Who Has Standing to Contest a Will in New York? Pecuniary Interest and SCPA 1410

Who has standing to contest a will in New York

In New York, you can contest a will only if admitting that will to probate would cost you money. Lawyers call this a pecuniary interest. The rule comes from Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (SCPA) § 1410, which allows objections to probate from "any person whose interest in property or in the estate of the testator would be adversely affected by the admission of the will to probate." If you do not meet that test, the Surrogate's Court will dismiss your objections without ever looking at whether the will is valid.

This page explains who meets that test, who does not, and how standing is proven and challenged in a New York probate proceeding. If you already know you have standing and want to discuss bringing a contest, see our will contest attorney page. For disputes among heirs that do not involve challenging the will itself, see our NYC inheritance dispute page.

The Short Answer: Two Groups Have Standing

In practice, people with standing to object to a New York will fall into two groups:

  1. Distributees who would receive more without the will. A distributee is a person who would inherit under New York's intestacy statute, EPTL § 4-1.1, if there were no will. If the will gives you less than your intestate share, or nothing, you are adversely affected and have standing.
  2. Beneficiaries under a prior will who would receive more under that prior will. If an earlier will left you more than the will now offered for probate, you have standing, even if you are not related to the decedent at all.

The broader term "person interested" is defined in SCPA § 103. It generally covers anyone entitled, or allegedly entitled, to share as a beneficiary in the estate. Being a person interested is not enough by itself to object to probate. Under SCPA § 1410, your interest must be one that the will would actually harm.

A Worked Example

D dies survived by his spouse, A, and their two children, B and C. D's parents, X and Y, and his sibling, Z, are also alive. D's only will leaves everything to A, B and C. X, Y and Z want to contest it.

The court will not hear their objections. Under EPTL § 4-1.1, when a decedent leaves a spouse and children, the spouse receives $50,000 plus one-half of the balance, and the children share the rest. Parents and siblings receive nothing. Setting the will aside would not put any money in the hands of X, Y or Z, so none of them is adversely affected.

Change one fact. Suppose D signed an earlier will that left a gift to his parents, X and Y. If the new will were denied probate, that earlier will could be offered instead, and X and Y would take their gift. X and Y now have standing to object to the new will. Z still does not, because Z received nothing under either will and would inherit nothing by intestacy.

Standing Quick Reference

The table below is a starting point. Standing always turns on the specific family tree, the terms of every will that exists, and how large each share would be. Have an attorney confirm your position before you act.

PersonStanding to object?Why
Surviving spouseUsually yesA spouse is a first-priority distributee under EPTL § 4-1.1. A spouse can lose that status through disqualification under EPTL § 5-1.2 (for example, abandonment or a final divorce) or a valid written waiver.
Spouse who is separated but not divorcedUsually yesSeparation alone does not end inheritance rights. A separation agreement that waives estate rights, or a disqualification under EPTL § 5-1.2, can remove standing.
Child of the decedentYes, if the will gives the child less than the intestate shareChildren are distributees. A child left out of the will entirely has standing. A child who receives more under the will than by intestacy does not.
Grandchild whose parent is aliveNo, unless named in a prior willGrandchildren inherit by representation only in place of a deceased parent. While the parent is living, the grandchild is not a distributee.
Grandchild whose parent died before the decedentDependsThe grandchild may step into the deceased parent's share by representation, which can create standing.
Parent of the decedentOnly if there is no surviving spouse or child, or under a prior willParents inherit by intestacy only when the decedent left no spouse and no issue.
SiblingOnly if there is no spouse, child or parent, or under a prior willSiblings are further down the intestate order.
Niece or nephewDependsA niece or nephew can be a distributee if there is no spouse, issue or parent, and the niece or nephew's own parent (the decedent's sibling) has died. Otherwise standing requires a prior will.
Unmarried partner, friend or caregiverOnly under a prior willNew York intestacy does not include unmarried partners or caregivers. See also when an aunt leaves an inheritance to a caretaker.
Beneficiary under a prior willYes, if the prior will gave moreThe prior will is the alternative that would take effect if the new will fails.
Beneficiary under the current willOnly if adversely affectedA named beneficiary can object only if the beneficiary would do better by intestacy or under a prior will.
Creditor of the decedentGenerally noA creditor is paid ahead of beneficiaries whether or not the will is admitted, so the will does not affect the creditor's claim.

