My Mother Left Me Nothing in Her Will — Can I Contest It in New York?

Reviewed by Albert Goodwin, Esq., a New York estate litigation attorney admitted in New York. Last reviewed: June 2024. This article is general information, not legal advice for your specific situation.

Finding out that your mother left you nothing in her will is painful — sometimes more so than the loss itself. Many people in this situation start with one question: "Can I do something about it?" Before spending money and emotional energy on a will contest, you need to understand a hard truth about New York law, and then the narrow circumstances in which a contest is actually viable.

The Hard Truth: In New York, a Parent Can Legally Disinherit an Adult Child

New York does not have forced heirship. Unlike Louisiana and many foreign jurisdictions, New York gives an adult child no legal right to inherit anything from a parent. A competent person may leave her property to anyone she chooses — a sibling, a friend, a charity, a caregiver, or a single child to the exclusion of all the others. "I think she was being unfair" is not a legal ground to set a will aside.

This matters because it reframes the real question. The issue is almost never "Was disinheriting me unfair?" The issue is "Was this document actually her freely-made, validly-executed will?" A will contest does not ask the court to rewrite your mother's wishes. It asks the court to decide whether the paper offered for probate truly reflects them.

Two important points that surprise many disinherited children:

  • The elective share does not help you. New York's elective share (EPTL 5-1.1-A) protects a surviving spouse — entitling them to roughly the greater of $50,000 or one-third of the net estate. It does not apply to children. There is no equivalent statutory floor for a child.
  • Intentional disinheritance is valid. If your mother knew she had you and chose to leave you out — even without saying why — that omission is fully enforceable in New York. A testator is not required to explain or justify excluding a child.

The Narrow Exception: Pretermitted (Accidentally Omitted) Children

There is one statutory protection for omitted children, but it is far narrower than most people hope. Under EPTL 5-3.2, an "after-born" child — a child born or adopted after the will was executed and not provided for or mentioned in it — may be entitled to a share as if the parent had died partially intestate.

The key limitation: EPTL 5-3.2 protects only children born or adopted after the will was signed. If you were already alive when your mother made the will and she simply left you out, you are not a pretermitted child and the statute gives you nothing — even if you are not mentioned at all. New York law treats your existing exclusion as intentional.

So When Is a Contest Actually Worth It?

A contest becomes viable only when there is real evidence that the will is not a valid expression of your mother's intent. The recognized grounds for objecting to probate in New York are:

  • Lack of testamentary capacity (EPTL 3-1.1): Did your mother understand, at the moment of signing, the nature of making a will, the general extent of her property, and who her natural heirs were? Dementia, severe medication, or hospitalization around the signing can raise this.
  • Undue influence: Did someone — often the person who inherited everything — exert pressure that overpowered her free will? This is the most common ground when one child or a caregiver suddenly receives everything.
  • Fraud: Was your mother deceived into signing, or lied to about what the document was or what it said?
  • Improper execution (EPTL 3-2.1): Were the strict formalities followed — signature at the end, two attesting witnesses, the testator declaring the document to be her will?
  • Duress or forgery: Was she physically forced, or is the signature not hers?

A genuine disagreement with her decision is not enough. There must be a credible, evidence-based ground from this list.

Red Flags That Strengthen a Disinherited Child's Case

Based on patterns we see in New York estate litigation, a contest is more promising where several of these are present:

  • A sudden, late-life change to the will — especially one made when your mother was ill, isolated, or declining — that benefits one person.
  • The chief beneficiary was in a confidential relationship with your mother (her attorney, accountant, caregiver, or a child who controlled her finances and arranged the new will). Where a confidential relationship and suspicious circumstances combine, the burden can shift to the beneficiary to explain the gift.
  • The will was not drafted or supervised by an attorney. Attorney supervision creates a presumption of due execution and capacity that is harder to overcome; a homemade or notary-shop will is far more vulnerable.
  • The disinherited child was previously close to the parent or named in an earlier will, and the change is unexplained.
  • Medical or pharmacy records show cognitive decline, strong sedation, or psychiatric issues near the signing date.

The No-Contest (In Terrorem) Clause — and Its Safe Harbor

Many wills contain an in terrorem clause, which says that any beneficiary who challenges the will forfeits whatever they were left. But if your mother left you nothing, you may have little or nothing to lose — the clause cannot take away a share you never had.

Just as importantly, New York provides a safe harbor. Under SCPA 1404 and EPTL 3-3.5, certain preliminary steps — including examining the attorney-drafter and the attesting witnesses and reviewing the file — do not trigger forfeiture. This lets you investigate the strength of a case before deciding whether to file formal objections.

Investigating Before You Commit: The SCPA 1404 Examination

Before formally objecting, New York lets you investigate through an SCPA 1404 examination. You may depose the attesting witnesses, the attorney who drafted the will, and the nominated executor, and obtain documents such as medical records, pharmacy records, the drafting attorney's file and notes, and gift and estate tax records. The cost of these depositions is generally borne by the estate.

This discovery is governed by the 3/2 rule: you may obtain documents and ask about events from three years before the will was executed up to two years after execution — or to your mother's date of death, whichever is earlier. The 1404 stage is where many disinherited children learn whether they have a real case or whether the will was, in fact, valid.

The Deadline — Do Not Wait

Will contests are time-sensitive. Once the will is offered for probate, the Surrogate's Court issues a citation, and you typically must appear and file objections by the return date stated on the citation (often only a few weeks out). After preliminary 1404 examinations, the court sets a deadline for filing formal objections. Missing these dates can permanently cost you the right to challenge the will. If you have received a citation or learned that your mother's will is being probated, contact a lawyer immediately rather than waiting.

An Illustrative Scenario

Consider a common (composite, illustrative) fact pattern: A mother in Queens lived independently for decades and had an old will dividing everything equally among her three children. In her final eighteen months she developed dementia and moved in with one daughter, who managed her bank accounts and medical appointments. Two months before she died, a brand-new will appeared — drafted by an attorney that daughter selected — leaving the entire estate to that daughter and nothing to the other two children. Here, the late change, the confidential relationship and control by the inheriting child, the cognitive decline, and the new attorney are classic undue-influence indicators worth investigating under SCPA 1404. This is for illustration only; every case turns on its own facts and evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my mother legally leave me nothing in New York?

Yes. New York has no forced heirship for children. A competent adult may disinherit a child entirely, with or without explanation.

What if I'm not named in the will at all?

If you were alive when the will was made, being unnamed is treated as intentional and gives you no automatic right. Only a child born or adopted after the will was signed may have rights as a pretermitted heir under EPTL 5-3.2.

What is the deadline to contest?

You generally must respond by the return date on the probate citation and file objections by the deadline the court sets after preliminary examinations. These can be short, so act promptly.

How much does it cost?

Costs vary with complexity and whether the matter settles. The SCPA 1404 depositions are typically paid by the estate, but you bear your own attorney's fees unless the will is ultimately denied probate. A consultation can help you weigh likely cost against the size of the estate and the strength of the evidence.

Will I lose my inheritance by challenging a no-contest clause?

If you were left nothing, an in terrorem clause usually has nothing to take from you. And the SCPA 1404 safe harbor lets you investigate without triggering forfeiture.

Related Pages

Talk to a New York Estate Litigation Attorney

If your mother left you nothing and you suspect the will does not reflect what she truly wanted — or you simply need a clear answer on whether a contest is possible — the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin can review your situation. We handle estate litigation in New York City, Brooklyn, and Queens. Call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected]. Because objection deadlines can be short, do not wait to seek advice.

Attorney Albert Goodwin

About the Author

Albert Goodwin Esq. is a licensed New York attorney with over 18 years of courtroom experience. His extensive knowledge and expertise make him well-qualified to write authoritative articles on a wide range of legal topics. He can be reached at 212-233-1233 or [email protected].

Albert Goodwin gave interviews to and appeared on the following media outlets:

ProPublica Forbes ABC CNBC CBS NBC News Discovery Wall Street Journal NPR

Client Reviews

Verified feedback from our clients

Mr. Goodwin is everything you want in an attorney: professional, honest, thorough, and genuinely caring. He always explains things clearly, so I understood exactly what was happening and what to expect next. His attention to detail and persistence really stood out. Looking back, I feel lucky to have found him. He guided me through the whole process expertly, and I deeply appreciate all his hard work. Would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Sarah M

Legal Services

Thanks to Mr. Albert Goodwin's hard work and smart thinking, I finally won my case, which has been a long time coming. He figured out solutions that no one else could see. I'm really impressed by his strong ethics - something that's rare these days. As my lawyer, he went above and beyond what I expected. I'm so grateful I found him and would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Lawrence H

Legal Services

From our first meeting, I knew I was in great hands with Albert and his associate Katrina. They handled my case with incredible skill and efficiency, even though they took it over from another firm. What impressed me most was how quickly Albert responded to my questions with honest, clear answers - no sugarcoating, just straight talk. They managed a huge workload under tight deadlines, and their fees were very reasonable for such high-quality work. Beyond his legal expertise, Albert's wit and personality made a difficult process much easier to handle. I'm deeply grateful for their hard work and would absolutely choose them again. If you need legal help in New York, you won't find better representation than Albert's firm.

Adam F

Legal Services

VIEW MORE
New York State Bar Association Member Badge New York City Bar Association Member Badge American Bar Association Member Badge Avvo Rated Attorney Badge