By Albert Goodwin, Esq., New York estate attorney. Last reviewed: [month year].
An executor in New York may sell estate property to a relative. The sale is lawful if it is made at fair market value, after genuine exposure to the market, and if the executor does not personally gain from it. The closer the buyer's finances are to the executor's own, the harder the court looks at the sale, and the less the objecting beneficiary has to prove. This guide covers each type of buyer: the executor's spouse, child, sibling or parent, the executor's own company, and the executor personally. It also shows how a surcharge is calculated, how to ask the Surrogate's Court for advance approval under SCPA 2107, and what records an executor should keep.
Under EPTL 11-1.1(b)(5)(B), a fiduciary whose letters carry no limitation may sell real property that the will does not specifically devise, at public or private sale, on the terms the fiduciary considers most advantageous to the beneficiaries. The beneficiaries do not have to consent. The same power covers personal property, including shares in a cooperative apartment.
The power is held in trust for the beneficiaries. The Court of Appeals in Meinhard v. Salmon, 249 N.Y. 458 (1928), described the fiduciary standard as "the punctilio of an honor the most sensitive." In Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 73 N.Y.2d 461 (1989), the court applied that standard to an executor and held that a fiduciary owes undivided loyalty and may not place himself in a position where his personal interest conflicts with the estate's without full disclosure and consent. In Matter of Rothko, 43 N.Y.2d 305 (1977), executors who sold estate paintings to a gallery in which one of them had an interest were surcharged, and the court measured the loss by the appreciated value of the property rather than its value on the date of the sale.
New York courts do not apply a fixed list of permitted and forbidden relatives. They ask whether the executor, directly or indirectly, gained from the sale. The answer places the transaction in one of two categories.
Which category applies depends on facts, not labels. A sale to a spouse with whom the executor shares a household and bank accounts is treated as self-dealing because the executor's benefit is obvious. A sale to an adult child with independent finances is usually treated as a conflict of interest. A sale to a child who then repays a loan to the executor, or who holds title as a straw buyer, is self-dealing regardless of the family label.
A spouse is the clearest case of indirect benefit. Married couples in New York commonly hold property as tenants by the entirety, file joint returns and pool income. A sale of estate real estate to the executor's spouse at a discount puts the discount into the executor's household. Courts therefore treat the spouse as standing in the executor's shoes, and the beneficiary who objects generally does not have to prove a loss. The executor must show that the will authorized the sale, that the court approved it in advance, or that every beneficiary consented after full disclosure.
An executor who wants to sell to a spouse, and who does not have authorization in the will, should petition under SCPA 2107 before signing a contract. The procedure is described below.
A sale to an adult child is not misconduct on its face. The child is a separate person with separate finances. The objecting beneficiary must prove that the estate received less than it should have, and that the shortfall resulted from the executor's conduct. The usual proof is an independent appraisal fixing fair market value on the date of sale, compared with the contract price.
The analysis changes if the executor benefited through the child. Examples include a child who lives in the house with the executor, a child who pays the purchase price with money the executor gave or lent, a child who later transfers the property back to the executor, and a child who was a minor at the time of sale. In those situations the court treats the sale as self-dealing and the burden shifts to the executor.
Sale terms count as much as price. A contract at appraised value that gives the child seller financing at below-market interest, a long closing date with no deposit, or a waiver of a mortgage contingency that other buyers would not have received, can produce a loss to the estate even though the headline number looks right.
A sale to the executor's brother, sister, parent or cousin is analyzed the same way as a sale to a child. The beneficiary must prove a loss unless the facts show that the executor shared in the buyer's gain. The practical risk is higher when the relative is also a beneficiary of the estate, because the other beneficiaries will compare the price the relative paid with the share the relative is also receiving. If the relative is a co-beneficiary, the executor may instead distribute the property in kind to that beneficiary against his share at appraised value, with an equalizing payment, which keeps the transaction inside the accounting rather than outside it. See our page on a buyout of an inherited residence.
A sale to a corporation, LLC or partnership that the executor owns or controls is self-dealing. The entity is a separate legal person, but the executor's gain through it is direct. The same is true of a sale to an entity owned by the executor's spouse. A minority interest does not cure the problem if the executor had a say in the purchase. Rothko involved exactly this pattern: a sale by executors to a gallery in which one executor had a financial stake. The sale is voidable, the executor can be surcharged for the estate's loss measured at the later, higher value, and the executor cannot charge his defense costs to the estate.
An executor may not sell estate property to himself unless the will expressly permits it or the court approves it in advance. A sale by an executor to himself is voidable at the beneficiaries' election without proof that the price was low. The will clause must be specific. A general clause exonerating the executor from liability does not help: under EPTL 11-1.7(a)(1), a provision that attempts to exonerate an executor from liability for failing to exercise reasonable care, diligence and prudence is void as against public policy.
SCPA 711 lists the grounds for removing an executor. They include wasting or improperly applying estate assets, improvidence, dishonesty and unfitness. SCPA 719 lets the court remove a fiduciary without a petition in certain cases, such as a fiduciary who disobeys a court order.
