Forced Sale of Inherited Property in New York City

Forcing the sale of inherited property among heirs is common. Real Property Actions & Proceedings Law (RPAPL) § 901 allows a joint owner or tenant-in-common to force the sale of co-owned property. Heirs who inherit property together are tenants-in-common, and one heir can force the sale of inherited property by filing an action for partition under RPAPL § 901.

Partition usually happens when one or more heirs live on the inherited property, rent-free, while the other heirs derive no benefit from the inherited property.

Different treatment of inherited property in New York

In New York, the forced sale of inherited property goes through a different process than ordinary partition to protect the heirs who have inherited property. Previously, prior to the enactment of the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (UPHPA) in 2019, unscrupulous real estate investors would purchase the share of an unhappy heir who does not want to go through the process of filing an action for partition. After purchasing the share of the heir, the real estate investor would then file the action for partition.

An action for partition under RPAPL § 901 would ultimately end with the property being sold in a public auction, with the real estate investor as the winning bidder. A sale in a public auction would usually yield a price below market value than a sale through a broker in the open market.

Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (UPHPA)

UPHPA allows the co-heirs to get the maximum value out of inherited property. In order to enjoy the benefits of UPHPA, the first step requires the classification of the property as “heirs property.” Once the court classifies the inherited property as heirs property, the other co-owners are given the opportunity to buy-out the share of the other co-owners who filed an action for partition.

When is inherited property classified as heirs property?

Inherited property is considered as heirs property when the property is owned under tenancy-in-common at the time an action for partition was filed, and which has all of the following characteristics:

  1. No written agreement governs the partition of the property;
  2. At least one tenant-in-common acquired title from a relative; and
  3. Any of the following applies:
    1. 20% or more of the interests are held by co-tenants who are relatives;
    2. 20% or more of the interests are held by an individual who acquired title from a relative;
    3. 20% or more of the co-tenants are relatives of each other; or
    4. any co-tenant who acquired title from a relative resides in the property.

Mandatory settlement conference

After property is designated as heirs property and before a forced sale of inherited property can continue, the heirs who are tenants-in-common must attend a mandatory settlement conference to negotiate in good faith on a mutually agreeable solution. If even one of the plaintiffs refuses to negotiate in good faith, the partition action may be dismissed.

Buy-out procedure

Once property is classified as heirs property, the property is appraised in order to obtain its market value. The appraisal will provide the lowest price the property can be purchased, and it also provides a reference point for which an heir can buy the interests of the other heirs who filed an action for partition to enforce the sale of the inherited property.

Open market sale

If the buy-out procedure fails and none of the co-heirs purchase the interests of the unhappy co-owner/s, the property is sold in the open market and not through public auction. Selling the property in the open market on a private sale will yield a higher price than selling it through public auction. This protects the heirs from unscrupulous real estate investors who seek to sell the property through public auction and get the property at a lower price than market value.

Options before filing a lawsuit for partition

Before forcing the sale of inherited property through court action, try to see if you can negotiate with the other co-owners on other possible options so that you don’t need to litigate and you can save on legal expenses. Litigating will eat up the owner’s equity in the inherited property because the proceeds of the sale of the inherited property will be used to pay for legal expenses before distributing it to the co-heirs. Attorney’s fees may be recovered once proven that the other co-owners were obstructive in efforts to enter into an amicable resolution to dispose of your share of the inherited property. Schorner v. Schorner, 128 Misc.2d 415 (1985).

  • Negotiate a buy-out with your other co-owners

    • Talk to your other co-owners and see if they are willing to buy out your share. This will entail an appraisal of the property in order to compute your respective share.
  • Sell your property share to a non-owner

    • You can also sell your interest to a third party. However, this option is rarely utilized because no one wants to co-own property with a stranger.
    • Previously, real estate investors would buy the share of a co-owner/co-heir and then file an action for partition. This would allow the real estate investor to buy the house in an auction at a price below market value. However, with the enactment of the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act in New York, this practice has been minimized.
  • Send a demand letter through your lawyer to compel negotiation

    • If your other co-owners do not take your issue seriously, you can contact a lawyer to send a demand letter to the co-owners, requesting for the sale of the property. Although you can send the demand letter yourself, having a demand letter sent by an attorney shows that you are serious in your endeavor to sell the co-owned property. In most instances, co-owners would already take your issue seriously because going to court will entail expenses and rarely will a court deny an action for partition filed by a co-owner.

Forcing the sale of inherited property through an action for partition may entail some initial expense, but sometimes, it can be inevitable, especially when the co-heirs cannot agree amongst themselves. If you are a co-heir who wants to force the sale of inherited property, consult with a partition lawyer immediately. Usually, a demand letter can already initiate negotiations. At the most, a partition action will compel the parties to really sit down and negotiate an amicable resolution to the dispute. If you need assistance, we at the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin are here for you. We have offices in New York City, Brooklyn, NY and Queens, NY. You can call us at 212-233-1233 or send us an email at [email protected].

