (1980), the Court of Appeals held that an express agreement between unmarried partners is enforceable, as long as sexual relations are not the consideration for it. The same case refused to recognize a contract implied from the relationship itself. The court will not infer from the fact that you cooked, cleaned, raised children, or paid bills that he agreed to give you the house. You need an actual promise, and you need to prove it.
Two writing requirements get in the way of oral promises. A promise to leave you the house when he died is a contract to make a testamentary provision, and under EPTL 13-2.1(a)(2) it is unenforceable unless it is in a signed writing. A promise to convey an interest in real property during life must satisfy General Obligations Law 5-703. A signed cohabitation agreement, a letter, a text message that clearly states the promise, or a signed statement to a lender can satisfy these rules. A conversation on the porch cannot.
Equity can impose a constructive trust on property even without a writing. Sharp v. Kosmalski, 40 N.Y.2d 119 (1976), sets out the four elements New York courts look for: a confidential or fiduciary relationship, a promise, a transfer made in reliance on the promise, and unjust enrichment. Long-term cohabitation generally satisfies the first element. The fight is over the second and third. You must show that you gave something, such as money toward the down payment, mortgage payments, or paying for a renovation, because of an understanding that the house was partly yours. Courts have granted constructive trusts to unmarried partners on these facts and have denied them where the contributions looked like ordinary shared living expenses.
The limitations period is six years under CPLR 213(1), measured from the wrongful act, which in this setting is usually the death or the estate's refusal to honor the promise. Do not let a holdover drag on for years without filing. The claim belongs in Supreme Court, or in Surrogate's Court once an estate proceeding is open, because Surrogate's Court has jurisdiction over disputes about what belongs to the estate.
If you cannot prove a promise strong enough for a constructive trust, you may still recover the money you put into the house as a claim against the estate. Present the claim in writing to the administrator under SCPA 1803. If the fiduciary rejects it, you can have it tried in the Surrogate's Court accounting proceeding or sue on it, subject to the deadlines in SCPA 1810. A money claim does not keep you in the house, but it reduces what the brother walks away with.
One rule shapes every one of these claims. CPLR 4519 bars a party with an interest in the outcome from testifying against the estate about a personal transaction or conversation with the decedent. In plain terms, you generally cannot take the stand and say "he told me the house was ours." You need bank records, cancelled checks, emails, texts, the contractor's invoice you paid, and witnesses who heard him say it. Start collecting those now.
Most mortgages contain a due-on-sale clause. The federal Garn-St Germain Act, 12 U.S.C. 1701j-3(d), bars the lender from enforcing that clause on certain transfers at death. The exceptions that matter here are a transfer by operation of law on the death of a joint tenant and a transfer to a relative resulting from the borrower's death. If you were a joint tenant, the lender cannot call the loan because he died; you step into the loan as a successor in interest, and the federal mortgage servicing rules in 12 C.F.R. Part 1024 require the servicer to communicate with you and consider you for loss mitigation once you confirm your status. If you were not on the deed and not a relative, the lender has no obligation to let you assume the loan, though many will negotiate. If no one pays, the lender can foreclose regardless of the family dispute. Whoever expects to keep the house should keep the mortgage current and keep proof of every payment.
Yes, and this is often the practical resolution. Once letters issue, the administrator has power under EPTL 11-1.1(b)(5) to sell estate real property, and nothing prevents a sale to the decedent's partner at a fair price. If the brother is the sole distributee, he can sell you his interest directly. If you are a tenant in common with the estate, a negotiated buyout avoids a partition action and the costs of a forced sale. Your constructive trust or contribution claim becomes a bargaining chip: an estate facing a credible claim will often credit it against the purchase price rather than litigate.
These are hypotheticals, not case results, and the outcome in any actual matter depends on the evidence.
Partner on the deed as a joint tenant with right of survivorship: A couple bought a two-family house in Queens in both names as joint tenants with right of survivorship. He died without a will. His brother demanded the house as the "only family." Likely outcome: the surviving partner owns the house outright. She records the death certificate, continues the mortgage as a successor in interest, and the brother has no claim to the house, though he may be a distributee of other assets in the estate.
Partner paid half the mortgage for ten years but is not on the deed: The house was in his name alone. She can prove, with bank statements, that she paid half of every mortgage payment and funded a new roof. There is no writing about ownership. His parents are deceased; his brother is the sole distributee. Likely outcome: the brother can bring a holdover after obtaining letters, but she has a colorable constructive trust claim under Sharp v. Kosmalski that may justify a stay. Her realistic result is either an equitable interest in the house or a money recovery for her contributions, and the case usually settles with a buyout in one direction or the other.
Partner with a signed cohabitation agreement: The couple signed an agreement, prepared by a lawyer, stating that if either died the survivor could remain in the house for life and that the survivor would receive half the net equity on any sale. He died without a will. Likely outcome: the agreement is an express contract enforceable under Morone, and the writing satisfies EPTL 13-2.1. The brother takes his intestate share subject to her contractual rights, and she can enforce the agreement against the estate.
His claim is only as good as its legal basis. To take the house he must show one of the following:
If none of these applies, he has no standing to evict you or to sell, and his demands can be refused in writing. If one of them does apply, your task shifts to asserting your own claims and negotiating from a position of knowledge rather than fear.
No. New York prohibits self-help eviction of someone who has lived in a dwelling for thirty days or more. The family must serve a ten-day notice to quit under RPAPL 713(7), file a holdover proceeding, win a judgment, and have a marshal or sheriff execute a warrant after a fourteen-day notice. In practice they usually need letters of administration before a court will hear the case.
There is no fixed period. From the first notice, a contested New York City holdover commonly runs several months, and a court can stay the warrant for up to a year under RPAPL 753 if you cannot find comparable housing and you pay use and occupancy. A pending ownership claim in Supreme Court can extend the timeline further. Staying will usually cost you fair rental value for the period.
Not automatic ones. You can enforce a written promise under Morone v. Morone, seek a constructive trust under Sharp v. Kosmalski if you contributed to the property in reliance on an understanding of ownership, and file a claim against the estate under SCPA 1803 for money you put in. Each depends on documents and witnesses, because CPLR 4519 limits your own testimony about what he said.
No. Under EPTL 4-1.1(a)(3), children inherit everything when there is no spouse. Siblings take nothing. You can petition to be appointed guardian of the children's property and seek letters of administration on their behalf.
Not for inheritance. The city registry affects certain benefits and housing succession rights in rent-regulated apartments, but it does not make you a spouse or a distributee under state law.
The first weeks after a partner's death decide a lot: whether the record of your contributions survives, whether you keep possession, and whether the estate opens with or without your participation. The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin handles estate administration, Surrogate's Court litigation, and disputes over inherited real property in New York City and Long Island. We can review the deed, assess the brother's standing, and tell you which of the claims above the evidence supports. Call 212-233-1233 or email [email protected]. Offices in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens.