SCPA 2110: Attorney Fee Review Surrogate's Court

Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (SCPA) § 2110 gives the New York Surrogate's Court the power to fix and determine the compensation of an attorney for services rendered in an estate matter. In plain terms: no matter what an attorney charged, no matter what a retainer agreement says, and no matter whether the fee has already been paid, the Surrogate's Court can review the fee, decide what amount is actually reasonable, and order the attorney to refund the difference. It is the primary statutory mechanism for challenging excessive legal fees in New York estate administration.

This page explains what SCPA 2110 says, who can invoke it, the factors courts apply, how the proceeding works step by step, worked examples with real numbers, and the mistakes that most often defeat or delay a fee challenge.

What SCPA 2110 Does in Plain Language

When someone dies in New York, the executor or administrator (the "fiduciary") almost always hires an attorney, and that attorney's fee is typically paid out of the estate. Beneficiaries frequently discover the amount of the fee only at the end of the administration, when they receive an accounting — and by then the money has usually already been paid out of estate funds.

SCPA 2110 solves this problem in three ways:

• Review at any time. Under SCPA 2110(1), the court may fix an attorney's compensation "at any time during the administration of an estate," whether or not any other proceeding is pending. A beneficiary does not have to wait for a formal accounting.
• Review of anyone's attorney. The statute covers services rendered to a fiduciary and services rendered to a devisee, legatee, distributee, or any person interested in the estate. It is not limited to the executor's counsel.
• Refund power. If the fee has already been paid, the court can direct the attorney to refund the amount that exceeds reasonable compensation. Payment does not put a fee beyond the court's reach.

The Statutory Framework

SCPA 2110(1): The Power to Fix Compensation

Subdivision 1 authorizes the Surrogate to fix and determine the compensation of an attorney for services rendered to a fiduciary or to a person interested in the estate. Two features of the language matter in practice:

• "At any time during the administration" means a fee proceeding can be brought as a standalone matter — a beneficiary need not first compel an accounting under SCPA 2205, although fee objections are also routinely raised within accounting proceedings.
• "Services rendered" limits the court's jurisdiction to legal work performed in connection with the estate. Fees for unrelated legal matters — for example, personal legal work performed for the executor individually — are generally outside the scope of a 2110 proceeding.

SCPA 2110(2)–(3): Who May Petition and Who Pays

The proceeding may be instituted by petition of the fiduciary, the attorney whose fee is at issue, or a person interested in the estate. Attorneys themselves use SCPA 2110 when a fiduciary refuses to pay a legitimate bill; beneficiaries use it when a fee looks excessive.

The statute also addresses the source of payment: the court may direct that the fee be paid from the estate generally or from funds in the hands of the fiduciary belonging to a particular legatee, devisee, distributee, or person interested. In Matter of Hyde, 15 N.Y.3d 179 (2010), the New York Court of Appeals confirmed that the Surrogate has discretion to allocate fees against the shares of the specific parties whose conduct generated the work or who benefited from it, rather than spreading the cost across all beneficiaries. This matters enormously in contested matters: a beneficiary who forces unnecessary litigation may end up bearing the resulting legal fees out of his or her own share.

The Court's Power to Act on Its Own

Even when no one objects, the Surrogate has independent authority to inquire into the reasonableness of attorney fees. In Matter of Stortecky v. Mazzone, 85 N.Y.2d 518 (1995), the Court of Appeals held that the Surrogate bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees charged to an estate and may reduce a fee sua sponte, even where the fiduciary and all beneficiaries have consented to it. A retainer agreement, a signed consent, or a receipt-and-release does not strip the court of this supervisory power.

Retainer Agreements Do Not Control

A common misconception is that a signed retainer agreement fixes the fee. It does not. In Surrogate's Court, the retainer agreement is evidence of the parties' expectations, but the court is not bound by it. The controlling question is always whether the fee is reasonable for the services actually rendered. The burden of proving reasonableness rests on the attorney — not on the beneficiary challenging the fee. This burden allocation, rooted in Matter of Potts, 213 App. Div. 59 (4th Dep't 1925), aff'd 241 N.Y. 593 (1925), is one of the most important practical features of a 2110 proceeding.

