In New York, you can add a child as a beneficiary in a will. However, it's crucial to note that when a child in New York receives more than $10,000 , whether through a will, life insurance, a personal injury settlement, or any other means, a petition for guardianship of the property must be filed with the Surrogate's Court.
If a child is bequeathed an amount exceeding $10,000 in a will and no guardian is designated in the will, a petition for guardianship must be submitted to enable the guardian to receive the inheritance on behalf of the child. Conversely, if a guardian is already specified in the will, the Surrogate's Court may approve the appointment of said guardian upon the will being admitted to probate.
If you plan to add a child in a will in New York, it's advisable to already name a guardian in the will so a separate petition for guardianship need not be filed. The court can approve the guardian once the will is admitted to probate. In this way, only one proceeding is required to be filed.
Should you need assistance in writing your will or filing for guardianship over a child to receive an inheritance, the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin are here for you. We are located in Midtown Manhattan, New York, NY. Call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected] to schedule a consultation.
New York treats minors – persons under the age of 18 – as lacking the legal capacity to hold and manage substantial property. A minor can hold small amounts of cash, personal items, and similar property informally. But for any meaningful inheritance, the law requires an adult to hold the property on the minor's behalf until the minor reaches majority. The mechanism is the guardian of the property, supervised by the Surrogate's Court under SCPA Article 17.
The $10,000 threshold is the dividing line. Below that amount, the assets can usually be received and held by the minor's parent or natural guardian without a court appointment. Above $10,000, a formal guardianship is required. The threshold is calculated per asset received and over the life of the minor, not per transaction. A child who inherits $5,000 from a grandmother and later receives a $7,000 life insurance benefit has crossed the line and will need a guardianship for both.
A parent has the right to nominate a guardian of the property in their will. SCPA § 1710 governs the nomination. The nomination is not absolutely binding on the court – the court still has to determine that the nominated guardian is suitable and that the appointment is in the child's best interests – but the parent's nomination is given substantial weight and is rarely overridden in the absence of disqualifying facts.
Naming the guardian in the will accomplishes several things. It saves the time and cost of a separate guardianship petition after the parent dies. It gives the family clarity about who will manage the inheritance. It allows the parent to choose the guardian carefully, weighing financial sophistication, relationship with the child, geographic proximity, and willingness to serve. And it lets the parent address contingencies – naming a successor in case the first choice cannot serve.
New York distinguishes between these two roles. The guardian of the person makes decisions about where the child lives, how the child is educated, what medical care the child receives, and the day-to-day matters of raising a child. The guardian of the property manages the child's money and other assets, files annual accountings with the court, and makes investment decisions.
The two roles can be held by the same person or by different people. Many parents name one person as guardian of the person – often a relative who is close to the child – and a different person as guardian of the property – often a relative or professional who has more financial experience. Splitting the roles is a feature, not a bug. It plays to people's strengths and creates a check-and-balance between caregiving and money management.
While naming a guardian in the will solves part of the problem, it is rarely the most elegant solution for a substantial inheritance. The guardian's authority ends when the child turns 18, at which point the child receives the remaining assets outright. For a 17-year-old, that means a brief guardianship and an outright distribution at 18 – often before the child is ready to manage money.
Parents who want their children to inherit at a later age, or in stages, use a trust instead. The will can leave the child's share to a trust that holds the assets until a defined age or set of ages. The trustee invests the assets, distributes income and principal for the child's benefit under standards in the trust, and ultimately distributes the principal when the child reaches the chosen age. Common structures include outright distribution at 25, distribution in thirds at 25/30/35, or distribution upon completion of education milestones.
A trust also provides more flexibility than a guardianship. The trustee can spend trust funds on the child's education, travel, medical expenses, or other needs without filing a petition for each disbursement. The trustee can invest in a wider range of assets than a guardian, who is generally restricted to conservative investments under court supervision.
If the child has a developmental or other disability that affects eligibility for SSI, Medicaid, or other government benefits, a direct inheritance can be disastrous. The inheritance counts as a resource for benefits purposes and can disqualify the child from programs they may rely on for life. The solution is a special needs trust – a specific kind of trust designed to supplement, not replace, government benefits.
A first-party special needs trust holds the child's own assets and provides for supplemental needs without affecting eligibility, but is subject to Medicaid payback at the child's death. A third-party special needs trust – funded with assets from someone other than the child, including a parent's bequest – avoids the payback requirement and is the right structure for a parent's planning. A parent who has a child with a disability should never leave assets to that child outright; the bequest should always go to a third-party special needs trust.
New York has adopted the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA), which allows assets to be held by a custodian for a minor without the formalities of a court-supervised guardianship. The custodian's authority terminates at the age set by the transferor – typically 18 or 21 in New York. UTMA accounts are commonly used for life insurance proceeds, retirement plan distributions, and outright gifts during the donor's lifetime.
A will can direct that any inheritance for a minor be held in a UTMA account rather than a guardianship. This simplifies the administration and avoids court supervision. But UTMA terminates at age 21 at the latest, which is still young for substantial sums. For larger inheritances, a trust remains the better choice.
Wills do not control assets that pass by beneficiary designation – retirement accounts, life insurance, transfer-on-death accounts, and similar instruments. If a minor is named as the direct beneficiary of an IRA or life insurance policy, the minor cannot receive the funds until a guardianship is established, regardless of what the will says. We routinely review beneficiary designations together with the will to make sure they all point to the same destination – usually a trust for the child's benefit – and that no asset slips into the minor's name directly.
Leaving an inheritance to a child requires more thought than simply listing the child's name in the will. The right structure – guardianship, UTMA, trust, special needs trust – depends on the size of the inheritance, the child's age, the family circumstances, and the parent's goals. We work with families to design plans that match those variables.