New York law does not allow a married person to completely disinherit a surviving spouse. No matter what the will says — and even if there is no will at all — a surviving spouse of a New York domiciliary is entitled to a minimum statutory share of the estate, called the elective share. The substantive right comes from EPTL 5-1.1-A (for decedents dying on or after September 1, 1992). The procedural vehicle for resolving disputes about that right is SCPA 1421, which authorizes a special proceeding in Surrogate's Court to determine the validity and effect of a spouse's election.
This page explains, in plain language, what the right of election is, how the elective share is calculated (with worked examples), how to make and perfect an election, how an SCPA 1421 proceeding unfolds step by step, the deadlines that control, and the mistakes that most often cost surviving spouses part or all of their share.
Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(a)(2), a surviving spouse is entitled to the greater of $50,000 or one-third of the decedent's net estate. This is a personal right of the spouse — it does not pass to the spouse's heirs if the spouse dies without exercising it, although a court-appointed guardian of the property of an incapacitated spouse may be authorized to exercise it on the spouse's behalf.
Three points are frequently misunderstood:
SCPA 1421 is titled "Proceeding to determine validity and effect of election by surviving spouse." It does not create the right of election — EPTL 5-1.1-A does that. Instead, SCPA 1421 gives the Surrogate's Court a dedicated procedure to resolve disputes about an election that has been made (or attempted). Under the statute:
Typical disputes decided in an SCPA 1421 proceeding include: whether the notice of election was timely served and filed; whether the petitioner is legally a "surviving spouse" at all; whether the spouse waived the right in a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement; whether the spouse is disqualified under EPTL 5-1.2; which assets are testamentary substitutes; how the net estate and elective share are computed; and how much each beneficiary must contribute.
The net estate equals the probate estate plus testamentary substitutes, minus debts, administration expenses, and reasonable funeral expenses. Estate taxes are not deducted before computing the elective share.
The testamentary substitutes listed in EPTL 5-1.1-A(b)(1) include, in substance:
Life insurance proceeds are not a testamentary substitute. This is one of the most consequential exclusions in the statute: a policy payable to someone other than the spouse is outside the elective share calculation entirely.
The elective share is the greater of $50,000 or one-third of the net estate. From that figure, subtract the value of everything passing absolutely to the spouse — outright bequests, the spouse's intestate share, and testamentary substitutes payable outright to the spouse. The remainder is the net elective share, which other beneficiaries and recipients of testamentary substitutes must fund ratably, in proportion to the value each received (EPTL 5-1.1-A(c)(2)).
The decedent, a New York domiciliary, dies with:
The calculation:
The decedent leaves a probate estate of $100,000, a payable-on-death account of $35,000 naming a sibling, and $15,000 in debts and expenses. The will leaves the spouse nothing.
A trust paying income to the spouse for life — even a generously funded one — does not count toward the elective share under EPTL 5-1.1-A(a)(4). If the will leaves the spouse only a trust income interest, the spouse may still elect and take the full elective share outright. This is a deliberate change from the pre-1992 statute (EPTL 5-1.1), under which a qualifying trust could limit the spouse's outright recovery to $10,000 plus an income interest. For deaths on or after September 1, 1992, trusts do not defeat the election.
Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(d)(1), the spouse must serve a written notice of election on the personal representative (executor or administrator). Service may be made personally or by certified mail, return receipt requested. If no fiduciary has yet been appointed, the statute permits service on the person named as executor in a will on file with the court.
The original notice of election, with proof of service, must be filed and recorded in the Surrogate's Court where the estate is being administered, within the same statutory period. Service alone is not enough; an election that is served but never filed and recorded is defective.
The notice must be served and filed within six months from the date letters testamentary or letters of administration issue, but in no event later than two years after the decedent's death. The Surrogate may extend the time to elect on an application showing reasonable cause, and has limited discretionary authority under EPTL 5-1.1-A(d) to relieve a spouse from a default — but relief is not available once a decree settling the fiduciary's account has been made, and it is never guaranteed. The only safe course is to elect within six months of letters.
Either side may commence the proceeding. A surviving spouse typically petitions when the executor refuses to recognize the election, disputes the computation, or denies that certain assets are testamentary substitutes. An executor or beneficiary typically petitions to have the election declared invalid — for untimeliness, waiver, or disqualification. The petition is filed in the Surrogate's Court with jurisdiction over the estate and asks the court to determine the validity or effect of the election and to require interested persons to show cause why that determination should not be made.
Process issues to all persons whose interests would be affected — the fiduciary, will beneficiaries, and recipients of testamentary substitutes who may owe ratable contribution. Each must be served in accordance with SCPA article 3. Parties under disability require the appointment of a guardian ad litem.
Disputed elections often turn on facts: who funded a joint account, whether the parties' separation amounted to abandonment, whether a prenuptial waiver was properly acknowledged, or how assets should be valued. Disclosure under CPLR article 31 is available in Surrogate's Court proceedings. Issues of fact are set down for a hearing or trial before the Surrogate.
The court's decree determines the validity of the election, fixes the net estate and the net elective share, and directs ratable contribution under EPTL 5-1.1-A(c)(2). Recipients of testamentary substitutes — including banks holding Totten trust or joint account proceeds already paid out to beneficiaries — can be compelled to contribute. The decree is enforceable like any Surrogate's Court decree, and the issues it decides are binding on all parties served.
| Action | Deadline | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Serve notice of election on the personal representative | Within 6 months of issuance of letters; never later than 2 years after death | EPTL 5-1.1-A(d)(1) |
| File and record the notice, with proof of service, in Surrogate's Court | Same period | EPTL 5-1.1-A(d)(1) |
| Application to extend time or for relief from default | Discretionary; reasonable cause required; unavailable after a decree settling the account | EPTL 5-1.1-A(d)(2) |
| Petition to determine validity/effect of election | Any time a genuine dispute exists after an election is made | SCPA 1421 |
Under EPTL 5-1.1-A(e), a spouse may waive the right of election before or after marriage, with or without consideration — most commonly in a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement. The waiver must be in writing, signed, and acknowledged or proved in the manner required to record a deed. A defective acknowledgment can invalidate the waiver, and waivers are also subject to attack for fraud, duress, or overreaching. Whether a general waiver covers the elective share, or only certain rights, is a matter of the instrument's language and is frequently litigated within SCPA 1421 proceedings.
A surviving spouse loses the right of election if any ground in EPTL 5-1.2 is established:
The party asserting disqualification bears the burden of proof. Abandonment requires more than living apart — it must be unjustified and without the decedent's consent, which makes these hearings fact-intensive.
Right of election disputes combine strict deadlines, technical asset-classification rules, and heavily factual defenses — a difficult mix to navigate without counsel on either side of the dispute. Attorney Albert Goodwin represents surviving spouses, executors, and beneficiaries in right of election matters and SCPA 1421 proceedings in Surrogate's Courts throughout New York. If you are considering an election, or an election has been asserted against an estate you are administering or inheriting from, contact the office for a consultation.
We litigate SCPA 1421 proceedings on both sides: establishing a surviving spouse’s right to the elective share, and challenging elections by disqualified spouses. Waivers, prenups and abandonment defenses all get decided here.
We at the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin have been handling these matters in New York Surrogate’s Court for over 15 years. Call us at 212-233-1233 or email [email protected] for a consultation.
Related resources on this site: spousal right of election, elective share attorney.