The Factors Courts Apply: Potts and Freeman

New York Surrogates evaluate fee reasonableness under the factors articulated in Matter of Potts and Matter of Freeman, 34 N.Y.2d 1 (1974):

• Time and labor required — the hours actually and reasonably spent;
• Difficulty of the questions involved — routine probate versus contested litigation, tax complexity, kinship issues;
• Skill required to handle the problems presented;
• The attorney's experience, ability, and reputation;
• The amount involved and the benefit to the estate — including the size of the estate and the results obtained;
• Customary fees charged for similar services;
• The results obtained;
• Responsibility involved in the representation.

No single factor controls. Time spent is significant but not dispositive — a court may award more than pure hourly billing would suggest where the results were exceptional, or less where hours were inflated, duplicative, or spent on tasks that were clerical rather than legal in nature. Executorial tasks (paying bills, arranging for property cleanouts, routine banking) performed by the attorney are generally not compensable as legal services, because those tasks are what the executor's commission under SCPA 2307 already pays for.

Percentage Fees and Time Records

Some attorneys charge estates a flat percentage of the gross estate — commonly quoted at 5% or more. New York courts have repeatedly held that there is no per se percentage fee for estate work. A percentage arrangement is subject to the same reasonableness review as any other fee, and where the percentage produces a number far out of proportion to the work performed, courts reduce it. Similarly, while contemporaneous time records are not strictly mandatory in Surrogate's Court, an attorney who cannot document time spent starts the proceeding at a serious disadvantage, and courts routinely discount reconstructed or vague time claims.

Worked Examples

Example 1: Percentage Fee on a Routine Estate

An estate consists of a house sold for $500,000, bank accounts of $250,000, and a brokerage account of $50,000 — a gross estate of $800,000. The will is admitted to probate without objection. The attorney charged the executor a flat 5% fee: $40,000, paid from estate funds without court approval.

A beneficiary petitions under SCPA 2110. The attorney's affirmation of services shows roughly 45 hours of genuinely legal work: preparing the probate petition, obtaining letters testamentary, coordinating the house closing, and preparing an informal accounting. Applying the Freeman factors, the court determines that reasonable compensation is $17,500, and directs the attorney to refund $22,500 to the estate. The percentage arrangement in the retainer does not save the fee.

Example 2: A Higher Fee Sustained in Contested Litigation

A $1,200,000 estate is tied up in a will contest involving allegations of undue influence, document discovery, SCPA 1404 examinations, depositions, and motion practice over two years. Counsel for the executor billed $85,000, supported by detailed contemporaneous time records showing over 200 hours, and the will was ultimately sustained. On review, the court approves the full fee: the difficulty of the issues, the time documented, and the result obtained all support it. SCPA 2110 is a reasonableness check, not an automatic fee-reduction device.

Example 3: Allocating the Fee to One Beneficiary's Share

One of four residuary beneficiaries files meritless objections to an accounting, forcing the executor's attorney to spend $12,000 defending the account. Objections are dismissed. Applying Matter of Hyde, the court charges that $12,000 against the objecting beneficiary's residuary share rather than against the estate generally, so the three other beneficiaries do not subsidize litigation they did not cause.

SCPA 2111: Advance Payments Are Always Provisional

SCPA 2111 permits a fiduciary to pay an attorney on account, before court approval, pursuant to a written agreement. This is why estate attorneys are commonly paid during the administration rather than at the end. But every such payment is provisional: it remains subject to review, and if the court ultimately fixes a lower fee, the excess must be refunded. An attorney cannot defend an excessive fee on the ground that the executor agreed to it and already paid it.

Attorney Fees Are Not Executor Commissions

Beneficiaries reviewing an accounting should keep two distinct charges separate:

• Executor's commissions are the fiduciary's statutory compensation, calculated on a sliding percentage scale under SCPA 2307.
• Attorney's fees are compensation for legal services and are governed by the reasonableness standard of SCPA 2110 — there is no statutory percentage.

Where the same person serves as both executor and attorney, the scrutiny intensifies. The attorney-executor may not bill legal fees for executorial work, and where the attorney drafted the will naming himself or herself as executor, SCPA 2307-a requires a specific written disclosure to the testator; absent the required acknowledgment, the attorney-executor's commissions are reduced to one-half the statutory amount.

