Here are some questions to ask at a kinship hearing on a direct (or cross) examination of a distributee who is a witness.
In this case, the decedent is an aunt. Can’t ask about the aunt directly because of dead man’s statute. Have to ask witness about their own relationship. Start with nearest common ancestor.
Name your grandparents on your mother’s side (or father’s side, depending on the relationship of the witness to the decedent)
name their children
(whichever child died, ask if they had children. If yes ask their names. Ask if they’re still alive).
(whoever died, ask if they died before the decedent)
For everyone who died before the decedent, ask if they have children
Ask for date of death for everyone who died.
For everyone, ask if they were married, if they had any other marriage, if they had children outside the marriage, if they had any adopted children, what was your relationship with them, where you close, have you meet everyone, do you know them personally.
Did you have family gatherings? Did the decedent bring anyone with them? Did the decedent come regularly? Did you have weddings? Did the decedent bring anyone?
if someone died after the decedent (rare), find their heirs
Have you been to the decedent’s home? How many times? Describe the apartment or house. Was anyone else living in the apartment or house?
Cross:
How do you know the grandparents had X children?
A kinship hearing is the testimonial phase of a kinship proceeding. The petitioner has filed the petition, gathered documentary evidence, and (in most cases) had the genealogical record reviewed by a court-appointed guardian ad litem. The hearing is the opportunity to put live witnesses on the record to confirm, expand, and support the documentary evidence. The Surrogate uses the combined record to decide who the distributees of the estate actually are, and in what proportions they share.
Kinship hearings are usually conducted by the court attorney-referee or by the Surrogate directly. They follow the same general rules of evidence as a trial in Supreme Court, with adaptations for the more informal nature of probate practice. The witness is sworn, examined by the petitioner's counsel, cross-examined by any opposing counsel (including the guardian ad litem), and asked follow-up questions by the court.
New York's Dead Man's Statute (CPLR § 4519) generally prevents an interested party from testifying about transactions or communications with a deceased person. The statute is intended to prevent fraud – it stops a party with a financial interest from inventing self-serving conversations with someone who is no longer able to dispute the account.
In kinship cases, the witness is often a distributee who would inherit if the petition succeeds. The witness is therefore an interested party. The statute blocks the witness from testifying directly about conversations with the decedent. But the witness can testify about their own knowledge of family relationships – who their grandparents were, who their grandparents' children were, when those children died, who their children were. This is why the question structure in the guide above starts with the witness's own family rather than asking about the decedent.
Carefully drawn questions can develop the genealogical chain without ever crossing the dead-man's-statute line. Opposing counsel and the guardian ad litem will object if the line is crossed, and the testimony will be stricken. Sustaining a steady flow of testimony that stays on the right side of the statute requires preparation.
The petitioner's direct examination has a defined goal: build a complete genealogical record on the testimony in a way that ties to the documents already admitted. The standard structure is to start with the witness's own background, move to the witness's grandparents (or great-grandparents in a cousin case), enumerate each generation, identify all children of each ancestor, ask about the marriages of each, ask about children born in and outside of marriage, ask about adoptions, and confirm the dates of death.
For each person identified, the questioning should establish:
The "how do you know" foundation is critical. A bare recitation of family relationships is much weaker than testimony grounded in personal knowledge – attendance at family gatherings, conversations with parents and grandparents, presence at weddings and funerals, possession of family documents.
The witness should be prepared to describe the family network in concrete terms. Holidays celebrated together, weddings attended, funerals attended, family reunions, photographs reviewed, family bibles examined, and personal correspondence are all building blocks of personal knowledge.
Some specific questions that help establish this foundation:
The cumulative picture matters more than any single answer. A witness who can describe the family in concrete detail across decades is a credible witness on the genealogy.
The guardian ad litem represents the interests of any unknown heirs. The GAL's job on cross is to probe whether the testimony actually proves what the petitioner is claiming – particularly the "no others" requirement. Common cross topics include:
The GAL's cross is generally not hostile – the GAL is trying to satisfy the court that the petitioner has done the necessary work. Where the cross does turn skeptical, it usually reflects a real gap in the proof that the petitioner needs to address with additional evidence.
The strongest kinship presentation pairs testimony with documents. As the witness identifies each family member and event, the corresponding documents are offered into evidence – birth certificates for births, marriage certificates for marriages, death certificates for deaths, census records for household composition, obituaries for relationships, photographs for connections. The result is a record where each link in the chain is supported by both testimony and documentary proof.
When documents are missing, the witness's testimony is the substitute. The court will accept testimonial proof for a link in the chain when no document is available, but the testimony has to be specific, internally consistent, and supported by surrounding facts.
Some of the most common mistakes we see in kinship presentations:
If you are preparing for a kinship hearing or have been served with a citation in a kinship proceeding, contact the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected]. We prepare witnesses, build documentary records, and conduct hearings in kinship cases throughout New York.