Skip to main content

Attorney to Defend Against Trustee Removal

Facing trustee removal in New York? Our experienced attorneys defend trustees against removal petitions. Protect your role and reputation. Call today.

Attorney Albert Goodwin
Albert Goodwin, Esq.

Serving as a trustee is a position of responsibility and trust. When beneficiaries, co-trustees or other interested parties petition to remove you, the stakes are high. Your fiduciary role is in jeopardy, and so are your reputation, your commissions and, if the petition comes bundled with surcharge claims, your own money. This page explains what a New York court actually requires before it removes a trustee, what beneficiaries typically allege, how a defense is built, and when a negotiated exit is the better outcome. Most trustees accept their appointment in good faith and work diligently at it; when disputes arise, they are usually fueled by family tension, misunderstanding or a beneficiary’s unrealistic expectations rather than by real misconduct.

What It Takes to Remove a Trustee in New York

Removal of a trustee is governed primarily by the Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act (SCPA) and the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL). The courts do not remove trustees lightly. New York courts have consistently held that the grantor’s selection of a trustee is entitled to considerable deference, and that removal is a drastic remedy that the court grants only on clearly established grounds of serious misconduct or incapacity.

Under SCPA § 711 and § 719 a trustee may be removed or suspended on specific statutory grounds: dishonesty, improvidence, want of understanding, substance abuse, conviction of a felony, failure to obey court orders, commingling of funds and other misconduct that demonstrates unfitness to continue serving. A petition must be supported by evidence establishing one or more of those grounds. We cover the statute on our SCPA 711 page and the proceeding generally on our trustee removal page.

Not every disagreement between a trustee and a beneficiary justifies removal. Hostility between the parties, by itself, is generally not enough. Minor errors of judgment, technical violations that caused the trust no harm, and disagreements over investment strategy typically will not support removal either. Those principles are the foundation of the defense for a trustee who has acted in good faith.

What Beneficiaries Usually Allege

Knowing the allegations that appear in most removal petitions lets a trustee anticipate and answer them.

AllegationWhat it usually involves
Breach of fiduciary dutyClaims that the trustee breached the duties of loyalty, care or impartiality: self-dealing, preferring some beneficiaries over others, or failing to diversify investments as the Prudent Investor Act, EPTL § 11-2.3, requires.
Failure to account or informA trustee must keep beneficiaries reasonably informed and provide accountings. Petitioners claim the trustee refused to disclose information, never accounted, or gave incomplete or misleading figures.
ComminglingMixing trust assets with personal funds is a serious allegation under New York law and can support removal even without proof of an actual loss to the trust.
Mismanagement or wastePoor investment decisions, excessive expenses, failure to collect debts owed to the trust, or letting trust property deteriorate.
Conflict of interestWhere the trustee is also a beneficiary, creditor or business partner of the trust, petitioners argue the overlapping interests compromise the trustee’s independence.
Hostility or inability to cooperateHostility alone is generally insufficient, but petitioners argue the relationship has deteriorated so badly that the trustee can no longer administer the trust effectively.

Why the Defense Cannot Be Improvised

A removal proceeding involves the Surrogate’s Court’s procedural rules, substantive trust law and evidentiary standards, and it very often travels with parallel claims for damages, surcharge or denial of commissions. A misstep at any stage can end not just in removal but in personal financial liability. We defend trustees in the Surrogate’s Courts of New York, Kings, Queens, Bronx, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester counties and in the Supreme Court, and where the petition rests on financial allegations we work with accountants and forensic experts to answer them with numbers rather than assertions.

How We Build the Defense

Every removal case turns on its own facts, but the work follows a consistent pattern.

  • Case assessment

    We begin with a thorough review of the trust instrument, the allegations in the petition, your actions as trustee and the financial records. That review identifies the strongest defenses and any vulnerabilities that need to be addressed before the other side finds them.

  • Procedural defenses

    We examine whether the petition was properly filed, whether the petitioner has standing, whether the allegations are specific enough, and whether the statute of limitations or laches bars any of the claims. Procedural defects can result in dismissal or a narrowing of the issues.

  • Substantive defenses

    On the merits, we develop the evidence that you complied with your fiduciary duties, acted within the authority the trust instrument granted, exercised reasonable business judgment and served the interests of all the beneficiaries. The grantor’s express choice of you as trustee is itself a point in your favor.

  • Affirmative defenses

    Where they apply, we raise beneficiary consent, waiver, ratification, exculpatory clauses in the trust instrument and the business judgment rule. New York trust instruments frequently contain provisions limiting a trustee’s liability for good-faith actions.

