
Definition of testator: (noun)/ A person who makes a will or has made or left a will. A will, or last will and testament, is a written document detailing the testator’s final wishes on how he wants to dispose his property after his death.
To be a testator and make a valid will, you have to meet certain legal requirements.
For example, in the state of New York, every person eighteen years of age or over, of a sound mind and memory, may by will dispose of real and personal property and exercise a power to appoint such property. NY EPTL § 3-1.1.
Thus, you must have the “testamentary capacity” to be a testator and make a valid will, that is:
“Sound mind and memory” means that the testator knows what he is doing when making a will, what he owns, and the meaning and effect of the will. NY EPTL § 3-1.1.
Even people suffering from mental illness or cognitive defects can be considered of “sound mind.” It all depends on the law’s definition of what is a testator in a will. And even testators who usually lack capacity may be proven to have legal capacity to make a will during a “lucid interval.”
Yes, if:
No, if:
If you would like to be a testator and make your own will or would like to discuss your own personal situation, or would like to know more about the definition of testator, call the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin at 212-233-1233 or send us an email at [email protected] and we will be happy to discuss your estate plan with you.
The standard for testamentary capacity in New York is relatively low — lower than the standard for many other legal acts. The classic formulation requires the testator to understand:
The testator does not need to remember every detail of their assets or family. The testator does not need to make decisions that would seem reasonable to others. The testator only needs the basic understanding listed above. People with significant cognitive impairment can still meet this standard, particularly during lucid intervals.
Mental illness does not automatically defeat testamentary capacity. The key question is whether the illness affected the specific understanding required at the specific moment of the will signing. Some specific situations:
Mild to moderate dementia. Many people with early-stage dementia retain testamentary capacity. They may have memory problems for recent events but retain understanding of their family, their property, and their wishes. A will signed by such a person can be valid if the specific moment of signing met the capacity standard.
Severe dementia. As dementia progresses, capacity becomes more questionable. A person with severe dementia who cannot identify their children, who does not know what property they own, or who cannot understand the concept of a will lacks capacity. The exact line varies with the individual.
Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. A person with schizophrenia may have capacity during periods when symptoms are controlled. The challenge is showing that the will was signed during a competent period and that the specific understanding existed.
Depression. Depression itself rarely affects testamentary capacity. A person can be very depressed and still understand the requirements of making a will.
Substance abuse. Active intoxication can defeat capacity at the moment of signing. A will signed while the testator was drunk or high may be invalid even if the testator generally had capacity at other times.
A testator who generally lacks capacity may have lucid intervals during which capacity is present. Lucid intervals are documented in case law for various conditions:
A will signed during a lucid interval can be valid even though the testator generally lacks capacity. Proving the lucid interval is the burden of the will's proponent. Medical records, physician testimony, lay witness testimony about the testator's appearance and behavior, and contemporaneous documents are all relevant evidence.
For testators where capacity may be questioned, careful documentation at the time of signing is essential. Best practices include:
Testamentary capacity is one ground for challenging a will. Undue influence is a separate ground that does not necessarily involve capacity. Undue influence occurs when a person with confidential access to the testator (a caregiver, a close family member, a new acquaintance) exerts pressure that overcomes the testator's free will. The testator may have full capacity but still be the victim of undue influence.
The two grounds often appear together in will contests. The contestants argue that the testator lacked capacity, was unduly influenced, or both. The proponent must defend on both grounds.
In New York, the proponent of the will bears the initial burden of proving that the testator had testamentary capacity. This burden is satisfied by the will witnesses' testimony (or the self-proving affidavit) attesting that the testator appeared competent at the signing.
Once this prima facie showing is made, the burden shifts to the contestant to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the testator actually lacked capacity. The contestant typically relies on medical records, lay witness testimony, and other evidence to overcome the prima facie case.