By Albert Goodwin, Esq., Law Offices of Albert Goodwin. The firm has handled New York estate and guardianship matters since 2008.
This page explains the procedure for starting an adult guardianship in New York under Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law (MHL). It covers the steps from choosing the right statute and court to the reports a guardian files after appointment. It does not cover what a guardian does day to day or which type of guardian fits a family's situation. Those topics have their own pages, linked below.
New York has two main adult guardianship statutes, and they are filed in different courts.
The evidence each statute requires is different. A 17-A petition must be supported by certifications from two physicians, or one physician and one licensed psychologist, confirming the disability (SCPA 1750 and 1750-a). Article 81 has no such certification requirement to file. The petition must instead describe the person's functional limitations with specific facts, and the court decides capacity at a hearing on all the evidence.
The rest of this guide focuses on Article 81. For help deciding between the two, see what type of guardianship is right for my situation.
Article 81 requires the court to use the least restrictive form of intervention (MHL 81.02(a)(2)). Before appointing a guardian, the judge must consider whether other resources already meet the person's needs. Those resources include a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy, a trust, a representative payee or family support.
If the person signed a valid power of attorney or health care proxy while competent, and the agent is acting properly, a guardianship may be unnecessary or limited to narrow powers. If the agent is misusing the authority, a guardianship proceeding can be used to review and, where warranted, revoke it. See what to do when an agent abuses a power of attorney.
For warning signs that suggest it may be time to act, see is it time to start a guardianship?
MHL 81.06 lists who may bring an Article 81 petition. The list includes:
Many Article 81 petitions are filed by nursing homes or hospitals that need someone with authority to apply for Medicaid or approve a discharge plan. Family members can participate in those cases and ask to be named guardian.
An Article 81 case starts with a verified petition and a proposed order to show cause, not a summons. MHL 81.08 sets out what the petition must contain, including:
Vague allegations such as "Mom is confused" are weak. Judges want dated, concrete facts: unpaid bills, missed medications, a fall at home, a scam that drained an account, or a discharge that cannot happen without a guardian.
The papers are filed with the county clerk along with a Request for Judicial Intervention (RJI) so the case is assigned to a judge. When the judge signs the order to show cause, it sets the hearing date and usually appoints a court evaluator, and in some cases counsel for the AIP.
Service in an Article 81 case is strict, and errors can delay or defeat the case.
Affidavits of service and mailing must be filed before the hearing.
Several lawyers usually take part in an Article 81 case, often four or more if you count the judge. Each has a defined role.
If you have received papers and want to oppose a petition, see how to defend against a guardianship.
MHL 81.11 directs that the hearing be held no more than 28 days after the order to show cause is signed. Adjournments are common, especially when service is delayed or the case is contested.
If the court grants the petition, it must make written findings on the AIP's specific functional limitations and grant only the powers those limitations require (MHL 81.15). A guardian may be appointed for personal needs, property management or both. The statute directs the court to issue its decision within seven days after the hearing (MHL 81.13).
MHL 81.19 governs eligibility. An adult individual, a not-for-profit corporation, or a community guardian program may serve. Citizenship is not a listed requirement. In choosing a guardian, the court considers factors such as the AIP's wishes and any prior nomination, the proposed guardian's relationship with the AIP, the care and services the proposed guardian has provided, and any conflicts of interest. A health care or residential provider serving the AIP generally cannot be appointed, subject to narrow exceptions.
When relatives cannot agree, the court may appoint an independent guardian from the Part 36 list instead of a family member. That decision is discretionary. For more on eligibility and the different guardian roles, see the three types of guardians.
A guardian has no authority until the court issues a commission. To qualify, the guardian generally must:
Once these papers are filed, the clerk issues the commission (MHL 81.27). Banks, Medicaid offices, hospitals and landlords will ask for a certified copy of the commission before dealing with the guardian.
Appointment begins a period of court supervision.
For the guardian's ongoing duties, see the responsibilities of a guardian, what a guardian of the person does and what a guardian of the property does.
A full guardianship takes time. If there is immediate risk, the petitioner can ask the court to appoint a temporary guardian when the order to show cause is signed, or at any point before the final decision (MHL 81.23(a)). The court must find danger in the reasonably foreseeable future to the AIP's health and well-being, or danger of waste, misappropriation or loss of property.
Common reasons include an exploiting caregiver with access to accounts, a pending eviction, an imminent hospital discharge with no safe plan, or a deadline to file a Medicaid application. Temporary powers are limited to what the emergency requires. The court may also issue other provisional remedies, such as an order freezing accounts while the case proceeds. For signs of financial exploitation within a family, see preventing financial abuse of seniors.
Timing depends on the court calendar, service problems and whether anyone objects. The statutory deadlines are a starting point, not a guarantee.
In our practice, an uncontested Article 81 case with cooperative family members and organized records often moves from filing to commission in roughly two to four months. Contested cases can take considerably longer.
In an uncontested case, the AIP does not object or cannot meaningfully object, family members agree on the guardian, and the evaluator supports the petition. These cases often resolve at a single hearing, sometimes on consent to a limited set of powers.
A contested case usually involves one of three patterns. The AIP objects and has counsel arguing that they can manage with help. Relatives disagree about who should serve, often with accusations about past handling of money. Or a party argues that an existing power of attorney or health care proxy makes a guardian unnecessary. Contested cases tend to involve more hearing dates, medical testimony, financial records and, sometimes, a jury demand. They cost more and are less predictable.
The main expenses in an Article 81 case are:
When a guardian is appointed, these fees are usually paid from the incapacitated person's estate. If the petition is dismissed, the court may direct the petitioner to pay the evaluator's and counsel fees (MHL 81.09(f), 81.10(f)). Where the AIP has few assets, fees may be reduced or paid under other arrangements the court approves. Overall cost depends heavily on whether the case is contested and how complex the finances are, so we discuss expected costs with each client before filing.
Article 81 cases in Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens and Staten Island are heard in the Supreme Court in each borough. On Long Island and in Westchester, cases are heard in Supreme Court in Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester counties. Each county assigns guardianship cases to designated judges or parts and has its own guardianship staff and court examiners who review reports. Local requirements for proposed orders, scheduling and training differ, so check the county's current rules before filing. The New York State Unified Court System publishes guardianship forms and guidance on its website.
No physician certification is required to file under Article 81. Medical evidence still helps prove functional limitations at the hearing. A 17-A petition in Surrogate's Court does require physician or psychologist certifications.
The hearing must be held in the AIP's presence unless the court makes specific findings that excuse it. When the AIP cannot travel, the hearing is often held at the hospital, nursing home or home where the AIP lives.
Yes. Article 81 requires the court to grant only the powers needed to address the person's specific limitations. Many guardianships cover only property management, or only certain decisions.
Yes. The guardian, the incapacitated person or another interested party may move to modify or end the guardianship if the person regains capacity or circumstances change (MHL 81.36).
The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin has represented petitioners, family members and people facing guardianship petitions since 2008. We handle cases in Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens, Staten Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County and Westchester County. We can review whether Article 81 or 17-A applies, whether a less restrictive option will work, and what your case is likely to involve. Call 212-233-1233 or email [email protected].
This page provides general information about New York guardianship procedure and is not legal advice. Statutory requirements and local court rules change. Confirm current law before acting on any deadline.