When New York City Medicaid denies your application or terminates your existing coverage, you have the right to fight that decision. The first step is to file a request for a fair hearing — an administrative trial conducted by the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTDA). It is called a “fair hearing” because both the federal Due Process Clause and New York’s own regulations (Social Services Law § 22 and 18 NYCRR Part 358) require a hearing before government benefits can be cut off. Despite the friendly name, this is a contested legal proceeding, and the agency will be represented. You should be too.
Being polite to the hearing officer (an Administrative Law Judge) will not, by itself, change the outcome. To win, you need to present financial documentation, apply the correct eligibility rules, and cite prior fair hearing decisions that support your position. Equally important, you need to build a clean record. If the hearing decision goes against you, the only way to challenge it in court is through an Article 78 proceeding under CPLR Article 78 — and the Supreme Court can only review evidence that was already placed before the hearing officer.
The strategy depends on which type of New York Medicaid was denied. Most disputes in NYC involve one of these programs:
In New York City, applications are handled by the Human Resources Administration (HRA) Medicaid program rather than a county Department of Social Services. The fair hearing system, however, is the same statewide.
Most denials fall into a handful of categories. Identifying the reason on your Notice of Decision is the starting point for the challenge.
Under 18 NYCRR § 358-3.5, you generally have 60 days from the date of the Notice of Decision to request a fair hearing. If your existing Medicaid is being terminated or reduced (rather than denied for the first time) and you want coverage to continue while the hearing is pending, you must request the hearing within 10 days of the notice and check the “aid continuing” box. This is known as aid continuing, and it keeps your benefits in place until a decision is issued.
Missing the 60-day deadline usually means starting over with a new application. You can request a late hearing and ask for good-cause acceptance, but the standard is strict and rarely granted. Always calculate the deadline from the date printed on the notice, not the date you received it.
You can request a hearing through OTDA in several ways:
The request must identify the agency that took the action (HRA Medicaid), the case or client identification number, the date of the notice, and the specific action you are appealing. State that you want aid continuing if it applies. After filing, OTDA schedules the hearing and mails a Notice of Hearing. Most Medicaid hearings in NYC are now held by telephone or video; the notice explains how to participate.
While every case is different, a typical excess-resources denial often moves like this:
Preparation is the single biggest predictor of success. Start by requesting the agency’s case file. Under 18 NYCRR § 358-3.7, the agency must provide the documents it relied on to make the decision and other relevant material in your file. Review it to understand exactly what the agency considered and what it overlooked.
Then assemble your evidence. The documents that win each category of denial usually include:
Organize everything into a tabbed exhibit binder with a cover index, and submit it to the hearing officer in advance. A clean, indexed presentation shows the ALJ you are serious and makes the record easy to review on appeal.
The hearing officer is an Administrative Law Judge who hears Medicaid and other public-benefits cases. The agency is represented by a fair-hearing representative — not always an attorney, but someone trained to defend the agency’s position. Each side may introduce documents, call witnesses, and cross-examine the other side’s witnesses. The hearing is recorded, and that record — not the hearing itself — is what a court reviews later.
The ALJ typically reserves decision and issues a written ruling. If you win, the decision directs the agency to take corrective action: approving the application, restoring benefits, or recalculating eligibility. New York fair hearing decisions are publicly searchable in OTDA’s online decision database, and citing on-point prior decisions can be persuasive when the facts mirror yours.
If you lose the fair hearing, the next step is an Article 78 proceeding in New York State Supreme Court. The court does not retry the facts. Its job is to decide whether the agency’s determination was supported by substantial evidence in the record and whether the agency followed the law. That is why building a complete record at the fair hearing is so important — if your evidence is not already in the administrative record, the Supreme Court generally will not consider it.
An Article 78 petition must be filed within four months of the final administrative decision (CPLR 217). Most cases are decided on submitted papers. If you prevail, the court typically remands the matter to the agency for corrective action consistent with its ruling. If you lose, your remaining option is an appeal to the Appellate Division.
Medicaid is a complex, document-intensive program, and the agency’s internal practices are often opaque. Many people who try to handle a denial alone arrive at the hearing without the right documents, without supporting fair hearing decisions, and without a clear legal theory connecting the program rules to their facts. Because the Supreme Court can only review the record built at the hearing, gaps left at that stage are usually permanent.
An attorney can identify the legal theory that best fits your case, request the agency file, gather the supporting evidence, file the proper requests on time, and present the case in a way that creates the record needed for a successful appeal if necessary. The cost of representation is often a small fraction of what is at stake — a denied institutional Medicaid application can mean tens of thousands of dollars per month in private-pay nursing home costs.
Generally 60 days from the date on the Notice of Decision. If your active Medicaid is being terminated and you want aid continuing, you must request the hearing within 10 days.
Yes, if your existing coverage is being terminated or reduced and you request the hearing within 10 days while electing aid continuing. This is not available for a first-time denial.
You can request a late hearing and argue good cause, but it is rarely granted. In most cases you will need to file a new Medicaid application.
You may challenge the decision through an Article 78 proceeding in New York Supreme Court, filed within four months of the final decision.
It is not legally required, but because the hearing record is what controls any later court appeal, experienced representation often makes the difference between approval and a costly denial.
If you have received a notice denying or terminating your Medicaid in New York City, time is short. Contact us promptly so we can review the notice, calendar the deadlines, request the case file, and develop a strategy. We handle fair hearings, Article 78 proceedings, and appellate review of Medicaid decisions throughout New York. You can reach the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].
Albert Goodwin, Esq. is the founder of the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin, with offices serving New York City and Long Island. He is admitted to practice law in New York State and concentrates his practice on estate, trust, and elder-law matters, including Medicaid eligibility disputes, fair hearings, and Article 78 proceedings. He has more than a decade of experience representing clients in Surrogate’s Court and administrative proceedings throughout New York. Learn more on our about Albert Goodwin page.
This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Medicaid rules and dollar limits change periodically; verify current figures and deadlines with OTDA or an attorney before acting. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Last updated: June 2024.