Key Deadlines and Procedural Details Under RPAPL § 993

The Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act is codified at RPAPL § 993, within Article 9 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law. It does not replace ordinary partition under RPAPL Article 9 — it overlays additional mandatory protections. The first thing a court does in a partition case involving inherited property is determine whether the property qualifies as heirs property under RPAPL § 993(2); if it does, the § 993 sequence must be followed before any sale can be ordered.

Court-appointed appraisal and objections

Under RPAPL § 993(6), unless the co-tenants have agreed in writing on the property's value or on another valuation method, the court determines fair market value by ordering an independent, court-appointed appraisal. The court then sends notice of the appraised value to the parties, who may file objections. If value is disputed, the court holds an evidentiary hearing before finalizing the fair market value that will govern the buy-out.

The 45-day buy-out election

Under RPAPL § 993(7), when a co-tenant has requested partition by sale, the non-requesting co-tenants receive the option to purchase that co-tenant's interest at a price equal to the appraised value multiplied by the selling co-tenant's fractional share. Key mechanics include:

  • Each co-tenant must elect to buy within 45 days of the court's notice of the buy-out right.
  • If more than one co-tenant elects to buy, the purchase is apportioned among them according to their relative ownership interests.
  • The electing co-tenant must then pay the purchase price into court within a further statutory period of approximately 60 days.

Partition in kind before partition by sale

If no buy-out is completed, the court proceeds under RPAPL § 993(8)–(9) and first considers whether the property can be fairly divided physically among the co-owners (partition in kind). For a single-family home, physical division is rarely feasible, so the court typically orders a sale. Under RPAPL § 993(10), that sale must be conducted as an open-market sale through a licensed real estate broker at the court-determined value, unless the court finds an open-market sale would not produce a fair price, in which case it may order a sale by sealed bids or auction.

Which Court Hears a Forced Sale of Inherited Property?

Partition is a real-property action that must be brought in the Supreme Court of the county where the property is located — not in the Surrogate's Court. The Surrogate's Court administers the decedent's estate: proving the will, appointing an executor or administrator, and distributing assets. Once title to the real property has vested in the heirs as tenants in common, disputes over forcing a sale of that property belong in Supreme Court under RPAPL Article 9.

Heirs who take property from a parent — whether under a will or through New York's intestacy statute, EPTL § 4-1.1 — each hold an undivided fractional interest in the whole property. There is no "my half of the house": every tenant in common has the right to possess and use the entire property and to receive a proportionate share of any income it produces. Because no co-owner can be forced to remain in a tenancy in common indefinitely, any co-heir may demand partition, and a single co-owner generally cannot block a sale forever.

For the statutory rules in depth, see our RPAPL 993 heirs property guide.

Detailed guides to partition procedure, defenses and buyouts are on our real estate site: partition of property at Goodwin Real Estate Law.

Attorney Albert Goodwin

About the Author

Albert Goodwin Esq. is a licensed New York attorney with over 18 years of courtroom experience. His extensive knowledge and expertise make him well-qualified to write authoritative articles on a wide range of legal topics. He can be reached at 212-233-1233 or [email protected].

Albert Goodwin gave interviews to and appeared on the following media outlets:

ProPublica Forbes ABC CNBC CBS NBC News Discovery Wall Street Journal NPR

Client Reviews

Verified feedback from our clients

Mr. Goodwin is everything you want in an attorney: professional, honest, thorough, and genuinely caring. He always explains things clearly, so I understood exactly what was happening and what to expect next. His attention to detail and persistence really stood out. Looking back, I feel lucky to have found him. He guided me through the whole process expertly, and I deeply appreciate all his hard work. Would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Sarah M

Legal Services

Thanks to Mr. Albert Goodwin's hard work and smart thinking, I finally won my case, which has been a long time coming. He figured out solutions that no one else could see. I'm really impressed by his strong ethics - something that's rare these days. As my lawyer, he went above and beyond what I expected. I'm so grateful I found him and would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Lawrence H

Legal Services

From our first meeting, I knew I was in great hands with Albert and his associate Katrina. They handled my case with incredible skill and efficiency, even though they took it over from another firm. What impressed me most was how quickly Albert responded to my questions with honest, clear answers - no sugarcoating, just straight talk. They managed a huge workload under tight deadlines, and their fees were very reasonable for such high-quality work. Beyond his legal expertise, Albert's wit and personality made a difficult process much easier to handle. I'm deeply grateful for their hard work and would absolutely choose them again. If you need legal help in New York, you won't find better representation than Albert's firm.

Adam F

Legal Services

VIEW MORE
New York State Bar Association Member Badge New York City Bar Association Member Badge American Bar Association Member Badge Avvo Rated Attorney Badge