A special needs trust, also called a supplemental needs trust or SNT, holds assets for the benefit of a person with a disability without those assets counting against eligibility for means-tested government programs. In New York that primarily means Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), OPWDD-funded services, Section 8 and other subsidized housing, and SNAP.
The stakes are concrete. As of 2024, SSI has a resource limit of $2,000 for an individual and $3,000 for a couple. New York’s non-MAGI Medicaid program, the category covering most people who are disabled, blind or 65 and older, uses a resource limit of $31,175 for a single person and an income limit of $1,732 per month in 2024. These figures adjust annually, so confirm the current levels with the New York State Department of Health before making planning decisions. An inheritance, personal injury settlement or retroactive benefits award of even a modest amount can push a person over these limits and cut off benefits, including, in the case of Medicaid, home care or OPWDD services that cannot realistically be replaced with private funds.
A properly drafted and administered SNT solves this problem. The trust owns the assets, the trustee spends them to supplement what government programs provide, and the beneficiary remains eligible.
Special needs trusts in New York rest on both state and federal authority. Because both a state statute and federal rules apply, a trust that works in another state may not satisfy New York’s requirements, and vice versa; the document has to be drafted to both standards.
| Authority | What it does |
|---|---|
| New York EPTL § 7-1.12 | Expressly authorizes supplemental needs trusts for a “person with a severe and chronic or persistent disability.” The trust document must clearly evidence the creator’s intent that trust assets supplement, not supplant government benefits, and must prohibit the trustee from making distributions that would reduce or eliminate the beneficiary’s benefits, with limited exceptions where the trustee determines a distribution is in the beneficiary’s best interests. |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A) and (d)(4)(C) | Enacted as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA ’93). These create the federal exceptions that allow a disabled person’s own assets to be held in trust without counting for Medicaid. |
| New York Social Services Law § 366 | Implements those federal exceptions for New York Medicaid. |
| SSA POMS SI 01120.200–01120.203 | Govern how the Social Security Administration evaluates trusts for SSI purposes. |
Which trust is right depends first on whose money it is, and then on the beneficiary’s age and the amount involved. The sections that follow explain each, but the differences are easiest to see side by side.
| Feature | Third-party SNT | First-party (d)(4)(A) SNT | Pooled (d)(4)(C) trust |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whose assets | Someone else’s, typically parents or grandparents | The disabled person’s own | The disabled person’s own |
| Age limit | None | Beneficiary must be under 65 when the trust is established and funded | None; a sub-account can be opened at 65 or older, though transfers by a person 65+ can trigger a transfer penalty for nursing home Medicaid |
| Medicaid payback at death | No; the remainder passes to whomever the creator names | Yes, to every state that paid Medicaid for the beneficiary | Similar payback, but the nonprofit is typically permitted to retain some or all of the remainder for its charitable mission, depending on the program’s terms |
| Who runs it | A trustee chosen by the creator | A trustee, often under court supervision | A nonprofit organization |
A third-party SNT is funded with assets that never belonged to the disabled person, typically money from parents or grandparents. It is the standard vehicle for leaving an inheritance to a child or relative with a disability. Leaving assets outright would disqualify the beneficiary from benefits, while disinheriting them, or leaving the money informally to a sibling “to take care of” the disabled child, is risky and unenforceable.
Because the assets were never the beneficiary’s, New York cannot demand reimbursement from the trust at the beneficiary’s death; the remainder passes to whomever the trust creator names, often other children or grandchildren. There is no age limit on the beneficiary, unlike a first-party (d)(4)(A) trust. The structure is flexible: it can be a living (inter vivos) trust funded during the parents’ lifetime, a testamentary trust inside the parents’ wills, or a lightly funded living trust designed to receive life insurance proceeds and bequests later.
An inter vivos third-party SNT has a practical advantage in New York families. Once it exists, grandparents, aunts and uncles can direct their own gifts and bequests to the same trust instead of accidentally leaving money outright to the disabled beneficiary, a mistake that otherwise forces an expensive after-the-fact fix.
A first-party, or self-settled, SNT under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(A) is used when the disabled person already owns or is about to receive assets: a personal injury settlement, an outright inheritance, a retroactive SSI or Social Security award. Federal law imposes four conditions. The beneficiary must be under age 65 when the trust is established and funded, and must meet the Social Security definition of disability. The trust must be established by the individual, a parent, a grandparent, a legal guardian or a court; the individual gained the right to establish their own trust under the Special Needs Trust Fairness Act, enacted in the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016.
Finally, the trust must contain a Medicaid payback provision. At the beneficiary’s death, remaining trust assets must first reimburse the state (in practice, the New York State Department of Health and local districts such as NYC HRA) for Medicaid paid on the beneficiary’s behalf during their lifetime, from any state, not only New York.
In practice, many first-party SNTs in New York pass through a court, and the route depends on how the money arrived.
| Proceeding | When it applies | What the court does |
|---|---|---|
| Personal injury compromise (CPLR 1206–1208) | Settlements for minors or incapacitated persons, which require court approval | The compromise order can direct settlement proceeds into an SNT; the court reviews the trust terms before signing. |
| Article 81 guardianship (Mental Hygiene Law) | An incapacitated adult with assets | The Supreme Court guardianship judge can authorize the guardian to establish and fund an SNT with the incapacitated person’s assets. |
| SCPA Article 17-A guardianship | Adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities, in Surrogate’s Court | Often intersects with SNT planning when the ward receives an inheritance. |
| Surrogate’s Court estate proceeding | A disabled distributee is set to inherit outright, for example in an intestate estate | The court and the guardian ad litem will frequently look to an SNT to receive the share. |
Court-established SNTs in New York typically come with ongoing obligations, such as bonding, periodic accountings and sometimes prior court approval for large distributions, that the trustee must understand before accepting the role.
