New York law does not allow one spouse to completely disinherit the other. Under EPTL 5-1.1-A, a surviving spouse has the right to "elect against" the deceased spouse's estate plan and take a guaranteed minimum share — called the elective share — regardless of what the will says, and regardless of how much property the decedent moved outside the will through joint accounts, beneficiary designations, or revocable trusts. This page explains, in plain language, how the statute works, what counts toward the share, how the election is made in Surrogate's Court, and the deadlines that can extinguish the right entirely if missed.
EPTL 5-1.1-A applies to the estates of decedents dying on or after September 1, 1992, who were domiciled in New York at death. (For a non-domiciliary who left property in New York, the right generally exists only if the decedent elected in the will to have New York law govern under EPTL 3-5.1(h).) The right belongs only to a legally recognized surviving spouse. A former spouse — or a spouse disqualified under EPTL 5-1.2, discussed below — has no right of election.
Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(a)(2), the elective share is a pecuniary amount equal to the greater of:
The "net estate" is the estate reduced by debts, administration expenses, and reasonable funeral expenses — but calculated before estate taxes — and, critically, it includes not only probate assets passing under the will but also testamentary substitutes.
The statute's real power lies in EPTL 5-1.1-A(b)(1), which pulls non-probate transfers back into the calculation. Without this rule, a decedent could defeat the elective share simply by titling everything in joint name or naming beneficiaries. Testamentary substitutes include:
Important exclusion: life insurance proceeds payable to a named beneficiary are not testamentary substitutes under EPTL 5-1.1-A. This is one of the most consequential gaps in the statute and figures prominently in both estate planning and elective share litigation.
Suppose a decedent dies with:
The net estate is $600,000 + $150,000 + $150,000 − $60,000 = $840,000. The elective share is the greater of $50,000 or one-third of $840,000, i.e., $280,000.
If the will leaves the surviving spouse $100,000 outright and nothing else passes to the spouse, the spouse who files a valid election is entitled to an additional $180,000 ($280,000 − $100,000). Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(c)(2), the other beneficiaries — including the recipients of the testamentary substitutes — must contribute ratably, in proportion to what each received, to make up the shortfall.
Only property passing to the spouse absolutely and outright — under the will, by intestacy, or as a testamentary substitute — counts against the elective share. Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(a)(4), an interest in a trust (including a life income interest) does not count. A decedent cannot satisfy the elective share by leaving the spouse income from a trust, no matter how generous. A spouse left "income for life" from the entire estate may still elect and take one-third outright; if the spouse elects, the terms of the instrument otherwise remain effective to the extent possible, with the elective share carved out first.
The election is governed by EPTL 5-1.1-A(d). The procedural steps are:
The deadlines under EPTL 5-1.1-A(d)(1) are strict:
The Surrogate's Court may extend the time for reasonable cause shown on application made within the election period, and may in limited circumstances relieve a spouse from a default. But extensions are discretionary and relief from default is never guaranteed — a spouse who suspects disinheritance should act well before the six-month mark, and should not wait for estate litigation to resolve before filing.
Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(e), a spouse may waive the right of election — wholly or partially, and as to particular property — before or after marriage. This is the standard mechanism in prenuptial and postnuptial agreements. To be valid, the waiver must be in writing, subscribed by the waiving spouse, and acknowledged or proved in the manner required for recording a deed. Waivers are frequently challenged on grounds of fraud, duress, overreaching, or defective acknowledgment, and the validity of a waiver is often the central battleground in elective share litigation.
A surviving spouse loses the right of election if disqualified under EPTL 5-1.2, which applies where:
Abandonment and failure to support are fact-intensive defenses that estate beneficiaries frequently raise to defeat an election, and the burden of proving disqualification rests on the party asserting it.
Elective share matters involve unforgiving deadlines, contested asset tracing, and litigation over waivers and disqualification in Surrogate's Court. Attorney Albert Goodwin represents surviving spouses, executors, and beneficiaries throughout New York in right of election proceedings under EPTL 5-1.1-A and related estate disputes.
We assert the elective share for surviving spouses — including reaching testamentary substitutes the will’s drafters used to divert assets — and we defend estates against invalid elections. The six-month clock from letters is unforgiving.
We at the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin have been handling these matters in New York Surrogate’s Court for over 15 years. Call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected] for a consultation.
Related resources on this site: spousal right of election, elective share attorney.