
In New York, you can contest a will only if admitting that will to probate would cost you money. Lawyers call this a pecuniary interest. The rule comes from Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (SCPA) § 1410, which allows objections to probate from "any person whose interest in property or in the estate of the testator would be adversely affected by the admission of the will to probate." If you do not meet that test, the Surrogate's Court will dismiss your objections without ever looking at whether the will is valid.
This page explains who meets that test, who does not, and how standing is proven and challenged in a New York probate proceeding. If you already know you have standing and want to discuss bringing a contest, see our will contest attorney page. For disputes among heirs that do not involve challenging the will itself, see our NYC inheritance dispute page.
In practice, people with standing to object to a New York will fall into two groups:
The broader term "person interested" is defined in SCPA § 103. It generally covers anyone entitled, or allegedly entitled, to share as a beneficiary in the estate. Being a person interested is not enough by itself to object to probate. Under SCPA § 1410, your interest must be one that the will would actually harm.
D dies survived by his spouse, A, and their two children, B and C. D's parents, X and Y, and his sibling, Z, are also alive. D's only will leaves everything to A, B and C. X, Y and Z want to contest it.
The court will not hear their objections. Under EPTL § 4-1.1, when a decedent leaves a spouse and children, the spouse receives $50,000 plus one-half of the balance, and the children share the rest. Parents and siblings receive nothing. Setting the will aside would not put any money in the hands of X, Y or Z, so none of them is adversely affected.
Change one fact. Suppose D signed an earlier will that left a gift to his parents, X and Y. If the new will were denied probate, that earlier will could be offered instead, and X and Y would take their gift. X and Y now have standing to object to the new will. Z still does not, because Z received nothing under either will and would inherit nothing by intestacy.
The table below is a starting point. Standing always turns on the specific family tree, the terms of every will that exists, and how large each share would be. Have an attorney confirm your position before you act.
| Person | Standing to object? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Surviving spouse | Usually yes | A spouse is a first-priority distributee under EPTL § 4-1.1. A spouse can lose that status through disqualification under EPTL § 5-1.2 (for example, abandonment or a final divorce) or a valid written waiver. |
| Spouse who is separated but not divorced | Usually yes | Separation alone does not end inheritance rights. A separation agreement that waives estate rights, or a disqualification under EPTL § 5-1.2, can remove standing. |
| Child of the decedent | Yes, if the will gives the child less than the intestate share | Children are distributees. A child left out of the will entirely has standing. A child who receives more under the will than by intestacy does not. |
| Grandchild whose parent is alive | No, unless named in a prior will | Grandchildren inherit by representation only in place of a deceased parent. While the parent is living, the grandchild is not a distributee. |
| Grandchild whose parent died before the decedent | Depends | The grandchild may step into the deceased parent's share by representation, which can create standing. |
| Parent of the decedent | Only if there is no surviving spouse or child, or under a prior will | Parents inherit by intestacy only when the decedent left no spouse and no issue. |
| Sibling | Only if there is no spouse, child or parent, or under a prior will | Siblings are further down the intestate order. |
| Niece or nephew | Depends | A niece or nephew can be a distributee if there is no spouse, issue or parent, and the niece or nephew's own parent (the decedent's sibling) has died. Otherwise standing requires a prior will. |
| Unmarried partner, friend or caregiver | Only under a prior will | New York intestacy does not include unmarried partners or caregivers. See also when an aunt leaves an inheritance to a caretaker. |
| Beneficiary under a prior will | Yes, if the prior will gave more | The prior will is the alternative that would take effect if the new will fails. |
| Beneficiary under the current will | Only if adversely affected | A named beneficiary can object only if the beneficiary would do better by intestacy or under a prior will. |
| Creditor of the decedent | Generally no | A creditor is paid ahead of beneficiaries whether or not the will is admitted, so the will does not affect the creditor's claim. |
Standing based on an earlier will raises proof issues that standing based on family relationship does not.
A person named in another will that has been filed with the Surrogate's Court, whose interest the propounded will would harm, is among those who must receive a citation under SCPA § 1403. That notice often gives prior-will beneficiaries their first formal opportunity to appear.
Many New York estate plans put most of the assets in a revocable trust, with a short pour-over will. Challenging only the will may accomplish little if the trust controls the money.
The standing logic for trusts is the same. A person who would benefit if a trust amendment were set aside, for example a beneficiary under an earlier version of the trust, has an interest that the amendment harms. New York's Surrogate's Courts have broad jurisdiction over the affairs of decedents under SCPA §§ 201 and 209, and they regularly hear disputes over a decedent's lifetime trusts. The Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction. When the trust dispute is tied to an estate already before the Surrogate, the Surrogate's Court is usually where it is heard. For more on trust disputes, see our NYC trust attorney page.
Standing is a threshold issue. It can come up at several points in a New York probate proceeding:
Relationship-based standing is usually proven with vital records such as birth, marriage and death certificates. Where family relationships are complicated, the court may require additional proof. See our pages on the affidavit of heirship and when an affidavit of heir is required. For where these steps fall in a typical case, see our sample NYC probate timeline.
Having standing tells you whether you can object. It does not tell you whether you should. If the will gives you a gift and contains a no-contest clause, also called an in terrorem clause, an unsuccessful contest can cost you that gift.
New York enforces these clauses, but courts construe them strictly because they cause a forfeiture. A court will look at the exact wording of the clause and the testator's intent. In Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447 (2009), the Court of Appeals held that a beneficiary's conduct did not trigger the clause in that case, even though the conduct fell outside the statutory safe harbors, after reviewing the language of the will and the testator's intent.
EPTL § 3-3.5 lists actions that do not forfeit a gift under a no-contest clause. They include:
The 1404 safe harbor is the reason many beneficiaries take examinations first. You can learn how the will was prepared and signed without risking your gift, then decide whether filing objections is worth it.
The decision comes down to two numbers: the gift you would forfeit if the contest fails, and the amount you would receive if it succeeds.
Suppose a widowed parent leaves a $2,000,000 estate and two children. The will leaves Child 1 a $100,000 gift, leaves the rest to Child 2, and contains a no-contest clause. With no will, each child would take $1,000,000 under EPTL § 4-1.1. Child 1 risks $100,000 for a chance at $1,000,000.
Now change the gift to $900,000. Child 1 still has standing, because $900,000 is less than the $1,000,000 intestate share. But Child 1 would be risking $900,000 to gain $100,000. Few people would bring that contest unless the evidence was very strong.
A beneficiary who receives nothing, or only a token amount, has little to lose under a no-contest clause. A beneficiary close to the intestate share has a much harder decision.
The same threshold question, whether you have a financial stake in the outcome, applies outside will contests:
If your concern is how an executor is handling the estate rather than whether the will is valid, our page on breach of fiduciary duty may be the better starting point.
Before you spend money on a contest, an attorney should confirm that you have standing. Gather what you can of the following:
A standing problem is cheaper to find at the start than after months of litigation end in dismissal.
The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin represents clients in Surrogate's Courts in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island and Long Island. We can review your documents and tell you whether you have standing to object and what a contest would put at risk. Call 212-233-1233 to schedule a consultation.
This page provides general information about New York law and is not legal advice. Statutes and case law change. Read the cited provisions of the Surrogate's Court Procedure Act and the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law, and consult an attorney about your specific situation.