A conflict of interest, standing alone, is not a ground for removal. In Matter of Marsh, 179 A.D.2d 578 (1st Dept 1992), the court held that a potential conflict between a fiduciary and the estate, without actual misconduct, does not warrant removal. The Court of Appeals in Matter of Duke, 87 N.Y.2d 465 (1996), stressed that the testator's choice of executor is entitled to deference and that removal is a drastic remedy reserved for a clear showing of statutory grounds. A sale to a child at fair value, properly marketed, will not get an executor removed. A sale to a child at a discount that cost the estate money is a misapplication of assets and can.
Removal proceedings are covered on our page on removing an administrator or executor.
A surcharge is a sum the court orders a fiduciary to pay from personal funds to make up a loss caused by the fiduciary's negligence or misconduct. It is usually imposed in an accounting proceeding after a beneficiary files objections.
Assume the following facts in a Queens County estate:
The beneficiaries object. The court finds that the house was not exposed to the market and that $900,000 was obtainable. The surcharge is calculated as follows.
If the facts showed that the son was a straw buyer and the executor took title back, the court would treat the sale as self-dealing. Under Rothko, the measure of damages in that case can be the value of the property at the time of the accounting, not the value at the time of the sale. If the house is worth $1,100,000 by then, the surcharge is $350,000 plus interest, or the beneficiaries can elect to have the sale set aside and the house returned.
We handle surcharge proceedings for beneficiaries and for fiduciaries. See our page on fiduciary surcharge.
An executor who successfully defends an accounting may pay reasonable legal fees from the estate, subject to the court's review under SCPA 2110. An executor who is found to have breached a fiduciary duty generally may not. Fees incurred defending the executor's personal conduct, as opposed to administering the estate, are charged to the executor personally. A fiduciary who sold to a relative at a discount therefore faces three costs: the surcharge, loss of commissions, and his own legal bills.
SCPA 2107 allows a fiduciary to ask the Surrogate's Court, before acting, for direction as to the value, manner and time of sale of estate property, and for advice and direction where extraordinary circumstances make the fiduciary's course of action doubtful. A fiduciary who follows the court's direction in good faith is protected from surcharge on the matters the court decided. For a sale to a spouse, to the executor's own company, or to a child on terms a stranger would not get, this is the strongest protection available.
The petition is filed in the Surrogate's Court of the county that issued letters. It should contain:
If a beneficiary is a minor or under a disability, the court will appoint a guardian ad litem under SCPA 403 to review the proposed sale. A decree approving the sale binds the beneficiaries who were cited. The process takes a few months in most counties and costs the filing fee plus legal fees, which are modest compared with a later surcharge proceeding.
Without court approval, the executor's protection is the record. The following documents, kept in the estate file, prove that the sale was at arm's length.
If the relative's offer is accepted, the file should show why it beat the alternatives. A higher net price, an all-cash offer, or a faster closing on a vacant property paying taxes and insurance are legitimate reasons. The executor should write them down at the time, not reconstruct them later.
A release signed by a beneficiary bars that beneficiary from later objecting to the sale, but only if the release was informed. The executor must disclose the buyer's relationship, the price, the terms, and the appraisal, and must give the beneficiary an opportunity to consult a lawyer. A release obtained by concealing the buyer's identity, or by pressure, is set aside. A release from an adult beneficiary does not bind a minor, an unborn or unascertained beneficiary, or a beneficiary under a disability; those interests require court approval. Releases also do not bind creditors of the estate.
A beneficiary who believes the executor sold estate property to a relative at a loss has several routes.
The six-year period for an equitable claim against a fiduciary under CPLR 213 does not begin to run until the fiduciary openly repudiates the fiduciary relationship or the relationship ends, usually by a judicial settlement of the account. Matter of Barabash, 31 N.Y.2d 76 (1972). A sale closed years ago can still be challenged if the executor has never accounted.
In Manhattan, Brooklyn and Queens, estate property is often a cooperative apartment. The executor sells the shares and assigns the proprietary lease, and the buyer must pass the board. A relative's board approval does not substitute for market exposure. The executor should still obtain an appraisal, list the apartment, and document offers. A board's rejection of an unrelated buyer at a higher price, followed by approval of the executor's child at a lower price, should be documented with the board's written decision so that the record explains the outcome. Condominium sales follow the real property rules above, with the board's right of first refusal noted in the file.
| Buyer | Usual treatment | What the objecting beneficiary must show | Executor's protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executor personally | Self-dealing | The relationship | Will authorization, SCPA 2107 approval, or informed consent of all beneficiaries |
| Executor's company | Self-dealing | The executor's interest in the entity | Same as above |
| Spouse | Self-dealing in most households | The marriage and shared finances | Same as above |
| Adult child, sibling, parent | Conflict of interest | A loss to the estate caused by the executor | Appraisal, broker listing, documented offers, disclosure to beneficiaries, or SCPA 2107 approval |
| Relative who is a straw buyer for the executor | Self-dealing | The executor's benefit through the relative | None short of prior court approval |
If you are a beneficiary who suspects that an executor's sale to a relative cost the estate money, or an executor who is planning such a sale and wants to do it in a way that will withstand objections in the Surrogate's Court, call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected]. We represent clients in the Surrogate's Courts of New York City, Long Island and Westchester.