Procedure: How a SCPA 2110 Proceeding Works

1. Choose the vehicle. A fee challenge can be brought (a) as a standalone petition under SCPA 2110 in the Surrogate's Court where the estate is being administered, or (b) as objections to the attorney fee item within a pending accounting proceeding. If no accounting has been filed and the fiduciary is stalling, a beneficiary may combine the fee issue with a petition to compel an accounting under SCPA 2205.
2. File the petition. The petition identifies the estate, the attorney, the services at issue, the amounts charged and paid, and the relief sought — fixation of the fee and a refund of any excess.
3. Citation issues and is served. The court issues a citation to the attorney, the fiduciary, and other interested persons, served in accordance with SCPA 306–307. The citation sets a return date.
4. The attorney submits an affirmation of legal services. Under the Uniform Rules for Surrogate's Court (22 NYCRR 207.45), the attorney must provide a detailed statement of the services rendered, the time spent, the amounts received and from whom, and any retainer arrangement. Time records, invoices, and the estate file are the core evidence.
5. Discovery and hearing, if needed. Many fee determinations are decided on papers. Where facts are disputed — hours claimed, work actually performed, whether tasks were legal or executorial — the court may order disclosure and hold an evidentiary hearing at which the attorney bears the burden of proving reasonableness.
6. Decision and decree. The court fixes the reasonable fee, identifies the source of payment (the estate generally or a particular share under the Hyde allocation principles), and, where payments exceeded the fixed amount, directs a refund. The refund directive is enforceable like any other Surrogate's Court decree.

Timing and Deadlines

• During administration: SCPA 2110(1) allows the petition "at any time during the administration of an estate." There is no requirement to wait for the accounting.
• At the accounting: The accounting is the natural checkpoint. Objections to legal fees shown on the account must be filed by the deadline the court sets after the return of citation — missing it can forfeit the challenge.
• After a decree: This is the critical cutoff. Once a decree judicially settling the account is entered and the fee was disclosed and passed upon, the decree is generally res judicata on the fee. Reopening it requires grounds such as fraud, newly discovered evidence, or lack of jurisdiction — a much steeper climb. Challenge fees before the accounting decree is entered.
• Receipts and releases: A beneficiary who signed a release after full and fair disclosure of the fee may be bound; a release procured without disclosure of the fee's amount or basis is vulnerable. Read releases carefully before signing.

Common Pitfalls

• Assuming the retainer agreement is final. It is not. The Surrogate independently determines reasonableness (Stortecky).
• Assuming a paid fee cannot be recovered. SCPA 2110 authorizes refund directives; payment under SCPA 2111 is always provisional.
• Waiting until after the accounting decree. The decree ordinarily forecloses the challenge. Act while the accounting is pending or earlier.
• Confusing commissions with legal fees, or overlooking an attorney-executor billing legal fees for executorial tasks.
• Accepting a percentage fee as "standard." New York has no standard percentage attorney fee for estates; the fee must match the work.
• Litigating without weighing Hyde exposure. A beneficiary who pursues baseless objections may be charged with the resulting fees out of his or her own share.
• Attorneys: failing to keep contemporaneous time records. Because the attorney bears the burden of proof, thin documentation frequently translates directly into a reduced fee.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I challenge the fee if I am only one of several beneficiaries?

Yes. Any "person interested" in the estate — including a single residuary or specific beneficiary — has standing to petition under SCPA 2110.

Does the executor have to consent to the fee challenge?

No. The proceeding may be brought by a beneficiary directly, and the court can review the fee even over the executor's objection or consent to it.

What if the attorney was paid from my specific bequest?

The court controls the source of payment. If a fee was improperly charged against a share that should not bear it, the court can reallocate the burden and direct restoration.

Can the attorney charge for defending the fee?

Time spent by an attorney justifying his or her own fee is generally not compensable from the estate; courts distinguish work that benefited the estate from work that benefited only the attorney.

Albert Goodwin is a New York estate attorney who represents beneficiaries, fiduciaries, and attorneys in SCPA 2110 fee proceedings and related accounting matters throughout the New York Surrogate's Courts. If you believe an estate has been charged an excessive legal fee, or you need to defend or fix a fee, you can contact the office to discuss your situation.

Related resources on this site: how much a probate lawyer costs, estate planning costs.