Skip to main content

Attorney for Contesting a TOD

Experienced New York City attorneys for contesting TOD designations. Challenge transfer on death accounts, deeds & beneficiary disputes. Free consultation.

Attorney Albert Goodwin
Albert Goodwin, Esq.

When a relative dies, the discovery of a Transfer on Death (TOD) designation can change everything the family expected about the inheritance. If you believe a TOD account, security or registration was created under suspicious circumstances, forged, or obtained through undue influence, New York law gives you a way to challenge it. We represent heirs, will beneficiaries, executors and named TOD beneficiaries in these disputes in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx and Staten Island.

Contesting a TOD calls for a working knowledge of New York estate law, contract principles and the statutes that govern transfer on death designations. Valid claims are regularly lost to procedural missteps and missed deadlines, so the sooner the question is looked at, the better.

Understanding Transfer on Death Designations in New York

A Transfer on Death designation is a non-probate mechanism: the asset passes directly to the named beneficiary at the owner’s death, bypassing the estate. In New York the designation is most often seen on securities and brokerage accounts, which are governed by the Uniform Transfer-on-Death Security Registration Act codified in EPTL Article 13, Part 4; on bank accounts with a payable-on-death (POD) designation; on retirement accounts such as IRAs and 401(k)s; on life insurance policies with named beneficiaries; and on U.S. Savings Bonds registered with a co-owner or beneficiary.

New York has recognized transfer on death deeds for real property only since July 19, 2024, under Real Property Law § 424. A TOD deed signed before that date, or one that does not meet the statute’s formalities (two witnesses and a notary, and recording before the owner’s death), is ineffective, which is itself a basis for challenge when such a document turns up.

Grounds for Contesting a TOD in New York

New York law provides several theories for setting aside a TOD designation. Each needs its own evidence, and the facts surrounding the designation usually point to the strongest one. The same grounds are used to contest a transfer on death account of any kind.

  • Lack of Capacity

    The owner must have had sufficient mental capacity when the TOD designation was created or changed. If the owner suffered from dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, severe illness, heavy medication or another condition that impaired the ability to understand what was being signed, the designation can be invalidated. Medical records, witness testimony and expert evaluations carry these cases.

  • Undue Influence

    Undue influence is present when someone in a position of trust or power manipulates the owner into making or changing a designation against the owner’s true wishes. New York courts look at whether there was a confidential relationship between the beneficiary and the decedent, whether the decedent was physically or mentally weak, whether the decedent was isolated from family and friends, whether the change was an unusual departure from a long-standing estate plan, whether the beneficiary was actively involved in procuring the designation, and whether the natural objects of the decedent’s bounty were cut out.

  • Fraud and Forgery

    If the designation form was forged, or the owner was deceived about the nature or contents of the document, the designation can be set aside. Handwriting analysis, forensic document examination and the financial institution’s own records are usually central.

  • Duress

    When threats, coercion or other pressure compel an owner to make a designation, it may be invalidated for duress. Duress differs from undue influence in that the compulsion is overt.

  • Mistake or Improper Execution

    TOD designations have to comply with statutory and institutional requirements. A form that was not properly completed, a beneficiary who is misidentified, ambiguous terms or clerical errors can render the designation void or unenforceable.

  • Revocation

    If the owner revoked the designation before death through a later valid instrument, the earlier designation should not be honored. We regularly see later beneficiary forms or will provisions that superseded an earlier TOD.

Where TOD Disputes Are Litigated

Unlike a will contest, which proceeds in Surrogate’s Court, a TOD dispute can land in several forums depending on the asset and the claim. Many are heard in the Surrogate’s Courts of New York, Kings, Queens, Bronx and Richmond counties, often as a discovery proceeding brought by the estate fiduciary. Civil actions for fraud, conversion and constructive trust go to the New York Supreme Court. Federal court comes into play where there is diversity jurisdiction or a federal statute such as ERISA governs the account, and certain brokerage account disputes go to FINRA arbitration. Choosing the venue is an early decision that affects the procedural rules, the remedies available and the strategy.

The Statute of Limitations: Acting Quickly Matters

New York imposes strict time limits, and the applicable period depends on the theory. A fraud claim generally must be brought within six years of the fraudulent act or two years from discovery, whichever is later. Undue influence and capacity claims are often subject to shorter periods, and some financial institutions impose contractual deadlines for disputing a beneficiary designation. Once the assets have been paid out to the TOD beneficiary, recovery becomes substantially harder.

Anyone considering a challenge should speak to a lawyer as soon as possible. Delay lets assets be dissipated and evidence disappear.

