A guardian of the person in New York is appointed under Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law to make decisions about the personal needs of an incapacitated person (the "incapacitated person" or IP). Under MHL §81.22, those decisions can include where the person lives, who provides their care, their medical treatment, their daily activities, and protection from abuse or exploitation. The exact authority a guardian holds is defined by the order of the Supreme Court (or, in some counties, the County Court) that appointed them. New York follows a "least restrictive" principle, so a court grants only the specific personal-needs powers the evidence shows the person actually needs — not blanket control over the person's life.
This page focuses specifically on personal-needs powers (decisions about the person's body, health, and living situation). For the separate role of managing money, property, and income, see our companion page on the guardian of the property. For how a guardianship case actually gets started, the petition, the court evaluator, and the hearing, see our overview of the Article 81 guardianship process.
A guardian of the person derives authority from the appointing order, which the court tailors under MHL §81.22 (powers of guardians regarding personal needs). The court can grant some, all, or only a narrow subset of the powers enumerated in the statute, depending on the functional limitations established at the hearing under MHL §81.02 (standard for appointment). Always read the actual order before acting — a guardian who exceeds the powers granted can be surcharged or removed under MHL §81.35 and §81.36.
The personal-needs powers a New York court most commonly grants include the authority to:
Notably, §81.22(a)(9) restricts a guardian's ability to place a person in a nursing home or residential facility against the person's will and limits consent to certain treatments — a key reason engaged guardians work closely with counsel before a major placement.
One of the most consequential parts of personal guardianship is medical decision-making. If the order grants medical authority under §81.22, the guardian generally consents to treatment, hospitalization, and care planning. New York's Family Health Care Decisions Act (FHCDA), codified at Public Health Law Article 29-CC, supplies the standard for surrogate health care decisions in hospitals and nursing homes — including the requirement to decide based on the person's wishes, or, if those are not reasonably known, the person's best interests.
Areas where medical decision-making becomes more complex:
Where the person lives is among the most consequential decisions a guardian makes. New York's least-restrictive principle favors keeping a person in the community when it is safe and feasible. Common options include:
A guardian generally cannot move the person to a nursing home over the person's objection on the guardian's authority alone; §81.22(a)(9) and the appointing order may require a specific court application. In New York City, guardianship cases are heard in the Supreme Court of the county where the person resides (for example, New York County in Manhattan, Kings County in Brooklyn, Queens County, Bronx County, and Richmond County), and judges in these parts are accustomed to placement disputes and will expect a clear clinical record before approving an involuntary placement.
Incapacitated New Yorkers are frequent targets of exploitation by caregivers, acquaintances, telemarketers, and online scammers. A guardian of the person should screen for and intervene in abuse and exploitation. Warning signs include unexplained account withdrawals, sudden gifts to caregivers or new acquaintances, isolation from longtime family and friends, new "helpers" or "advisors" appearing, and documents the person does not understand. A guardian who sees these patterns should act quickly, document the activity, restrict access where appropriate, and consult counsel. Where there is danger, the guardian may seek an order of protection and should contact the police or Adult Protective Services. Note that freezing or recovering misappropriated funds is generally a property-side remedy — see the guardian of the property page and our overview of discovery and turnover proceedings for recovering stolen assets.
Many wards rely on Medicaid, Medicare, Supplemental Security Income, Social Security, or veterans benefits. A guardian of the person commonly applies for, maintains, and recertifies these benefits, and pursues appeals (such as a Medicaid fair hearing) when benefits are denied or reduced. Missing a recertification deadline can interrupt care, so this administrative work matters. Where benefits decisions intersect with the person's funds — spend-down, pooled income trusts, or supplemental needs trusts — coordination with the property guardian is essential.
Article 81 requires guardians to remain meaningfully involved. A guardian should visit regularly, know the caregivers and medical team by name, and watch for changes in condition. Engaged guardians visit far more often than any minimum and use visits to confirm the person is well cared for — observing cleanliness, clothing, mobility, mood, and alertness that paper reports cannot convey.
Guardians of the person must also file an annual report with the court under MHL §81.31, addressing the person's living situation, medical condition, social activities, and major decisions made during the year, and an initial report under §81.30. In New York City, these reports are reviewed by the court and, frequently, by a court examiner. Timely, complete reports demonstrate good guardianship; late or incomplete ones invite scrutiny and can lead to removal under §81.35.
New York permits a court to appoint a guardian of the person, a guardian of the property, or both — and they need not be the same person. A guardian of the person makes decisions about health, care, and living situation. A guardian of the property manages bank accounts, investments, income, bills, and assets under MHL §81.21. To understand the full picture, read this page alongside the guardian of the property page and the Article 81 guardianship process overview.
Yes, if the appointing order grants medical authority under MHL §81.22. Decisions follow the standards of the Family Health Care Decisions Act — the person's wishes if known, otherwise their best interests — with heightened rules for end-of-life and psychiatric decisions.
Not automatically over the person's objection. MHL §81.22 limits involuntary placement, and the appointing order may require a specific court application before a nursing home or residential placement.
No. Money and property are managed by a guardian of the property under MHL §81.21. The two roles can be held by the same person or by different people.
An initial report under MHL §81.30 and an annual report under MHL §81.31, describing the person's living situation, health, activities, and major decisions.
If you are considering serving as guardian of the person for a family member, or are already serving and need legal support in a New York City Supreme Court guardianship proceeding, contact the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected]. You can also learn more about the attorney or explore our related guardianship and estate resources.