Discovering that your spouse has left you out of their will—or left you far less than you expected—can be devastating, both emotionally and financially. Fortunately, New York law does not permit one spouse to completely disinherit the other. Under New York's spousal right of election, a surviving spouse is entitled to claim a statutory minimum share of the deceased spouse's estate, regardless of what the will says or how assets were titled.
Our New York spousal right of election attorneys represent surviving spouses seeking to enforce their elective share rights, as well as executors, fiduciaries, and beneficiaries responding to election claims. Whether you have been disinherited, received less than the law guarantees, or need to defend an estate against an election, we provide the experienced, strategic counsel these high-stakes matters demand.
The spousal right of election is a statutory protection codified in New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL) Section 5-1.1-A. It guarantees that a surviving spouse may elect to receive a minimum portion of the deceased spouse's estate—known as the elective share—even if the will leaves the spouse nothing or attempts to direct assets elsewhere.
The policy behind the statute is straightforward: New York recognizes marriage as an economic partnership and will not allow one partner to leave the other destitute at death. While New York residents enjoy broad freedom to dispose of their property by will, that freedom ends where the surviving spouse's statutory rights begin.
Under EPTL 5-1.1-A, the surviving spouse is entitled to the greater of $50,000 or one-third of the net estate. If the net estate is worth less than $50,000, the surviving spouse is entitled to the entire net estate.
Critically, the "net estate" for elective share purposes is not limited to assets passing under the will. It includes the probate estate plus a category of non-probate assets known as testamentary substitutes, minus debts, administration expenses, and reasonable funeral expenses. This expanded definition prevents a spouse from defeating the election by simply moving assets outside the will before death.
One of the most important—and most litigated—features of New York's elective share statute is its treatment of testamentary substitutes. Many people attempt to disinherit a spouse by placing assets in joint accounts, trusts, or beneficiary-designated accounts that pass outside probate. New York law anticipates this strategy. EPTL 5-1.1-A pulls many of these assets back into the calculation of the net estate.
Testamentary substitutes generally include:
Some assets are generally excluded, most notably life insurance proceeds payable to a named beneficiary other than the estate. Identifying, valuing, and characterizing testamentary substitutes is often the central battleground in elective share litigation, and it requires both legal skill and forensic diligence.
Calculating the elective share involves several steps, each of which can become contested:
If a shortfall exists, the other beneficiaries of the estate and the recipients of testamentary substitutes must contribute ratably to satisfy the spouse's claim. This means an elective share claim can affect not only the executor but also individual beneficiaries, trustees, and joint account holders—any of whom may need their own counsel.
The right of election is not automatic. The surviving spouse must affirmatively exercise it, and the deadlines are unforgiving. Under EPTL 5-1.1-A, the election must be made within six months after letters testamentary or letters of administration are issued, but in no event later than two years after the date of death.
To exercise the right, the surviving spouse must:
The Surrogate's Court has discretion to extend the deadline for reasonable cause if an application is made within the two-year window, but extensions are never guaranteed. A surviving spouse who suspects they have been shortchanged should consult counsel immediately—waiting can permanently forfeit rights worth hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Not every surviving spouse is entitled to elect. EPTL 5-1.2 sets out the grounds on which a spouse may be disqualified, and these grounds are frequently raised by estates defending against election claims. A surviving spouse may lose the right of election if:
Abandonment and failure to support are fact-intensive defenses that often require extensive discovery, witness testimony, and documentary evidence. The burden of proving disqualification rests on the party asserting it—typically the executor or the beneficiaries who stand to lose if the election succeeds.
The right of election can be waived—before or during the marriage—but only if the waiver complies with strict statutory formalities. Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(e), a waiver must be:
Waivers most commonly appear in prenuptial and postnuptial agreements. They may be absolute or conditional, and they may apply to a particular will or to any will. However, even a facially valid waiver can be challenged on grounds such as fraud, duress, overreaching, unconscionability, or defective acknowledgment. If you are being told you waived your elective share, do not assume the waiver is enforceable—have it reviewed by an attorney experienced in elective share litigation.
Our New York attorneys regularly handle elective share matters arising from situations such as:
Elective share disputes frequently arise when a decedent leaves most or all of the estate to children from a prior marriage. The surviving spouse's election can dramatically reshape the distribution plan, often triggering contested proceedings between the spouse and stepchildren.
When an older individual marries shortly before death, family members may challenge the marriage itself or assert disqualification defenses, while the surviving spouse seeks to enforce the statutory share.
A decedent may have retitled accounts, funded revocable trusts, or made large gifts shortly before death. Tracing these transfers and establishing that they qualify as testamentary substitutes is essential to recovering the full elective share.
Couples who separated informally but never divorced remain married for elective share purposes. These cases often turn on abandonment and support defenses under EPTL 5-1.2.
Prenuptial agreements signed decades earlier, sometimes without independent counsel or full financial disclosure, may be challenged when one spouse dies and the survivor seeks an elective share.
Elective share disputes are litigated in the Surrogate's Court of the county where the estate is being administered. A contested election can involve:
Because the elective share is paid outright—New York abolished the old rules permitting satisfaction through trust interests for decedents dying on or after September 1, 1992—the financial stakes for all parties are immediate and significant.
The right of election is equally important on the planning side. If you are creating an estate plan in New York, our attorneys can help you:
For surviving spouses, early legal advice is equally critical. Before signing any waiver, release, or receipt presented by an executor, have it reviewed. Documents signed during estate administration can compromise your election rights.
No. Unless you are disqualified or have validly waived your rights, New York law entitles you to the greater of $50,000 or one-third of the net estate, including testamentary substitutes, no matter what the will says.
Yes. The right of election applies whether the decedent died with or without a will. In intestacy, the surviving spouse already receives a substantial share under EPTL 4-1.1, but the election can matter where significant assets passed outside the estate through testamentary substitutes to others.
Revocable trusts, joint accounts (to the extent of the decedent's contribution), and many beneficiary-designated assets are testamentary substitutes counted in the net estate. The election can reach these assets even though they never passed through probate.
Not necessarily. A waiver must meet strict formal requirements and may be vulnerable to challenge based on fraud, duress, lack of disclosure, unconscionability, or a defective acknowledgment. An attorney should evaluate the agreement before you concede anything.
Generally six months from the issuance of letters to the fiduciary, and never more than two years from the date of death, subject to limited court-granted extensions for reasonable cause. Act quickly—these deadlines are strictly enforced.
No. The right of election belongs only to a legal surviving spouse. Unmarried partners, regardless of the length of the relationship, have no elective share rights under New York law, which makes proactive estate planning essential for unmarried couples.
Elective share matters sit at the intersection of estate litigation, trust law, matrimonial law, and forensic asset analysis. Our firm brings:
If you have been disinherited or shortchanged by your spouse's will, or if you are an executor or beneficiary facing an election claim, the decisions you make in the coming weeks will shape the outcome. Deadlines are short, the calculations are complex, and the financial stakes are substantial.
Contact our New York spousal right of election attorneys today for a confidential consultation. We will review the will, the estate's assets, and any agreements you signed, explain your rights and obligations under New York law, and chart a clear strategy to protect what you are entitled to receive.
You can contact us by phone at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].