A pooled trust under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(C) is run by a nonprofit organization. Each beneficiary has a separate sub-account, but funds are pooled for investment and administration. New York has several long-established nonprofit pooled trust programs; NYSARC Trust Services is among the best known. They serve two distinct purposes.
A pooled trust makes sense for smaller sums, where the cost of drafting and administering an individual trust is not justified, or where no suitable individual trustee exists. Unlike a (d)(4)(A) trust, a pooled trust sub-account can be established for a beneficiary who is 65 or older, though transfers by a person 65 or older can trigger a transfer-of-assets penalty for nursing home Medicaid, which must be analyzed case by case.
This use is distinctively important in New York. A person receiving community Medicaid (home care) whose monthly income exceeds the Medicaid income limit would normally have to pay the excess, the “surplus” or “spend-down,” toward their care. New York permits that surplus income to be deposited monthly into a pooled trust sub-account instead, where it can then be used to pay the person’s rent, utilities and other living expenses. Done correctly, this eliminates the spend-down while keeping full Medicaid home care coverage.
At the beneficiary’s death, pooled trusts have a payback obligation similar to (d)(4)(A) trusts, though the nonprofit is typically permitted to retain some or all of the remainder for its charitable mission rather than refunding it to the state, depending on the program’s terms.
A note on timing: New York enacted a lookback period for community-based long-term care Medicaid, but its implementation has been repeatedly delayed. Because the rules in this area continue to change, planning that relies on transfers, including transfers to pooled trusts, should be reviewed against the current state of the law.
Getting the trust drafted is half the job; administering it correctly is the other half. Under the SSI rules in POMS SI 01120.200 et seq., what matters is who receives the payment and what it pays for.
| Type of distribution | Effect on SSI |
|---|---|
| Cash paid directly to the beneficiary | Counts as income and reduces SSI dollar for dollar. |
| Payments for food or shelter (rent, mortgage, utilities, groceries) | Count as in-kind support and maintenance and can reduce the SSI check by up to one-third of the federal benefit rate ($943 per month for an individual in 2024). |
| Payments to third parties for anything else: therapies Medicaid does not cover, a wheelchair-accessible vehicle, education, electronics, travel, companions, furniture, clothing | Generally no effect on SSI at all. |
Sometimes a trustee deliberately accepts the one-third reduction because paying the beneficiary’s rent is worth more than the SSI lost. That should be a calculated decision, not an accident.
The working rules for a New York trustee follow from this. Pay vendors and providers directly and never hand the beneficiary cash. Keep records showing the purpose of every distribution, so the trustee can respond if the Social Security Administration or the local Medicaid district questions it. Coordinate with the beneficiary’s Medicaid caseworker or care manager before large or unusual distributions. And report the trust’s existence to SSA and the Medicaid district when required; hiding a trust is far more damaging than disclosing it.
The most common funding source is life insurance, often a second-to-die policy on both parents, naming the SNT as beneficiary. This creates substantial funding at the point it is needed most, at relatively low premium cost if started early. Bequests under the parents’ wills direct the disabled child’s share into the trust rather than to the child outright, and gifts from extended family can be directed to the existing trust.
Retirement accounts can name the SNT as beneficiary, but this requires careful drafting after the federal SECURE Act. A properly structured trust for a disabled beneficiary (an “eligible designated beneficiary”) can still stretch distributions over the beneficiary’s life expectancy; a poorly drafted one loses that treatment.
A New York ABLE account, established under New York’s ABLE program, can work alongside an SNT for smaller, more routine expenses. Notably, ABLE funds can pay housing costs without the SSI in-kind support reduction that trust payments trigger. ABLE accounts have annual contribution limits and their own Medicaid payback feature, so they complement rather than replace an SNT.
The trustee will make judgment calls affecting the beneficiary’s benefits for decades. The options are a family member, often with a professional co-trustee or advisor; a bank or trust company for larger trusts; or a nonprofit pooled trust as trustee-administrator. For court-established trusts, New York courts will scrutinize the proposed trustee and may require a bond and periodic accountings in Surrogate’s Court or Supreme Court.
Alongside the trust, we encourage parents to prepare a letter of intent: an informal, non-binding document describing the beneficiary’s medical history, daily routines, preferences, providers, important relationships, and religious or cultural considerations. It is not a legal instrument, but it transfers decades of parental knowledge to the future trustee and caregivers, and it is often the single most useful document in the file after the parents are gone.
| Mistake | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Leaving an inheritance outright to a disabled child | Forces a court-supervised first-party SNT with a Medicaid payback, when a third-party SNT with no payback would have avoided it. |
| Using a generic out-of-state form | The form may fail EPTL 7-1.12’s supplement-not-supplant language or omit the required payback terms for a first-party trust. |
| Paying rent and groceries from the trust without checking | An unplanned reduction in the beneficiary’s SSI. |
| Funding a (d)(4)(A) trust after the beneficiary turns 65 | The trust does not qualify; a pooled trust was the only available option. |
| Failing to disclose the trust to SSA or the Medicaid district | Overpayment demands. |
Whether you are a parent planning an inheritance for a child with a disability, a personal injury attorney with a disabled client about to receive a settlement, or a family member handling an estate with a disabled heir, the right trust structure depends on whose money it is, the beneficiary’s age and benefits, and the courts involved. You can read more about attorney Albert Goodwin, or about related planning tools such as the benefits of a living trust and avoiding probate in New York.
To discuss whether a special needs trust is right for your family, call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected].