
What is a pecuniary interest? Generally speaking, is an interest relating to money.
In New York, when a loved one dies and leaves a will that needs to be admitted to probate, only those persons who have pecuniary interest have standing to contest a will. Standing is the legal capacity to bring an action to court. The court will not an entertain a challenge from a person who does not have standing to contest a will.
The following people can contest a will because they have a pecuniary interest or an interest relating to money:
For example, D dies, survived by his spouse, A, and their two children, B and C. His parents, X and Y, and sibling, Z, are still alive. In D’s one and only last will and testament, he left all his assets to his spouse and children, A, B, and C. His parents and sibling, X, Y, and Z seek to contest the will in court. Will the court entertain the suit of X, Y, and Z? No, because X, Y, and Z do not have pecuniary or financial interest in the will. Because D is survived by his spouse and two children, even if D dies without a will, X, Y, and Z will not inherit from D under New York’s intestate laws.
If, however, D executed a previous will where he left something for his parents, X and Y, as beneficiaries, the new will where he left everything to his spouse and children, A, B, and C, can be contested by X and Y, but not by his sibling Z.
If you feel that you have been omitted unfairly from a will, consult an experienced estates lawyer to see whether you have standing or sufficient pecuniary interest to contest a will. This will save you from thousands of dollars in litigation, only to learn later that the court has dismissed your case due to lack of legal standing.
If you have an issue with what is a pecuniary interest, you can get in touch with us, the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin. We can be reached at 212-233-1233 or 212-233-1233.
Standing is a threshold question in any legal proceeding. The court will not hear a case brought by someone who does not have the legal capacity to bring it, regardless of how compelling the underlying facts might be. This rule applies in every court — federal and state, trial and appellate — and Surrogate's Court is no exception. A will contest brought by a party without pecuniary interest is dismissed before it ever reaches the merits.
The reason is structural. Litigation consumes court resources, imposes costs on the parties, and produces decisions that bind the parties going forward. Allowing strangers to bring claims they have no real stake in would waste those resources, harass the people who are actually affected, and produce decisions with no real-world consequences. The pecuniary interest rule limits standing to people whose money is actually at stake.
The basic rule — you need to be financially better off if the will is set aside — sounds simple, but the application can be subtle. A few illustrative scenarios:
Disinherited child. An adult child who would inherit by intestacy under EPTL § 4-1.1 if the will were set aside has standing, even if the child was never named in the will. The child stands to gain by intestacy if the contest succeeds.
Disinherited but unrelated person. A long-term partner, a close friend, or a caregiver who is named in the will but has no claim under intestacy is in a more complicated position. They have standing to defend the will (because they would lose under intestacy), but they do not have standing to contest the same will unless they would inherit under a prior will.
Beneficiary of a prior will. Someone who received a substantial bequest in a prior will but was cut out of the new will has standing to challenge the new will. The prior will provides the alternative to which they would be returned if the new will is set aside.
Spouse separated but not divorced. A spouse retains rights under EPTL § 5-1.1-A (the elective share) and as an intestate heir unless legally disqualified. The spouse has standing to bring a contest even if estranged.
Grandchildren whose parent is alive. A grandchild does not inherit by intestacy if the grandchild's parent (the decedent's child) is alive. Grandchildren whose parent is living typically lack standing to contest unless they were named in a prior will.
Beneficiaries of revocable trusts. Someone who would benefit if a revocable trust amendment is set aside has analogous standing to challenge the amendment, even though the proceeding is in Supreme Court rather than Surrogate's Court.
In a typical will contest, the question of standing arises in two ways. First, when the would-be contestant files a notice of appearance and demands SCPA § 1404 examinations, the proponent may challenge the appearance on standing grounds. The court will then evaluate the contestant's claimed interest. Second, when formal objections are eventually filed, the proponent can move to dismiss for lack of standing, with the court resolving the question on motion papers or after limited discovery.
Standing is typically demonstrated through documentation — the contestant's birth certificate showing relationship to the decedent, a certified copy of the prior will showing the contestant's bequest, and similar evidence. Lay testimony can supplement documents but documents are usually the primary proof.
The pecuniary interest rule has important strategic implications for both proponents and contestants:
For proponents. If the people who would be most upset by the will lack standing to contest, the proponent is in a stronger position. Examples include cases where the decedent's natural heirs are surviving spouse and children and the disinherited parties are nieces, nephews, or others without standing.
For contestants. Before filing or even threatening a contest, evaluate standing carefully. A contest filed without standing is a wasted effort that ends in dismissal. Time and legal fees spent on the contest are lost. Worse, if the contestant is also a beneficiary under the current will, an unsuccessful contest could trigger an in terrorem clause.
An interesting wrinkle is that having standing to contest does not always mean it is wise to contest. A beneficiary who is named in the will and would receive something under the in terrorem clause if they accept the will may have more to lose by contesting than to gain. The math is: what the beneficiary gets under the will (and loses if the contest fails and the no-contest clause triggers) versus what the beneficiary would get if the contest succeeds.
For beneficiaries near or below their intestate share — "near the line" — the decision can be close. For beneficiaries deeply disinherited (or receiving only a token bequest), the contest may be obviously worthwhile because the downside is minimal.
The pecuniary interest concept applies in other Surrogate's Court proceedings besides will contests:
Across all of these, the threshold question is the same — does the petitioner have an actual financial stake in the outcome?
If you are uncertain whether you have standing in a particular situation, the right first step is a consultation with an attorney. We can review the will, the family tree, any prior wills you may know about, and the broader circumstances to evaluate standing before any meaningful time or money is invested in a contest. Sometimes the question is easy. Sometimes it requires more research. Either way, getting the analysis right at the start protects you from making a costly mistake.