Standing Based on a Prior Will

Standing based on an earlier will raises proof issues that standing based on family relationship does not.

  • You must produce the prior will or account for it: Courts generally expect the original, or a copy along with evidence that it was properly signed and witnessed. A prior will that cannot be found may be presumed revoked if it was last in the decedent's possession. Proving a lost will is governed by SCPA § 1407 and requires specific proof.
  • The prior will must actually give you more: Compare what you receive under each instrument. If the earlier will gave you the same amount or less, you are not adversely affected.
  • Every later will matters: If the decedent signed several wills, a beneficiary under the earliest one generally must show that each later will would fail. Defeating only the most recent will may simply revive another will that also leaves you out.

A person named in another will that has been filed with the Surrogate's Court, whose interest the propounded will would harm, is among those who must receive a citation under SCPA § 1403. That notice often gives prior-will beneficiaries their first formal opportunity to appear.

Revocable and Lifetime Trusts

Many New York estate plans put most of the assets in a revocable trust, with a short pour-over will. Challenging only the will may accomplish little if the trust controls the money.

The standing logic for trusts is the same. A person who would benefit if a trust amendment were set aside, for example a beneficiary under an earlier version of the trust, has an interest that the amendment harms. New York's Surrogate's Courts have broad jurisdiction over the affairs of decedents under SCPA §§ 201 and 209, and they regularly hear disputes over a decedent's lifetime trusts. The Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction. When the trust dispute is tied to an estate already before the Surrogate, the Surrogate's Court is usually where it is heard. For more on trust disputes, see our NYC trust attorney page.

How Standing Is Raised and Decided

Standing is a threshold issue. It can come up at several points in a New York probate proceeding:

  1. When you appear and ask for SCPA 1404 examinations: Under SCPA § 1404, a person who may object can examine the attesting witnesses, the attorney who drafted the will, the nominated executors and the proponents before deciding whether to file objections. The proponent may argue that you lack standing to take these examinations at all.
  2. When objections are filed: Objections are generally due shortly after the 1404 examinations are completed, often within 10 days, unless the court sets a different schedule. Confirm the deadline in your case. Once objections are filed, the proponent can move to dismiss them for lack of standing.
  3. At a hearing on standing: If the facts are disputed, for example whether a claimed relationship exists or whether a prior will was validly signed, the court may hold a hearing on standing before reaching the merits of the contest.

Relationship-based standing is usually proven with vital records such as birth, marriage and death certificates. Where family relationships are complicated, the court may require additional proof. See our pages on the affidavit of heirship and when an affidavit of heir is required. For where these steps fall in a typical case, see our sample NYC probate timeline.

Standing and No-Contest (In Terrorem) Clauses

Having standing tells you whether you can object. It does not tell you whether you should. If the will gives you a gift and contains a no-contest clause, also called an in terrorem clause, an unsuccessful contest can cost you that gift.

How New York treats no-contest clauses

New York enforces these clauses, but courts construe them strictly because they cause a forfeiture. A court will look at the exact wording of the clause and the testator's intent. In Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447 (2009), the Court of Appeals held that a beneficiary's conduct did not trigger the clause in that case, even though the conduct fell outside the statutory safe harbors, after reviewing the language of the will and the testator's intent.

Statutory safe harbors under EPTL 3-3.5

EPTL § 3-3.5 lists actions that do not forfeit a gift under a no-contest clause. They include:

  • A contest brought on behalf of an infant or incompetent.
  • A contest, based on probable cause, claiming that the will is a forgery or was revoked by a later will.
  • An objection to the court's jurisdiction.
  • Disclosing to the court information relevant to the probate proceeding.
  • Refusing or failing to join in the petition for probate.
  • Pre-objection SCPA 1404 examinations of the attesting witnesses, the drafting attorney, the nominated executors and the proponents, and, on a showing of special circumstances, other persons the court allows.
  • A construction proceeding to determine what the will means.

The 1404 safe harbor is the reason many beneficiaries take examinations first. You can learn how the will was prepared and signed without risking your gift, then decide whether filing objections is worth it.

Comparing what you risk with what you could gain

The decision comes down to two numbers: the gift you would forfeit if the contest fails, and the amount you would receive if it succeeds.

