Section 11-1.6 of the New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL) sets out one of the most basic rules governing executors, administrators, and trustees. Its core command is short: "Every fiduciary shall keep property received as fiduciary separate from his individual property." The rule applies whether the fiduciary is a family member serving as executor, a court-appointed administrator, or a professional trustee.
This page explains what the duty requires in practice, what happens when a fiduciary breaks it, and how interested parties raise the issue in Surrogate's Court.
Once a fiduciary receives letters testamentary, letters of administration, or takes office as trustee, the assets they control belong to the estate or trust. They are not the fiduciary's own money, even if the fiduciary is also a beneficiary. EPTL 11-1.6 requires the fiduciary to hold those assets in a way that keeps them identifiable and apart from personal funds.
In day-to-day terms, the duty means:
The duty works alongside the powers granted by statute. A fiduciary may have broad authority to sell, invest, and manage assets under EPTL 11-1.1, but those powers are exercised on the estate's behalf and through the estate's own accounts.
Commingling creates two problems. The first is tracing: once estate money is mixed with personal money, it becomes difficult to show which dollars belong to whom. The second is exposure: personal funds can be reached by the fiduciary's own creditors, so estate money sitting in a personal account is at risk of being lost to someone else's debts.
New York courts treat commingling as a breach of fiduciary duty even when no money is actually lost. Where records are confused because the fiduciary mixed funds, courts generally resolve doubts against the fiduciary, who bears the burden of proving that estate property was properly handled.
An executor sells the decedent's house and receives net proceeds of $480,000. Rather than opening an estate account, the executor deposits the check into a personal savings account that already holds $60,000 of the executor's own money. Over the next year, the executor withdraws $40,000 for a personal car purchase, intending to repay it.
Even if the executor later replaces the $40,000, the deposit itself violated EPTL 11-1.6. On an accounting, the court can surcharge the executor for any shortfall and add interest. Surrogate's Courts often apply the statutory rate of 9 percent per year under CPLR 5004 in surcharge cases, although the court has discretion to use a different rate. At 9 percent, interest on $40,000 runs to $3,600 for one year. The court can also reduce or deny the executor's commissions.
For questions about whether and how the sale itself was proper, see whether an administrator can sell estate property.
Executor commissions are set by SCPA 2307: 5 percent on the first $100,000, 4 percent on the next $200,000, 3 percent on the next $700,000, 2.5 percent on the next $4,000,000, and 2 percent above $5,000,000. On a $600,000 estate, statutory commissions would be $5,000 + $8,000 + $9,000 = $22,000. Where commingling is accompanied by misconduct or a failure to keep proper records, the court may deny all or part of that amount.
An administrator collects $2,500 a month in rent from a two-family house owned by the estate and deposits it into a joint account shared with a spouse. After 18 months, $45,000 in rent has passed through that account along with household income and expenses. The administrator cannot show which payments were estate expenses. On an accounting, the administrator may be charged with the full $45,000 unless they can document legitimate estate disbursements.
Beneficiaries, distributees, and other interested persons have several tools when they suspect commingling.
Claims against a fiduciary for breach of duty generally do not begin to run while the fiduciary is still acting, until the fiduciary openly repudiates the obligation or the account is judicially settled. That rule protects beneficiaries, but delay still carries a cost: records disappear, money is spent, and a fiduciary with no assets may be unable to pay a surcharge. Once a decree judicially settling an account is entered, interested parties who were properly served are generally bound by it, so objections must be raised in that proceeding.
Depending on the facts, a Surrogate's Court may:
Intentional taking of estate funds may also be referred for criminal prosecution. For a broader discussion of these claims, see our page on breach of fiduciary duty in New York.
Albert Goodwin represents beneficiaries, executors, administrators, and trustees in Surrogate's Court proceedings involving EPTL 11-1.6 and related fiduciary obligations.
For beneficiaries, we review bank records, demand information, and bring proceedings to compel an accounting, recover funds, or remove the fiduciary. For executors and trustees, we help correct account problems before they reach litigation, reconstruct records, and defend against surcharge and removal petitions.
You can contact the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin by phone at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].