An irrevocable trust in New York is not always permanent. Section 7-1.9 of the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL) allows the person who created a trust to revoke it, or amend all or part of it, if every person beneficially interested in the trust consents in writing. The consents must be acknowledged in the same manner as a deed. When those conditions are met, no court order is needed.
This page explains what the statute says, who must consent, how the process works in practice, and where it commonly goes wrong.
EPTL 7-1.9(a) provides that, upon the written consent of all the persons beneficially interested in a trust, "acknowledged or proved in the manner required by the laws of this state for the recording of a conveyance of real property," the creator of the trust may revoke or amend the whole or any part of it. The statute applies to trusts "heretofore or hereafter created," so it reaches older trusts as well as new ones.
EPTL 7-1.9(b) adds a limit on who counts as a beneficiary. A gift in the trust instrument to a class described only as the creator's "heirs, next of kin or distributees," or similar words, does not create a beneficial interest in those people. They do not need to consent.
The power belongs to the creator of the trust, often called the grantor or settlor. The beneficiaries cannot use EPTL 7-1.9 to change a trust on their own, and the trustee cannot either. The grantor must be living and must have the mental capacity to execute the amendment or revocation. For this reason, the statute does not help with a testamentary trust created under a will, because the creator has died.
"All the persons beneficially interested" means current income beneficiaries, discretionary beneficiaries, and remainder beneficiaries, including contingent remainder beneficiaries. If the trust leaves the remainder to the grantor's children, and to a deceased child's issue if a child dies first, the grandchildren hold contingent interests. Their consent is required too.
A beneficiary must be legally able to consent. Minors, incapacitated adults, and unborn or unascertained beneficiaries generally cannot give an effective consent, and New York courts have been reluctant to let a guardian or the court supply consent on their behalf for this purpose. When a trust names such beneficiaries, EPTL 7-1.9 is often unavailable, and other routes must be considered.
The statute does not require the trustee's consent unless the trustee is also a beneficiary. In practice, the trustee holds title to the assets and must carry out the change, so the trustee should receive the signed documents and confirm they are complete before acting.
In 2019, Margaret, then 70, transferred her house, worth $650,000, into an irrevocable trust. She keeps the right to live there. On her death, the house passes to her three adult children in equal shares. The trust bars any sale during her lifetime. Margaret now wants to sell and buy a smaller home.
Margaret signs an amendment allowing the trustee to sell the house and buy a replacement residence in the trust's name. Each of her three children signs a written consent before a notary, using an acknowledgment in recordable form. Once all four documents are complete and delivered to the trustee, the amendment is effective. For more on trusts holding a residence, see whether an irrevocable trust can buy a house.
Assume the same trust, except the remainder passes to the children "or, if a child is not then living, to that child's issue." One child has two daughters, ages 9 and 15. Those granddaughters hold contingent interests, and as minors they cannot consent. The amendment cannot be completed under EPTL 7-1.9 alone, even though all three children agree.
A trust pays income to the grantor for life, then $200,000 to a named nephew, with the balance to the grantor's "distributees." Under EPTL 7-1.9(b), the distributees have no beneficial interest for purposes of the statute. Only the nephew's acknowledged consent is needed, along with the consent of any other named beneficiary.
EPTL 7-1.9 is self-executing, so a court filing is not part of the ordinary process. Litigation arises when someone challenges the result. Common disputes include claims that a consent was obtained by fraud, duress, or undue influence, that the grantor lacked capacity, or that a necessary beneficiary was left out. The Surrogate's Court has jurisdiction over lifetime trusts under SCPA 207, and the Supreme Court also hears trust disputes. A trustee unsure whether a change is valid may seek instructions or a construction of the instrument rather than act on doubtful paperwork.
If EPTL 7-1.9 cannot be used, alternatives may include decanting into a new trust under EPTL 10-6.6, an exercise of trustee discretion to distribute principal under EPTL 7-1.6, or a petition for judicial reformation where the instrument contains a drafting error.
The statute sets no deadline for using it, but the grantor's death ends the power. If the grantor's health is declining, you need to act while capacity is clear and well documented. Consents should be signed close in time to the amendment. A consent signed years earlier, before a beneficiary's circumstances changed, invites challenge. Claims that a consent was procured by fraud are generally governed by CPLR 213(8): six years from the fraud or two years from when it was or could reasonably have been discovered, whichever is later.
Grantors who simply want to cut out one beneficiary should note that the affected beneficiary's own consent is required under EPTL 7-1.9. Other options are discussed on our page addressing whether you can remove a beneficiary from a trust.
Albert Goodwin represents grantors, beneficiaries, and trustees in trust amendment, revocation, and related disputes in New York.
For grantors and families, we review the trust, identify every beneficiary whose consent is required, and prepare amendments and acknowledged consents that will hold up. For beneficiaries and trustees who question whether a consent or amendment is valid, we evaluate capacity, undue influence, and procedural defects and pursue relief in the Surrogate's Court or Supreme Court.
You can contact the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin by phone at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].