Suppose a widowed parent leaves a $2,000,000 estate and two children. The will leaves Child 1 a $100,000 gift, leaves the rest to Child 2, and contains a no-contest clause. With no will, each child would take $1,000,000 under EPTL § 4-1.1. Child 1 risks $100,000 for a chance at $1,000,000.

Now change the gift to $900,000. Child 1 still has standing, because $900,000 is less than the $1,000,000 intestate share. But Child 1 would be risking $900,000 to gain $100,000. Few people would bring that contest unless the evidence was very strong.

A beneficiary who receives nothing, or only a token amount, has little to lose under a no-contest clause. A beneficiary close to the intestate share has a much harder decision.

Other Surrogate's Court Proceedings That Require an Interest

The same threshold question, whether you have a financial stake in the outcome, applies outside will contests:

  • Compelling an accounting: SCPA § 2205 allows a person interested to petition to compel a fiduciary to account. See our estate accounting lawyers page.
  • Removing an executor or administrator: SCPA § 711 allows a person interested to seek removal of a fiduciary. See our administrator removal attorney page.
  • Objecting to an accounting: A beneficiary or other person interested may file objections to a fiduciary's account.
  • Recovering estate property: Discovery and turnover proceedings under SCPA § 2103 are usually brought by the fiduciary. A beneficiary may be able to act when the fiduciary is the one holding the property. See our discovery and turnover proceeding page.

If your concern is how an executor is handling the estate rather than whether the will is valid, our page on breach of fiduciary duty may be the better starting point.

What to Bring to a Standing Review

Before you spend money on a contest, an attorney should confirm that you have standing. Gather what you can of the following:

  • A copy of the will offered for probate. See whether beneficiaries are entitled to a copy of the will.
  • Any earlier wills or trust documents, or information about where they may be.
  • The citation or other papers you received from the Surrogate's Court.
  • Basic family information: who survived the decedent, who died before, and any adoptions, marriages or divorces.
  • A rough idea of the assets and how they are titled, including trusts, joint accounts and beneficiary designations.

A standing problem is cheaper to find at the start than after months of litigation end in dismissal.

Talk to a New York Estates Attorney

The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin represents clients in Surrogate's Courts in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island and Long Island. We can review your documents and tell you whether you have standing to object and what a contest would put at risk. Call 212-233-1233 to schedule a consultation.

This page provides general information about New York law and is not legal advice. Statutes and case law change. Read the cited provisions of the Surrogate's Court Procedure Act and the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law, and consult an attorney about your specific situation.

Attorney Albert Goodwin

About the Author

Albert Goodwin Esq. is a licensed New York attorney with over 18 years of courtroom experience. His extensive knowledge and experience make him well-qualified to write authoritative articles on a wide range of legal topics. He can be reached at 212-233-1233 or [email protected].

Albert Goodwin gave interviews to and appeared on the following media outlets:

ProPublica Forbes ABC CNBC CBS NBC News Discovery Wall Street Journal NPR

Client Reviews

Verified feedback from our clients

Mr. Goodwin is everything you want in an attorney: professional, honest, thorough, and genuinely caring. He always explains things clearly, so I understood exactly what was happening and what to expect next. His attention to detail and persistence really stood out. Looking back, I feel lucky to have found him. He guided me through the whole process expertly, and I deeply appreciate all his hard work. Would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Sarah M

Legal Services

Thanks to Mr. Albert Goodwin's hard work and smart thinking, I finally won my case, which has been a long time coming. He figured out solutions that no one else could see. I'm really impressed by his strong ethics - something that's rare these days. As my lawyer, he went above and beyond what I expected. I'm so grateful I found him and would definitely recommend him to anyone needing legal help.

Lawrence H

Legal Services

From our first meeting, I knew I was in great hands with Albert and his associate Katrina. They handled my case with incredible skill and efficiency, even though they took it over from another firm. What impressed me most was how quickly Albert responded to my questions with honest, clear answers - no sugarcoating, just straight talk. They managed a huge workload under tight deadlines, and their fees were very reasonable for such high-quality work. Beyond his legal expertise, Albert's wit and personality made a difficult process much easier to handle. I'm deeply grateful for their hard work and would absolutely choose them again. If you need legal help in New York, you won't find better representation than Albert's firm.

Adam F

Legal Services

VIEW MORE
New York State Bar Association Member Badge New York City Bar Association Member Badge American Bar Association Member Badge Avvo Rated Attorney Badge