  • Counter-petitions and cross-claims

    In the right case we file a counter-petition to stop the petitioner from interfering with trust administration, to seek instructions from the court, or to assert claims against co-trustees or others who contributed to the dispute.

Protecting Your Commissions and Reputation

A removal petition often includes a request to deny or reduce the trustee’s commissions under SCPA § 2309 and related provisions. New York law lets a court deny commissions where a trustee has engaged in misconduct, but denial requires a finding of serious wrongdoing, not a mere technical violation. We defend the commissions you have earned for your service.

Public allegations of fiduciary misconduct can also damage a professional or personal reputation. Where appropriate we seek confidentiality protections and oppose unnecessary public disclosure of the allegations.

When Settlement Is the Right Choice

Not every case should go to trial. Sometimes a negotiated resolution, such as the appointment of a co-trustee, enhanced reporting to the beneficiaries, mediation of the specific dispute, or a resignation on favorable terms, serves the trustee better than prolonged litigation. A settlement can be structured to include releases from future liability and preservation of the commissions already earned.

When resignation is the best path, we work to see that you receive appropriate releases, that your final accounting is approved and that your commissions are paid. A voluntary resignation on favorable terms is far preferable to an involuntary removal that leaves you exposed to further liability.

Who We Represent

We defend individual family members serving as trustees of family trusts, professional trustees such as attorneys and accountants, corporate trustees and trust companies, co-trustees in disputes with other co-trustees, successor trustees who inherited problems from a predecessor, and trustees of revocable living trusts, testamentary trusts, irrevocable trusts, special needs trusts, charitable trusts and life insurance trusts.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • How long does a trustee removal proceeding take in New York?

    It depends on the complexity of the issues, the volume of discovery and the court’s calendar. Contested removal proceedings typically take anywhere from several months to two years or more. We work to resolve matters as efficiently as possible while making sure the defense is thorough.

  • Can the trust pay my legal fees to defend the removal action?

    Under New York law a trustee may be entitled to have legal fees paid from the trust for a good-faith defense of actions taken in administering the trust. That is fact-specific and subject to court approval, and if the trustee is ultimately found to have engaged in misconduct the court may order the fees reimbursed to the trust.

  • What happens if I am removed as trustee?

    The court appoints a successor trustee, and you must transfer the trust assets and records to the successor. You may also face claims for surcharge (personal liability for losses to the trust) and denial of commissions, which is why an effective defense matters.

  • Should I resign to avoid the removal proceeding?

    Not without legal advice. A poorly structured resignation can leave you exposed to continued liability. We can advise whether resignation is appropriate and, if so, how to structure it so that it protects you.

Speak With Us

If you have been served with a petition seeking your removal as trustee, or you expect one to be filed, early intervention can sometimes prevent litigation altogether and otherwise positions you for a strong defense. Call 212-233-1233 or email [email protected] and we will review the allegations against you and outline a plan.

Albert Goodwin gave interviews to and appeared on the following media outlets:

ProPublica Forbes ABC CNBC CBS NBC News Discovery Wall Street Journal NPR

Speak with our firm

Call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected] to discuss your matter.

Client Reviews

Verified feedback from our clients

Mr. Goodwin is everything you want in an attorney: professional, honest, thorough, and genuinely caring. He always explains things clearly, so I understood exactly what was happening and what to expect next. His attention to detail and persistence really stood out. Looking back, I feel lucky to have found him. He guided me through the whole process expertly, and I deeply appreciate all his hard work. Would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Sarah M

Legal Services

Thanks to Mr. Albert Goodwin's hard work and smart thinking, I finally won my case, which has been a long time coming. He figured out solutions that no one else could see. I'm really impressed by his strong ethics - something that's rare these days. As my lawyer, he went above and beyond what I expected. I'm so grateful I found him and would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Lawrence H

Legal Services

From our first meeting, I knew I was in great hands with Albert and his associate Katrina. They handled my case with incredible skill and efficiency, even though they took it over from another firm. What impressed me most was how quickly Albert responded to my questions with honest, clear answers - no sugarcoating, just straight talk. They managed a huge workload under tight deadlines, and their fees were very reasonable for such high-quality work. Beyond his legal expertise, Albert's wit and personality made a difficult process much easier to handle. I'm deeply grateful for their hard work and would absolutely choose them again. If you need legal help in New York, you won't find better representation than Albert's firm.

Adam F

Legal Services

VIEW MORE
New York State Bar Association Member Badge New York City Bar Association Member Badge American Bar Association Member Badge Avvo Rated Attorney Badge