Evidence and Discovery in TOD Contests

A successful challenge is built on investigation and disciplined use of discovery. The documents that matter are the financial institution’s records, including account opening documents and signature cards; the medical records that show the decedent’s physical and cognitive condition; prior wills, trusts and beneficiary forms; and communications among the decedent, the beneficiary and third parties. Caregiver logs, facility records and home health aide notes often fix who was present and when.

That paper is supported by testimony: family members, friends and professionals who dealt with the decedent, and expert witnesses such as geriatric psychiatrists, neurologists and forensic document examiners.

Remedies Available to Successful Challengers

When a designation is set aside, New York courts can grant several forms of relief.

RemedyWhat it does
Voiding the TOD designationThe asset passes through the decedent’s estate under the will or the intestacy laws
Constructive trustAssets already paid to an improper beneficiary are held for the rightful owners
RestitutionFunds that have been transferred are ordered returned
DamagesCompensation for fraud, conversion or breach of fiduciary duty
InjunctionPrevents dissipation of the contested assets while the case is pending

Who Has Standing to Contest a TOD?

Not everyone can bring a challenge. Standing is generally limited to those who would benefit if the designation were set aside: beneficiaries named in the decedent’s will, intestate heirs under EPTL 4-1.1 if there is no valid will, prior beneficiaries who were replaced by the contested designation, the executor or administrator of the estate, and in certain circumstances the estate’s creditors. If you are the named beneficiary defending a designation, see our page on defending a TOD challenge.

How We Handle a TOD Contest

A TOD contest combines estate litigation, financial services law and civil procedure. We have litigated TOD, beneficiary designation and non-probate transfer disputes throughout New York City and the surrounding counties, and we know Surrogate’s Court practice as well as the procedural demands of Supreme Court litigation. We work with medical experts, forensic accountants, handwriting analysts and investigators, because early investigation is usually what produces the evidence that settles a case or wins it at trial. Many TOD disputes resolve through negotiation or mediation, but we prepare each one as if it will be tried; that is what gives a client leverage in settlement discussions.

Steps to Take If You Suspect an Improper TOD

If you believe a designation should be challenged, take these steps now.

  1. Preserve evidence

    Secure copies of the decedent’s estate planning documents, financial records, medical records and relevant communications.

  2. Avoid confrontation with the beneficiary

    Wait until you have spoken with counsel. Statements made in anger can be used against you.

  3. Do not sign waivers or releases

    Financial institutions, the named beneficiary or the estate representative may present them. Sign nothing until it has been reviewed.

  4. Document your relationship with the decedent

    Communications, visits, caregiving and financial support all bear on the natural objects of the decedent’s bounty.

  5. Contact a TOD litigation attorney promptly

    An early evaluation of the claim protects the limitations period and the evidence.

Schedule a Confidential Consultation

If you believe a Transfer on Death designation was created through fraud, undue influence, lack of capacity or another improper means, delay is costly. Call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected] to discuss the designation, your standing and the options available.

Albert Goodwin gave interviews to and appeared on the following media outlets:

ProPublica Forbes ABC CNBC CBS NBC News Discovery Wall Street Journal NPR

Speak with our firm

Call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected] to discuss your matter.

Client Reviews

Verified feedback from our clients

Mr. Goodwin is everything you want in an attorney: professional, honest, thorough, and genuinely caring. He always explains things clearly, so I understood exactly what was happening and what to expect next. His attention to detail and persistence really stood out. Looking back, I feel lucky to have found him. He guided me through the whole process expertly, and I deeply appreciate all his hard work. Would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Sarah M

Legal Services

Thanks to Mr. Albert Goodwin's hard work and smart thinking, I finally won my case, which has been a long time coming. He figured out solutions that no one else could see. I'm really impressed by his strong ethics - something that's rare these days. As my lawyer, he went above and beyond what I expected. I'm so grateful I found him and would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Lawrence H

Legal Services

From our first meeting, I knew I was in great hands with Albert and his associate Katrina. They handled my case with incredible skill and efficiency, even though they took it over from another firm. What impressed me most was how quickly Albert responded to my questions with honest, clear answers - no sugarcoating, just straight talk. They managed a huge workload under tight deadlines, and their fees were very reasonable for such high-quality work. Beyond his legal expertise, Albert's wit and personality made a difficult process much easier to handle. I'm deeply grateful for their hard work and would absolutely choose them again. If you need legal help in New York, you won't find better representation than Albert's firm.

Adam F

Legal Services

VIEW MORE
New York State Bar Association Member Badge New York City Bar Association Member Badge American Bar Association Member Badge Avvo Rated Attorney Badge