
As a general rule, can an executor override a will? No. An executor is the person named in the will by the testator who is tasked to administer the testator’s estate upon death. The executor’s job is to carry out the wishes of the testator, and the wishes of the testator are embodied in his last will and testament.
Although the executor cannot override the will’s provisions, there are instances when the executor may deviate from the execution of the will’s provisions, such as:
When a beneficiary feels that the executor is acting contrary to the will’s provisions or has breached his fiduciary duties, the beneficiary can compel the executor to submit an accounting, and the beneficiary can file objections to the accounting. If proven that the executor has mismanaged the assets, the executor can be liable for damages.
The executor’s first duty is to follow the law when executing the will’s provisions. If a beneficiary seeks to be paid first before taxes are paid, that is a violation of the law, and the executor, in good faith, can override the beneficiary’s wishes. If there is a gray area, for example, the executor would like to sell real property of the estate to his relative, the executor should seek legal counsel so that he or she would not be accused of self-dealing. If found to be self-dealing, the executor can be compelled by the court to pay back all the assets used in the self-dealing transaction.
If there is any doubt at all in the execution of the will’s provisions, or there is an issue involving where someone wants to know can an executor override a will, always consult a lawyer with expertise in that particular subject matter.
If you are in need of an estates lawyer, we, at the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin, are here for you. We have offices in New York City, Brooklyn, NY and Queens, NY. You can call us at 212-233-1233 or send us an email at [email protected].
The relationship between the executor and the will is sometimes misunderstood by both executors and beneficiaries. The will is the controlling document. It expresses the testator's wishes about how the estate should be distributed. The executor is the agent who carries out those wishes. The executor's authority is derivative — it comes from the will (and the court's issuance of letters), not from the executor's own judgment.
Within that framework, the executor has substantial discretion in implementation. The executor decides when to sell assets, which assets to sell first, when to make distributions, how to deal with creditors, and similar operational matters. These decisions are exercises of the executor's discretion within the will's framework, not overrides of the will.
One reason an executor may legitimately not deliver what the will appears to direct is the doctrine of ademption. When the will makes a specific bequest of a particular item (a specific car, a specific painting, a specific property), and that item is no longer in the estate at the testator's death, the bequest "adeems" — it fails entirely. The beneficiary of the specific bequest gets nothing.
Ademption applies whether the testator sold the item, gave it away, lost it, or had it destroyed. The exception is ademption by satisfaction — where the testator gave the item to the beneficiary during the testator's lifetime, treating the lifetime gift as satisfying the testamentary gift.
From the beneficiary's perspective, ademption can feel like the executor "overriding" the will. The will said the beneficiary would get the property, but the executor is not delivering it. The reality is that the property is not in the estate to be delivered.
Abatement is the legal doctrine that controls when an estate has insufficient assets to fully pay all the bequests and debts. The order of abatement is typically:
Within each category, bequests typically reduce pro rata. The executor implements abatement as the will and the law direct. Again, this can feel like overriding the will from the beneficiary's perspective, but it is actually the application of established doctrine to the will's terms.
One legitimate way to deviate from a will's literal terms is through beneficiary consent. If all the affected beneficiaries agree in writing to a variation, the executor can implement the variation without violating the will. Common variations:
For consent-based variations to be effective, all affected beneficiaries must consent — not just the ones who benefit from the variation. The executor should obtain the consents in writing and may want court approval for substantial variations.
When the will is ambiguous or impossible to literally apply, the executor can seek court instructions through a construction or reformation proceeding. The court interprets the will and tells the executor what to do. The court's order then governs — the executor follows the order rather than trying to interpret the will independently.
Court-approved deviations are protective. An executor who follows a court order is generally immune from later claims that the executor mishandled the implementation. This is the safest route when there is genuine uncertainty about the will's meaning or application.
An executor cannot use their position to favor themselves. Self-dealing transactions — selling estate property to the executor at below-market prices, paying the executor unauthorized compensation, transferring estate funds to the executor's personal accounts — are violations of fiduciary duty, not legitimate exercises of executor discretion.
The standard for self-dealing is strict. Even transactions that are at fair value but involve the executor as a counterparty are suspect. The executor should either avoid these transactions entirely or obtain court approval before proceeding. Beneficiaries who discover self-dealing transactions after the fact can sue for surcharge.
If you are a beneficiary who believes the executor is not following the will:
Executors who are uncertain about an action they are considering should: